xxi
C.  The Objectives of the study
Based on the problem statement, the objectives of this research are: 1. To identify whether Acting Play Scripts technique can improve students’
speaking skill. 2. To know to what extent Acting Play Scripts technique improve students’
speaking skill. 3. To describe class situation when Acting Play Scripts technique is implemented
in speaking class.
D.  The Benefits of the Study
1. For Students: a.  To create students skill in speaking in daily life.
b.  To provide revelation of learning English and practice for their speaking in meaningful way.
c.  To motivate students to practice speaking English fluently. d.  To create an interesting and comforting atmosphere in the classroom.
e.  To increase students motivation to master English Speaking skill. 2. For teacher as a researcher:
a. To make create joyful learning in speaking class b. To enlarge the mind set of teaching speaking in the teaching learning
process.
xxii
3. For other teachers: a.  As  a  reference  for  those  who  want  to  conduct  a  research  in  English
teaching process. b.  As an input of knowledge in English teaching process.
4. For English Education Department: To utilize the result of the study on a scope of a similar research.
xxiii
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
This chapter consists of the following sections: the theoretical description and  action  hypothesis.  Meanwhile,  the  theoretical  description  consists  of  the
explanation of speaking skill, drama, and communicative language teaching. Here the writer tries to elaborate the further discussion of each section above.
A. The Nature of Speaking 1. The Meaning of Speaking Skill
Speaking is a speech production that becomes a part of our daily activities. Most  of  speaking  activities  are  in  the  form  of  face-to-face  dialogue;  therefore
speaking involves interaction Thornburry, 2005: 8. Spoken English has different characteristics with the written form. Harmer
1998: 49 states saveral characteristics of English as spoken language, as follows: first,  people  speak  in  incomplete  sentence.  Second,  speakers  must  rrepeat  what
each other says. Third, speakers tend to apply contractions. Another characteristic in  spoken  language  is  paralinguistic  feature  Harmer,  1998:  49.  Paralinguistic
feature  refers  to  non-linguistic  ways  in  which  speech  can  be  affected.  These include the tone, expression, and body language.
Harmer 1991: 46 states that when people are engaged in talking to each other, they are doing so for good reasons:
xxiv
a. They want to say something When people want to speak, it means that there is a definite decision to address
other people. People need to speak, otherwise they will keep silent. b. They have some communicative purpose
Speakers say things because they want something to happen as a result of what they  say,  such  as  giving  some  information  or  expressing  pleasure.  The
important thing is the message they wish to convey and the effect they want it to have.
c. They select from their language store Speakers have an infinite capacity to create new sentences. In order to
achievethis communicative purposes they will select from the “store” of language theypossess. That is the language that they think appropriate for this
purpose. The  process  of  speaking  involves  three  stages  namely  conceptualization,
formulation,  and  articulation  Thornburry,  2005:  9.  Formulation  refers  to  the mapping of the idea in the mind. When the idea has  been mapped out, then it is
formulated.  Formulation  involves  the  making  of  strategic  choices  at  the  level  of discourse,  syntax,  and  vocabulary.  What  has  formulated  is  then  articulated.
Articulation  involves  the  use  of  the  organ  of  speech  to  produce  sounds.  The processes of articulation are engaged by forming vowels and consonants and then
combined into phonemes Thornburry, 2005: 5.
xxv
Thornburry 2005: 4 proposes basic knowledge that enabling speech in a second language, they are:
a. A core grammar b. a core vocabulary of at least 1000 high frequency items
c. some common discourse markers d. a core “phrase book” of multi-word units chunks
e. formulaic ways of performing common speech acts, such as requesting or inviting.
f.  mastery of those features of pronunciation that inhabit intelligibility.
Harmer  1991:  50  suggests  three  stages  in  teaching  speaking,  namely introducing new language, practice, and communictive activities.
a. Introducing new language Intoducing  stage  is  often  called  presentation.  Teacher  often  works  with
controlled  technique,  such  as  asking  students  to  repeat  and  perform  in  drills. Teacher usually insists in accuracy. There is correction on students’ mistakes.
Drilling abbondoned as soon as possible because it is very important in helping students to assimilate with the new language and enabling them to produce new
language for the first time. b.  practice
During practice time the teacher may intervene slightly to help guide and point out inaccuracy.
xxvi
c. communicative activities Communicative  activities  are  those  which  exhibit  the  characteristics  at  the
communicative end of the lesson. Students are involved in activities that give them  both  the  desire  to  communicate  and  a  purpose  which  involve  them  in  a
varied use of language. Another  opinion  about  speaking  is  stated  by  Widdowson  1978:  58.  He
says  that  speaking  has  two  meanings.  First,  it  refers  to  the  manner  in  which language  is  manifested.  Second,  it  refers  to  the  manner  in  which  language  is
realized as communication. Mackey 2007: 13 states that speaking is oral expression that involves not
only the use of the right patterns of rhythm and intonation but also right order to convey the right meaning. In addition, Nunan 1991: 390 states that mastering the
art of speaking is the single most important aspect of learning a second or foreign language and success is measured in term of the ability to carry out a conversation
in the language.
