50 Appendix 5. Cost benefit analysis of soma pajeko by outboard vessels
No Investment
SizeNumber Value Rp
Official Statement A.
Investment cost
1. Fishing boat 15.5 X 3.6 X 1.9 m
65,000,000 2. Fishing gear
350 X 70 m 115,000,000
3. Outboard motor Rp 20.000.000 3 unit 40 PK
60,000,000 4. Winch here is called takal
1 unit 7,500,000
5. Fish aggregating device Rp 10.000.000 3 unit 20 mil
30,000,000 2 years
6. Generator 1 unit
2,500,000 7. Pompa alkon
1 unit 2,500,000
8. Navigation device 2 unit
5,000,000
Sub Total 287,500,000
B . Fixed cost per years
1. Maintainance 18,000,000
2. Reduction of motor 20 12,000,000
3. Reduction of fishing boat 20 13,000,000
4. Reduction of fishing gear 10 11,500,000
5. Reduction of FAD 50 15,000,000
6. Reduction of winch 20 1,500,000
7. Reduction of generator 20 500,000
8. Reduction of pompa alkon 20 500,000
9. Reduction o f navigation device 10 500,000
Sub Total 72,500,000
C. Variable cost
1. Kerosene Rp 2.550 100 liters
255,000 2. Gasoline Rp 5.000
10 liters 50,000
3. Oli Rp 15.000 5 liters
75,000 4. Ice Rp 15.000
10 block 150,000
5. Consumption of ABK 20 person
100,000
Sub Total 630,000
D. Variable cost per year
144 trip
90,720,000 E.
Number of fixed cost
B + D 163,220,000
F. Revenue per trip
Little tuna Rp.5.000 600 Kg
3,000,000 G .
Revenue per years 1. Revenue
144 trip
432,000,000 2. Revenue minus retribution
2.50
421,200,000 3. Net revenue
257,980 ,000 4. Benefit level
158
on persen
5. Visibility level 2.58
6. Break event point 13.37
on month
51 Appendix 6. Bioeconomic analysis of little tuna using Schaefer model
Year Harvest
ton Effort
trip CPUE
tontrip Year
Harvest ton
Effort trip
CPUE tontrip
1986 283.00
2,205 0.13
1997 444.50
4,615 0.10
1987 320.70
2,601 0.12
1998 594.60
3,529 0.17
1988 321.60
2,776 0.12
1999 493.70
3,372 0.15
1989 378.70
2,554 0.15
2000 395.50
2,842 0.14
1990 363.00
2,626 0.14
2001 514.10
6,517 0.08
1991 318.70
1,729 0.18
2002 719.40
5,310 0.14
1992 318.50
1,903 0.17
2003 751.20
11,215 0.07
1993 345.30
3,802 0.09
2004 994.60
12,104 0.08
1994 324.60
4,848 0.07 Sum
8,766.00 82,303
2.31
1995 531.90
3,805 0.14 Mean
461.40 4,332
0.12
1996 352.30
3,950 0.09 n
19 SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics Multiple R
0.669876057 R Square
0.448733932 Adjusted R
Square 0.416306516
Standard Error
0.027148666 Observations
19
ANOVA
df SS
MS F
Significance F Regression
1 0.010199375
0.010199375 13.8381034
0.001702426 Residual
17 0.012529851
0.00073705 Total
18 0.022729227
Coefficients Standard
Error t Stat
P-value Lower 95
Upper 95 Lower 95.0
Upper 95.0
Intercept 0.157464832
0.011526057 13.66163977
1.35106E-10 0.133146979
0.181782686 0.133146979
0.1817827 X Variable 1
-8.32863E-06 2.2389E-06
-3.719960134 0.001702426
-1.30523E-05 -3.60496E-06
-1.30523E-05 -3.605E-06
Economic Parameters Biological Parameters
