digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
used by the characters in the movie. In the third position absolute homonymy 19,14. This type happens when the characters use words which have more than
one meaning and the meaning are different or unrelated. Then, the last position is homograph 12,76. Homograph happens when there are two words have the same
written form used by the character in the script. It means the ambiguity occurs in the matter of sound in which it can make listener have multiple interpretations.
There are some structural ambiguity happen Zootopia movie. Therefore, understanding the structural aspect, the writer knows the meaning of the phrase and
understanding the structure of the phrase in the object. Over the analysis of structural ambiguity in Zootopia movie there are 6 data of structural ambiguity found in this
research. The writer found some types of ambiguity. In phrase there are two types of phrase, including 4 data of noun phrase 9 and 2 data of adjectival phrase 5.
The most dominant types between lexical and structural ambiguity in this research is lexical ambiguity which produced for 41 times or 87 in out of 47 total numbers of
data.
5.2 Suggestions
Ambiguity is an interesting phenomenon to learn and to analyze. It can happen in any situation whether in daily conversation or in written sources.
Sometimes people likes to make their listeners or readers confused of what they speak or write, Because theres some advantages that they want to get for example: in
advertisement and in literature the writer usually uses it to beautify review their works.
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
However, there are some people too accidentally do make their listeners readers feel confused. This ambiguity depends on the knowledge of the listener
reader, if they have a wide knowledge, it may be possible to avoid this case. Through this thesis, it is recommended that the readers may have discussed another subject
such as phonetic ambiguity since this thesis only discusses about lexical and structural ambiguity. Hopefully, by doing this, it will expand our knowledge not only
about lexical and structural ambiguity in Zootopia movie, but also about phonetic ambiguity in other sources.
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
REFERENCES
Bordwell, D., Thompson, K. 2008. Film Art: An Introduction 8
th
Edition. Boston; London: McGraw Hill.
Chaer, A. 2007. LinguistikUmum. Jakarta: RinekaCipta. Creswell, J. W. 1994. Research Design: Qualitative Quantitative approaches.
Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publication. Cruse, A. D. 2000. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and
pragmatics. Oxford University Press. Crystal, D. 1980. A First Dictionary of linguistics and Phonetics. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. Eastwood, J. 2012.
Oxford Learner’s Pocket Grammar, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Ervas, F., Elisabetta, G., Ledda, A., Sergioli, G. 2015. Lexical ambiguity in elementary inferences: an experimental study. University of Cagliari.
Glass, G. V., Hopkins, K. D. 1984. Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology 2
nd
Edition. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., Marslen, W. 2002. Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access.Journal ofMemory and Language
USA Elsevier Science, 46. pp. 245 –266
Hamidy, Y. M. 2009. Some Cases of Ambiguity in English. MajallahDaily, 38 Hurford, J., Heasley, B. 1983. Semantics: A Course Book. Cambridge: Cambridge
University. Jackson, H., Etienne, Z. A. 2000. Words, Meaning, and Vocabulary: An
Introduction to Modern English Lexicology. New York: Continuum. Kapadia, D., Jufrizal. 2013. Types of Semantic Ambiguity Found in the Editorials of
Jakarta Post Daily Newspaper.English Language and Literature E-Journal ISSN 2302-3546.
Kempson, R. M. 1997. Semantic Theory. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press. Kreidler, C.W. 1998. Introducing English Semantics. New York: Routledge Press
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
Kristianty, S. 2006. The Structural and Lexical Ambiguity Found in Cleo Magazine Advertisements. Undergraduated Thesis. Surabaya: Universitas Petra.
Leech, G. 1981. Semantics: The Study of Meaning. London: Penguin Books Lutviana, R., Alif, S. 2012.The Failure in Translating Humor: A Case Study in the
Diary of A Wimpy Kid. State University of Malang. Lyons, J. 1983. Language, Meaning and Context. Suffolk: Richard Cay, TheChauser
Press. Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics, Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Maharani, I. M. 2012. A Study Of Ambiguity In The Articles Of “Life Times”
Column In The Jakarta Globe Newspaper. Published Undergraduate Thesis. Muhammadiyah University. Surakarta.
Merriam, S. B. 2009. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Fransisco, CA: John Wiley Sons
Missikova, G. 2009. PragmaticDimensions in Literary Text: A Comparative Perspective in: Coherence and Cohesion in Spoken and Written Discourse.
Newcastle UponTyme: Cambridge Scholar Publishing. Murphy, M.L. 2010. Lexical Meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pateda, M. 2001. SemantikLeksikal. Jakarta: PT RinekaCipta Palmer. F. R. 1976. Semantics: A New Outline. London: Cambridge University Press.
Purwaningsih, D. 2014. An Analysis of Lexical and Structural Ambiguity “RubrikOpini” In Jawa Pos. Published Undergraduate Theses. Wijaya Putra
University. Surabaya.
Ramadani, N. 2015. Lexical Ambiguity In The Headlines Of The Jakarta Post Newspaper. Vivid Journal Vol. 4, No. 1. English Department,
AndalasUniversity. Rekha, A. 2014. Ambiguity Found in Passport to the World 2: A Fun and Easy
English book; Content Analysis. Published Undergraduate Theses. Muhammadiyah University. Surakarta.
Ullman, S. 1977. Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford: Basil Blachwell.
Wierzbicka, A. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. New York; Oxford University Press