2. Types of Classroom Speaking Skill
According to Brown 1994: 266, there are six types of speaking skill that the  students  are  expected  to  carry  out  in  the  classroom.  In  this  section,  the  six
types of speaking skill are presented as follows: a. Imitative
In this type of performance, the students are asked to repeat or imitate the teachers’  speech  or  speech  of  tape  recorder.  Imitation  of  this  kind  is  carried  out
xxvii
not for the purpose of meaningful interaction, but for focusing on some particular elements  of  language  form.  In  other  words,  this  activity  focuses  more  on  form
rather than on meaning. Such activity is also called “drilling”. Drills offer students an opportunity  to listen  and to orally  repeat  certain strings of language that may
pose  some  linguistic  difficulties-  either  phonological  or  grammatical.  They  offer limited  practice  through  repetition.  Furthermore,  Brown  says  that  drills  can  help
to  establish  certain  psychomotor  pattern  and  to  associate  selected  grammatical forms with their appropriate context.
Brown’s statement above can be interpreted that drilling is still important and for teaching speaking, mainly pronunciation and intonation as long as it is not
overused and students know why they are doing the drill. b. Intensive
In  this  type  of  skill,  students  deal  with  their  linguistic  difficulties-either phonological  or  grammatical  aspect  of  language.  Brown  states  that  intensive
speaking goes one step beyond imitative to include any speaking performance that is  designed  to  practice  some  phonological  or  grammatical  aspects  of  language.
Intensive speaking can be in form of self-initiated or it can be part of some pair work activity, where learners are ‘going over’ certain forms of language.
c. Responsive In  this  type,  students  may  give  short  replies  to  teacher  or  even  students
have  an  initiative  for  asking  questions  or  comments.  Students’  responses  are
xxviii
usually sufficient and do not extend into dialogues. However, such speech can be meaningful and authentic.
d. Transactional dialogue Here, students  are involved in exchanging specific information with their
conversational partners.  This activity is carried out for the purpose of conveying or  exchanging  specific  information.  Brown  1994:  266  says  that  transactional
language  is  an  extended  form  of  responsive  language.  It  may  have  more  of  a negotiate nature than merely responsive speech.
e. Interpersonal dialogue The  students  actively  participate  in  the  authentic  give  and  take  of
communicative  interchange.  This  type  of  activity  is  carried  out  more  for  the purpose of maintaining social relationships than for the transmission of facts and
information.  It  deals  with  the  factors  of  casual  register,  colloquial  language, emotionally charged language, slang, ellipsis, sarcasm, and a covert agenda.
f. Extensive monologue The students are called on to give extended monologues in the form of oral
reports,  summaries,  or  perhaps  short  speeches.  This  skill  is  used  to  develop students’ global oral ability of producing spoken language which is  more formal
deliberative.
3. Characteristics of Successful Speaking Activity
xxix
Ur 1996: 121 identifies four problems that may hamper the successful of speaking class as follows:
a.  Inhibition. Speaking  activities  require  real  context  and  exposure  to  an  audience.  This
often makes students inhabited in speaking in front of others. Students may be worried or afraid of making mistakes and being humiliated.
b. Nothing to say Students often cannot think and find any words to say even though they may
have some vocabularies and knowledge about the topics. c. Low or uneven participation
Speaking  class  may  face  this  problem,  especially  in  big  classes.  Students must wait for their turn to speak and before they have chance to speak, the
time is over. A talkative or smart student who dominates the speaking will make this problem worse.
d. Mother tongue use The use of native language during speaking activities will hamper the use of
the target language. Chaney  1998:  13  defines  that  speaking  as  the  “process  of  building  and
sharing  meaning  through  the  use  of  verbal  and  non-verbal  symbol  in  variety context”.  Speaking  involves  three  areas  of  knowledge:  pronunciation,  grammar,
xxx
and  vocabulary.  Speaking  is  also  the  ability  to  use  the  right  words  in  the  right order with the right pronunciation.
From the definitions above, it can be concluded that speaking is ability to say something which involves the ability in using the words in the correct order,
correct  pronunciation,  right  grammatical  form,  and  meaningful  context  fluency and choosing the appropriate words or vocabularies in the process of interpreting
and negotiating meaning in conveying messages  to establish and maintain social relationship.