Parameter s Estimation
Parameters Estimations
c 630,000
r 1.49
p 5,000,000
q 8 x 10
-5
d 0.17
K ton 2,000
E
MSY
= 9,453
trip MSY =
744.27 ton per year
E
OAY
= 3,778
trip OAY =
476.02 ton per year
E
MEY
= 1,889
trip MEY =
267.73 ton per year
52
Optimal biomass, catch and effort levels in response to change in the biological parameters K, q and r
K q
r X
OSY E
OSY
TR TC
Profit
100 0.00157465 29.770996
89.99 268.15
1,892 1,340,743,424
1,192,154,753 148,588,671
200 0.00078732 14.885498
179.95 268.57
1,896 1,342,848,393
1,194,261,122 148,587,272
300 0.00052488 9.9236653
269.87 268.99
1,899 1,344,945,804
1,196,360,854 148,584,950
400 0.00039366 7.4427489
359.75 269.41
1,902 1,347,035,692
1,198,453,977 148,581,715
500 0.00031493 5.9541992
449.60 269.82
1,906 1,349,118,092
1,200,540,518 148,577,575
600 0.00026244 4.9618326
539.42 270.24
1,909 1,351,193,042
1,202,620,504 148,572,539
700 0.00022495 4.2529994
629.20 270.65
1,912 1,353,260,577
1,204,693,962 148,566,615
800 0.00019683 3.7213745
718.95 271.06
1,915 1,355,320,732
1,206,760,920 148,559,811
900 0.00017496 3.3078884
808.66 271.47
1,919 1,357,373,541
1,208,821,405 148,552,137
1,000 0.00015746 2.9770996
898.34 271.88
1,922 1,359,419,041
1,210,875,442 148,543,599
2,000 7.87E-05
1.48854979 1,793.29
275.90 1,954
1,379,479,556 1,231,067,006
148,412,550 3,000 5.2488E-05
0.9923665 2,685.00
279.77 1,985
1,398,846,152 1,250,642,328
148,203,824 4,000 3.9366E-05
0.7442749 3,573.63
283.51 2,015
1,417,550,744 1,269,626,140
147,924,603 5,000 3.1493E-05
0.5954199 4,459.31
287.12 2,045
1,435,623,522 1,288,042,051
147,581,471 6,000 2.6244E-05
0.4961833 5,342.17
290.62 2,073
1,453,093,051 1,305,912,587
147,180,464 7,000 2.2495E-05
0.4252999 6,222.33
294.00 2,100
1,469,986,366 1,323,259,250
146,727,115 8,000 1.9683E-05
0.3721374 7,099.93
297.27 2,127
1,486,329,060 1,340,102,559
146,226,500 9,000 1.7496E-05
0.3307888 7,975.06
300.43 2,153
1,502,145,371 1,356,462,097
145,683,273 10,000 1.5746E-05
0.29771 8,847.83
303.49 2,178
1,517,458,257 1,372,356,557
145,101,700
53 Appendix 7. Summary of stakeholder analysis
Importance Level Influence Level
No Continuum
Level Stakeholders Groups
1 2
3 4
5 6
Average 1
2 3
4 5
Average
Directorate General of Capture Fisheries, MMAF
1 2
4 1
1 1
1.67
3 7
6 6
6
5.60
1 National
Directorate General of Small Island, Coastal and Marine , MMAF
1 1
6 1
1 1
1.83
2 2
7 5
5
4.20
Marine and Fisheries Service 3
4 5
3 3
1
3.17
4 6
5 5
5
5.00
Regional Development and Planning Board 1
1 5
3 1
1
2.00
2 3
4 2
2
2.60
2 Regional
Academic 1
1 4
1 2
1
1.67
1 1
6 3
4
3.00
Regional Legislative 1
1 3
2 1
1
1.50
7 6
6 5
6
6.20
Fisheries and Marine Service s 4
5 6
4 7
3
4.83
7 5
6 5
7
6.00
Regional Planning and Development Board 1
2 5
4 2
1
2.50
5 6
5 4
4
4.80 Infrastructure a nd Settlement Services