To create a successful speaking class and to solve the problems mentioned above, Ur 1996: 121-122 suggests the teacher to use activities as the following:
a. Use group work In  line  with  Ur’s  opinion,  Brown  2000:  178  states  that  group  work  can
prompt  interactive  language,  offer  a  comfortable  affective  climate,  promote students responsibility and a move toward individualizing instruction.
b. Base the activity on easy language Teachers  should  recognize  the  level  of  the  students’  language  and  provide  an
easy activity to recall and produce. c. Make a careful choice of topic and task to stimulate interest
Teachers should choose an interesting topic and task for the students in order to motivate their interest in the activity provided.
d. Give some instructions or trainings in discussion skills.
xxxi
Giving  instruction  or  training  on  how  discussion  should  be  performed  will ensure that the activities work well. There should be clear rules how discussion
will be done and each student is given specific roles to get involved in it.
e. Keep students speaking in the target language. Teachers should monitor the students in speaking class to make sure they speak
well  at  their  best  ability.  To  help  teachers  do  this  job,  they  can  ask  some students to monitor the others in turn.
Kayi  2006  suggests  some  considerations  for  English  language  teachers while teaching speaking:
a.  Provide maximum opportunity to students to speak the target language by providing  a  rich  environment  that  contains  collaborative  work,  authentic
materials, and shared knowledge. b.  Try to involve each student in every speaking activity; for this aim, practice
different ways of students’ participation. c.  Reduce  teacher  speaking  time  in  class  while  increasing  students  speaking
time. Step back and observe students. d.  Indicate positive signs when commenting on a students’ response.
e.  Ask  eliciting  questions  such  as  “What  do  you  mean?  How  did  you  reach that conclusion?” In order to prompt students to speak more.
f.  Provide written feedback.
xxxii
g.  Do  not  correct  students’  mistakes  in  pronunciation  very  often  while  they are  speaking.  Correction  should  not  distract  students  from  his  or  her
speech. h.  Involve  speaking  activities  not  only  in  class  but  also  out  of  class;  contact
parents and other people who can help. i.  Circulate  around  classroom  to  ensure  that  students  are  on  the  right  track
and see whether they need your help while they work in groups or pairs. j.  Provide the vocabulary beforehand that students need in speaking activities.
k.  Diagnose  problems  faced  by  students  who  have  difficulty  in  expressing themselves  in  the  target  language  and  provide  more  opportunities  to
practice the spoken language. Ur  1999:  120  says  that  the  characteristics  of  a  successful  speaking
activity are as follows: a. Learners talk a lot
The students talk as much as possible. All of the period of the time allotted to the  activity  is  in  fact  occupied  by  learners  talk.  This  may  seem  obvious,  but
often most time is taken up with teacher talk or pauses. b. Participation is even.
Classroom discussion is not determined by a minority of talkative participants; all get chance to speak and contributions are fairly evenly distributed.
xxxiii
c. Motivation is high Learners  are  eager  to  speak  because  they  are  interested  in  the  topic  and  have
something new to say about it, or because they want to contribute to achieving a task objective.
d. language is of an acceptable level. Learners  express  themselves  in  utterances  that  are  relevant,  easily
comprehensible to each other, and of an acceptable level of language accuracy. From  the  statements  above,  it  can  be  concluded  that  someone  owns  a
certain  language  speaking  competence  if  heshe  can  produce  oral  language  to participate  in  any  kind  of  activity.  Heshe  can  also  respond  the  other  ones’
speaking  to  maintain  hisher  social  relationship.  Besides,  hisher  language  is acceptable and easily comprehensible at the level of language accuracy.
4. Macro and Micro-skill of Speaking
Brown  2003:    142-143  explains  that  a  list  of  speaking  skills  can  be drawn  up  for  the  purpose  to  serve  as  a  taxonomy  of  skills  from  which  we  will
select  one  or  several  that  will  become  the  objective    of  an  assessment  task.  The micro-skills refer to producing the smaller chunks of language such as phonemes,
morphemes,  words,  collocations,  and  phrasal  units.  The  macro-skill  implies  the speaker’s  focus  on  the  larger  elements:  fluency,  discourse,  function,  style,
cohesion, nonverbal communication, and strategic option. The micro and macro- skills total roughly 16 objectives to assess in speaking are described as follows:
a. Micro-skills
xxxiv
1  Producing difference among English phonemes and allophonic variant. 2  Producing chunks of language of different length.
3  Producing English stress patterns, words in stressed position, rhythmic structure, and intonation contours.
4 Producing reduced forms of words and phrases. 5  Using an adequate number of lexical units words to accomplish
pragmatic purposes. 6  Producing fluent speech at different rates of delivery.
7  Monitoring one’s own oral production and use various strategic devices- pauses, fillers, self-corrections, backtracking- to enhance the clarity of  the
message. 8  Using grammatical word classes nouns, verbs, etc, systems e.g. tense,
agreement, pluralization, word order, pattern, rules, and elliptical forms. 9  Producing speech in natural constituents: in appropriate phrases, pause
groups, breathe groups, and sentence constituents. 10 Expressing a particular meaning in different grammatical form.
11 Using cohesive devices in spoken discourse. b. Macro-skills
1  accomplishing appropriately communicative function according to situations, participants, and goals.
2  using appropriate styles, registers, implicative, redundancies, pragmatic conventions, convention  rules, floor keeping and yielding, interrupting,
xxxv
and other sociolinguistic features in face-to-face conversations. 3  conveying links and connections between events and communicate such
relations  as  focal  and  peripheral  ideas,  events,  and  feelings,  new information and given information, generalization and exemplification.
4  conveying facial features, kinesics, body language, and other nonverbal cues along with verbal language.
5 developing  and  use  a  battery  of  speaking  strategies,  such  as  emphasizing key  words, rephrasing, providing a context for interpreting the meaning of
words,  appealing  for  help,  and  accurately  assessing  how  well  your interlocutor is understanding you.
As  we  consider  designing  tasks  for  assessing  spoken  language,  these skills  can act  as  a  checklist of objectives. The macro-skill has  the appearance of
being  more  complex  than  the  micro-skill;  both  contain  ingredients  of  difficulty, depending on the stage and context of the test-taker.
5. Factors Influencing the Students’ Speaking Skill
There  are  some  influential  factors  in  developing  the  speaking  skill.  The factors  that  influence  the  speaking  skill  of  the  students  are  interest,  motivation,
and environment. The explanation of each factor is as follows: The  first  one  is  the  students’  interest.  The  students’  interest  to  study  and
practice  the  speaking  skill  is  an  important  factor.  By  having  strong  interest,  the learners  will  try  to  give  great  attention  to  improve  their  speaking.  They  will
xxxvi
manage some activities that enable them to increase their skill. Besides, the desire to learn is strengthened Alexander, 1976: 17.
Dealing  with  the  above  opinion,  it  is  necessary  to  know  that  one  of  the causes of the failure in teaching English at school is that the teacher still teaches
with the routine activities without considering that it will make the students bored, and  lost  their  attention  to  the  teaching  and  learning  process.  As  the  result,  the
students will not be able to catch the lesson easily because of their lost interest and participation,  as  stated  by  Douglas  “Routine  activities  in  learning  can  make  the
students  bored.  As  the  result,  their  motivation  and  participation  in  learning  will decrease.” 1987: 48.
Here,  interest  becomes  a  crucial  factor  in  deciding  on  classroom  practice for  teaching  the  students.  So,  the  teacher  should  apply  the  suitable  teaching
technique  which  enables  to  increase  the  students’  interest  for  learning  in  the classroom. In other word, the technique used by the teacher in teaching English to
the  students  especially  speaking  skill  should  be  able  to  create  an  interesting atmosphere  so  that  the  students  will  be  able  to  be  comfortable,  enthusiastic,
excited, and interested in joining the lesson in the teaching learning activity. The  second  one  is  the  students’  motivation.  Ur  1999:  274  states  that
various studies have found, that motivation is very strongly related to achievement in language learning. The abstract term ‘motivation’ on its own is rather difficult
to define. It is easier and more useful to think in terms of the ‘motivated’ learner: one  who  is  willing  or  even  eager  to  invest  effort  in  learning  activities  and  to
xxxvii
progress.  Learners’ motivation makes teaching and learning immeasurably easier and more pleasant, as well as more productive.
Furthermore,  Ur  1999:    275  says  that  the  authors  of  a  classic  study  of successful  learning  come  to  the  conclusion  that  the  most  successful  learners  are
not necessarily those to whom a language comes very easily; they are those who display  certain  typical  characteristic,  most  of  them  clearly  associated  with
motivation.  Some  of  these  are:  first,  the  learner  has  positive  task  orientation. Heshe is willing to tackle tasks and challenges, and has confidence in his or her
success.  Second,  the  learner  has  ego  involvement.  Heshe  finds  it  important  to succeed in learning in order to maintain and promote hisher own self image. Then
the  learner  also  has  a  need  for  achievement.  Heshe  has  a  need  to  achieve,  to overcome difficulties and succeed in what he or she ought to do.
Next,  the  learner  has  high  aspiration.  Heshe  is  ambitious,  goes  for demanding  challenges,  high  proficiencies,  top  grades.  Fifth,  the  learner  has  goal
orientation.  Heshe  is  very  aware  of  the  goals  of  learning  or  of  specific  learning activities, and directs his or her efforts towards achieving them. While the sixth,
the learner has perseverance. Heshe consciously  invests a high level of effort in learning,  and  is  not  discouraged  by  setback  or  apparent  lack  of  progress.  Lastly,
the  learner  has  tolerance  ambiguity.  Heshe  is  not  disturbed  or  frustrated  by situation  involving  a  temporary  lack  of  understanding  or  confusion;  heshe  can
live with these patiently, in the confidence that understanding will come later. Then,  the  third  one  is  the  students’  environment.  Environment  is  an
important factor in gaining the speaking skill. One of the reasons for his failure to
xxxviii
learn or maintain his second language is no contact between the learners and the community in which the language is spoken. The components of this factor can be
home environment, school environment, community environment, etc. Based  on  the  statements  above,  it  can  be  concluded  that  the  successful
student depends on their interest, motivation, and environment surrounding them. It  means  that  the  students  should  motivate  themselves  to  achieve  English,
although there are extrinsic factors influencing their study. However, the intrinsic interest and motivation has stronger influence than extrinsic ones.
6. Task Types of Speaking Activities
It has been admitted before that the students who study a language have a desire  to  speak  a  language.  There  are  many  activities  which  can  support  the
speaking skill. It is stated by Yusnani Lubis in Suharno, 1998: 27 that there are fourteen types of communicative activities. But in this case, it would be explained
four of them: retelling a story, role-play, dialogue and drama. a. Retelling story is an oral activity to retell a certain topic which is from a simple
story that is easily to be kept remembers, either in reading or writing forms. b. Role-play is a sort act in language learning that the students should be asked to
imagine themselves in a situation which could occur outside the classroom or they should be asked to adopt a specific role in his  situation, even sometimes
they should behave as if the situations are really exist, in accordance with their roles.
xxxix
c.  Dialogue  is  a  short  conversation  between  two  persons.  It  can  be  presented  as language model in the manipulative phase of language learning. The learners in
this  case  are  grouped  into  pairs.  The  teacher’s  role  is  to  prepare  the  students linguistically  for  what  they  have  to  say  and  to  provide  props  which  serve  as
stimuli for conversation. In this case the learner is given a task to fill in a form which  contains  the  information  about  his  partner.  In  order  to  do  this,  each
learner  in  turn  must  ask  question  and  supply  answer.  As  a  final  activity, random learners are asked to tell in narrative form.
d. Drama is a more formalized form of role-play, with a preplanned story line and script.  Sometimes  small groups  may  prepare  their  own  short  dramatization  of
some even, writing the script and rehearsing the scene as a group. This may be more  commonly  referred  to  as  a  “skit”.  Longer  more  involved  dramatic
performances  have been shown to have positive  effects  on language learning, but  they  are  time  consuming  and  rarely  can  form  part  of  a  typical  school
curriculum. According  to  Scrivener  1994:  69,  there  are  six  types  of  drama  activity
which are commonly found in English language teaching classrooms: a.  Role-play. Students act out small scenes using their own ideas or from
ideas and information on role-cards. b.  Simulation.  This  is  really  a  large-scale  role  play.  Role-cards  are
normally used and there is often background information as well. The intention is to create a much more complete, complex ‘world’, say of a
business company, television studio, government body, etc.
xl
c.  Drama  games.  Short  games  that  usually  involve  movement  and imagination.
d.   Guided improvisation. A scene is improvised. One by one the students join  in  character,  until  the  whole  scene  and  possibly  story  take  on  a
life of their own. e.  Acting play scripts. Short written sketches or scenes are acted by the
students. f.    Prepared  improvised  drama.  Students  in  small  groups  invent  and
rehearse a short scene or story that they then perform for the others.
7. Testing Speaking
Speaking  is  a  part  of  our  daily  activity  that  most  of  it  takes  the  form  of face to face dialog, so speaking involves interaction Thornburry, 1998: 8. In line
with this, speaking test is different from the type of written test for it has specific features  to  apply.  Weir  1998:  73  suggests  that  testing  speaking  should  be  built
on  a
number
of  dynamic  characteristics  of  actual  communication  such  as unpredictable,  in  a  realistic  context,  involving  interaction,  purposive,  interesting
and motivating; with positive washback effect on the material preceded test. There  are  many  techniques  to  conduct  oral  or  spoken  test.  The  most
commonly  used  spoken  test  types  are  suggested  by  Thornburry  2005:  124-125 as follows:
a.  Interviews
xli
An interview is conducted by calling out individuals one by one for their interviews.  Interview  is  easy  to  set  up  but  it  is  not  conductive  to  test
informal, conversational speaking style. The effect of interviewer, such as style of questioning is difficult to eliminate.
b.   Live monologue The  candidates  prepare  and  present  a  short  talk  on  a  pre-selected  topic.
This  type  of  test  eliminates  the  interviewer  effect  and  provides  evidence of the candidates’s ability to handle on extended turn, which is not always
possible  in  interviews.  Other  students  can  be  involved  as  audience  in question and answer session so the speaker’s ability to speak interactively
and spontaniously can be coped in the test. c.  Recorded monologues
Recorded monologue is  less stressful than a more public performance.  It is more practicable than  life-monologue.  Learners can record themselves
on cetain topic talk. The assessment of recorded monologue can be done after the event, and the result can be triangulated.
d.  Role plays A learner must perform a certainrole in a classroom. Another role can be
performed by another student or teacher. e.  Collaborative tasks and discussions
xlii
These are similar to arole plays except that the learners are not required to assume  a  role  but  simply  to  be  themselves.  The  learner’s  interactive  can
be  observed  in  circumstances  that  closely  appoximate  real-life  language use.
Thornburry 2005: 127 proposes two main ways of scoring in spoken test: holistic scoring and analytic scoring. In holistic scoring, a single score is given on
the  basis  of  overal  scoring.  In  analytical  scoring,  a  separate  score  is  given  for different aspects of the task. Holistic scoring is quicker to apply; it is adequate for
informal  testing  of  progress.  Holistic  scoring  requires  the  involvement  of  more than one scorer. Analytic scoring is longer and it compels testers to take a variety
of  factors  into  account.  However,  the  scorer  may  be  distracted  by  all  the categories and lose sight of the overall picture.
In line with the describtion above, Madsen 1983: 167 states that holistic scoring  is  used  to  evaluate  a  wide  variety  of  criteria  simultaneously  such  as
appropriateness, fluency, grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation. He states that the  holistic  scoring  concentrates  on  communication  while  not  overlooking  the
components of speech. In this type of scoring, the rating scale can be adapted for the use of teachers, and teachers can prepare their own scale Madsen, 1983: 169-
170. The scale is applied to achieve the consistency in scoring.
Table 2.1 Criteria of Fluency proficiency by Madsen Score
Indicator 21-25
Fluent communication 16-20
Good communcation 11-15
Satisfactory 6-10
Communication hesitant 0-5
Communication minimal
xliii
Table 2.2 Criteria of vocabulay proficiency by Madsen Score
Indicator 21-25
Wholly appropriate 16-20
Few limmitation 11-15
Sometimes limited 6-10
Limitation affected the task 0-5
Inadequate for the task Table 2.3 Criteria of Grammar proficiency by Madsen
Score Indicator
21-25 Clear and appropriate use of grammar
16-20 Few inaccurance grammar
11-15 Inaccuracy of grammar do not serously impede understanding
6-10 Inacuracy of grammar do not impede understanding
0-5 Inacuracy of grammar makes understanding almost impossible
Table 2.4 Criteria of Pronunciation proficiency by Madsen Score
Indicator 21-25
Clear pronunciation 16-20
Few inaccurate pronunciation 11-15
Inacuracy of pronunciation do not seriously impede understanding 6-10
Inaccuracy of pronunciation do not impede understanding 0-5
Inaccuracy  of  pronunciation  makes  understanding  almost impossible
Hughes  2003:  131-132  designs  a  scale  to  score  speaking.  In  Hughes scale,  the  students  are  tested  on  comphrehension,  fluency,  grammar,  vocabulary,
and  pronunciation.  They  can  get  a  maximum  of  ten  scoring  in  each  of  these aspects. The scoring rubric by Hughes are as follows the more detail data can be
seen in Table 3:
Table 2.5 scoring rubric  of speaking test by Hughes Pronunciation.
Grammar Fluency
Vocabulary. Comprehension.
xliv
1-10 1-10
1-10 1-10
1-10
It  is  stated  by  Ur  1996:  34  that  there  are  nine  reasons  for  conducting  a test. A test can be used as a means to:
a.  Give the teacher information about where the students are at the moment, to help to decide what to teach;
b.  Give  the  students  information  about  what  they  know,  so  that  they  also have an awareness of what they need to learn or review;
c.  Asses for some purposes external to current teaching a final grade for the course, selection;
d.  Motivate students to learn or review specific materials; e.  Get a noisy class to keep quiet and concentrate;
f.  Provide a clear indication that class has reached “station” in learning, such as the end of a unit, thus contributing a sense of structure in the course as a
whole; g.  Get students to make an effort in doing the test itself, which is likely to
lead to better result and feeling of satisfaction; h.  Give  students  task  which  themselves  may  actually  provide  useful  review
or practice, as well as testing; i.  Provide  students  with  a  sense  of  achievement  and  progress  in  their
learning.
xlv
Ur  1996:  135  designs  a  scale  to  score  speaking  test.  In  Ur  scale,  the students  are  tested  on  fluency  and  accuracy.  They  can  get  maximum  of  five  in
each of these aspects and ten points in all. Table 2. 6 Ur’s speaking test scale
Accuracy Fluency
Little or no language is produced. Poor vocabulary, mistakes in basic
grammar, may have very strong foreign accent.
Adequate but rich vocabulary, makes obvious grammar mistakes, slight foreign
accent. 1
2
3 Little or no communication.
Very hesitant and brief utterances, sometimes difficult to understand.
Get idea across, but hesitaantly and briefly
1 2
3 Good range of vocabulary, occational
grammar slips, slight foreign accent. Wide vocabulary appropriately used,
virtually no grammar mistakes, native- like or slight foreign accent
4 5
Effective communication in short turn. Easy and effective communication, uses
long turns, 4
5
Out of the speaking scales stated by Madsen, Hughes and Ur above, there are  many  other  scales  in  assessing  speaking  performance.  The  ranges  of  scores
and  the  kinds  of  skills  included  may  be  not  the  same.  But,  as  a  whole,  what  is evaluated  in  speaking  test  is  ability  of  English  such  as  pronunciation,  grammar,
vocabulary,  fluency,  and  comprehension.  Based  on  the  language  components which  are  evaluated  in  the  research,  the  researcher  decided  to  use  Hughes’s
speaking skill because these five aspects of speaking were completely stated.
B. The Nature of Acting Play Scripts Technique 1. The Meaning of Acting Play Scripts
According to Scrivener 1994: 69, APS is short written sketches or scenes which are acted out by the students in front of the class. It is an excellent way to
xlvi
get  students  to  use  the  language.  It  essentially  involves  using  the  imagination  to make oneself into another character, or the classroom into a different place. It can
be a starting point for exciting listening and speaking work and it can be utilized as  a  tool  to  provide  practice  in  specific  grammatical,  lexical,  functional  or
phonological areas. Related to the theory above APS can improve the learners’ speaking skill
in  any  situation,  and  help  the  learners  to  interact.  As  for  the  shy  learners,  APS help  by  providing  a  mask,  where  learners  with  the  difficulty  in  conversation  are
liberated. In addition, it is fun and most learners will agree that enjoyment leads to better learning. Therefore, based on the above description, the writer believes that
APS can give an appropriate contribution to solve the students’ English speaking problem.
2. The Reasons for Choosing Acting Play Scripts
APS  is  chosen  as  one  of  the  tasks  in  the  teaching  activities  to  create  the situation  for  learners  to  actively  interact  in  the  language,  thereby  making  the
learning language more meaningful. At the same time, the learners are introduced to the different styles-listening, remembering, discussing, writing, and presenting.
The  students  are  hoped  to  be  able  to  improve  and  enhance  their  own  ability  in mastering  of  speaking  competence  in  their  daily  life  communicatively  and
actively. The  following  is  the  main  reason  stated  by  Scrivener  1994:  69  that
bringing the outside world into the classroom in this way we can provide a lot of useful  practice  in  cafes,  shops,  banks,  streets,  zoos,  parties,  etc.  that  would
xlvii
otherwise impossible. There can also be a freeing from the constraints of culture and  expected  behavior;  this  can  be  personally  and  linguistically  very  liberating.
Curiously,  it  is  sometimes  the  shyest  students  who  are  most  able  to  seize  the potential.
Next,  some  people  are  learning  English  to  prepare  for  specific  roles  in their lives: people who are going to work or travel in an international context. It is
helpful  for  these  students  to  have  tried  out  and  experimented  with  the  language they  will  require  in  the  friendly  and  safe  environment  of  a  classroom.  For  these
students, APS is very useful dress rehearsal for real life. It enables them not only to acquire set phrases, but also to learn how interaction might take place in variety
of situations. Furthermore,  APS  helps  shy  students  by  providing  them  with  a  mask.
Some  more  shy  members  of  a  group  may  have  a  great  deal  of  difficulty participating  in  conversation  about  themselves,  and  in  other  activities  based  on
their direct  experience.  These students  are deliberated by APS as  they  no longer feel that their own personality is involved.
The most important reason for using APS is that it is fun and motivating. Quieter students get the chance to express themselves in a more open. The world
of the classroom is broadened to include the outside world – thus offering a much wider  range  of  language  opportunities.  Lastly,  the  real  situations  can  be  created
and the students can take the benefits from the practice. 3. The Steps to Run an APS Technique.
xlviii
According to Scrivener 2004: 70, APS technique provides the possibility of  practicing  a  lot  of  vocabularies  in  a  useful  and  interesting  way.  There  is  also
scope  for  use  of  functional  language  like:  apologizing,  refusing,  offering  help, asking  for  opinion,  agreeing  disagreeing,  denying,  praising,  congratulating,  etc.
That  is  why;  he  gives  some  guidelines  to  run  this  technique.  The  steps  are  as follows:
a.  Make  sure  that  the  students  understand  the  idea  of  APS.  The  teachers should  explain  to  the  students  that  they  know  what  is  going  to  happen,
what should they do and whether they are comfortable to do that or not. b.  Make sure that the situation is clear.
c.  Allow the students to write the scripts in the right structure, let them open the dictionary to find the proper words, and also give time to memorize the
scripts. d.  Give them time to prepare their ideas before the speaking starts
e.  And at last, when the activity of speaking starts, encourage the students to improve  rather  than  rely  on  prepared  scripts.  This  condition  will  make
them more relax and could create a natural situation in class. 4. Teacher’s Role in Acting Play Scripts
It  is  stated  by  Brown  2001:  167-168  that  there  is  a  spectrum  of possibilities of teacher’s roles which are more conducive to creating on interactive
classroom.
xlix
a.  The teacher as controller In  this  role,  teacher  is  a  “master”  controller,  always  in  charge  of  every
moment in the classroom. Master controller determines  what the students do, when they should speak, and what language forms they should use. A
teacher  can  often  predict  many  students’  responses  because  everything  is mapped out ahead of time.
b.  The teacher is the director The  teacher  is  like  a  conductor  of  an  orchestra  so  the  teacher’s  job  is  to
keep the process flowing smoothly and efficiently.
c.  The teacher as manager The  teacher  is  as  one  who  plans  lessons,  modules,  and  courses  and  who
structures the larger, longer segments of classroom time. d.  The teacher as facilitator
A  less  directive  role  might  be  described  as  facilitating  the  process  of learning, of making learning easier for students. The facilitator capitalizes
on  the  principle  of  intrinsic  motivation  by  allowing  students  to  discover language through using it pragmatically, rather than by telling them about
language. e.  The teacher as resource
l
In this role, the teacher is available for advice and counsel when they look for it.
C. Related Research
The research which will be done in SMP Negeri 1 Kalitidu is related to the previous  research  done  by  Anis  Dian  SMA  Negeri  2  Bojonegoro  and  Suharno
from SMP Negeri 1 Wonogiri. Both of the researchers conducted this research in improving students’ speaking skill through Role Play and Small Group Work. It is
clear that Role Play and Small Group Work problem solving in decision making belong to communication activities.
1.  The  research  done  by  Anis  Dian  Hartini,  entitled  “Improving  Speaking Performance  of  the  Second  Year  Students  at  SMA  Negeri  2  Bojonegoro
Trough Small Group Work”. In the year 2007, proved that Small Group Work is effective to: 1 Increase the number of students who activity involved in the
speaking activity; 2 Increase students’ confidence and self- initiatives to use English  for  their  oral  communication.  The  students  make  a  progress  or
improvement  in  some  aspects  of  language  components,  mainly  Grammar, vocabulary,  fluency,  comprehensibility,  and  pronunciation;  3  to  create  a
good and natural class atmosphere; 4 to create a cooperative situation among students;  and  5  to  provide  students  ample  opportunities  to  practice  their
English orally in more natural and interactive situation. 2.  The  research  done  by  Suharno,  entitled  “Improving  students’  English
Speaking  Using  Role  Play”  in  the  year  2007,  proved  that  Role  Play  is effectively  increase  students’  motivation  and  interest  to  study  English
li
especially English Speaking. The use of Role Play improved and enhanced the students’  speaking  competence.  And  the  last,  the  use  of  Role  Play  teaching
technique  really  improves  the  students’  achievement  in  Learning  English especially in English Speaking.
Moreover,  Kemmis  states  that  classroom  action  research  is  a  concept  of doing X to improve Y. It is held because there is one or more problems found in
something  or  because  the  belief  that  the  condition  of  something  is  not  good  and needs improvement Ngadiso in Siti Zulaihah, 2007: 3. In this case Acting Play
Scripts is the X variable while speaking skill is the Y variable. The researcher will apply  APS  technique  to  improve  students’  speaking  skill.  The  researcher  will
record all the students’ activities regarding their attitude, respond and progress in speaking  skill.  The  research  will  be  implemented  in  the  form  of  collaborative
action research by inviting one of the English teachers in SMP Negeri 1 Kalitidu. This  research  will  be  done  in  four  steps  of  planning,  acting,  observing,  and
reflecting.
D. Teaching Speaking Using Acting Play Script Technique