Data Analysis ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

41

CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

4.1 Data Analysis

As it had mentioned in the third chapter, the researcher carry on the field research. In this analysis, the data was collected from grade IX of “Bimbel Medica” learners at Jl. Iskandar Muda no.19A Medan. Researcher had taken 30 learners randomly from three classes. Each class consisted of 10 learners. In testing their ability, researcher gave 30 questions. The researcher gave a multiple choice test, which was focused on elliptical sentences. This test consisted of 30 questions, each of elliptical sentences had certain 42 questions; for positive elliptical, it had ten questions of multiple choice test, negative elliptical had ten questions of multiple choice test and opposite elliptical had ten questions of multiple choice test. The researcher put the questions at random as it can be seen below. Table 4.1 Elliptical Sentences function and each questions No Type of Elliptical Sentences Multiple Choice Number of Items 1 Positive elliptical 1-10 10 2 Negative elliptical 11-20 10 3 Opposite elliptical 21-30 10 First, it was needed to tabulate the scores of learners’ data. In scoring the test, the researcher used the formula of Nurkancana and Sumartana 1986 technique of data analysis : The formula: N = X ′ X .Y x 100 N : the outcomes of the learners’ answer X’: the result of correct answer X : the number of learners Y : the number of question 43 In finding the average level of learners competency, the researcher categorize the score into five levels, they are as follows: Excellent 91-100 Very Good 80-89 Good 71-79 Bad 60-70 Very Bad 0-59 Table 4.2 The Result of Positive Elliptical Construction Pre Test Number of question A B C D True answer 1 25 A 2 5 2 23 C 3 22 3 5 A 4 26 3 1 A 5 19 6 2 3 A 6 20 2 A 7 3 15 2 7 B 8 18 2 6 2 A 9 14 2 3 A 10 24 A 44 N 1 = result of correct answer X ′ number of student X . number of question Y x 100 = 206 30 .10 x 100 = 68,7 Table 4.3 The Result of Positive Elliptical Construction Post Test Number of question A B C D True answer 1 30 A 2 2 2 26 C 3 23 3 4 A 4 25 3 1 A 5 24 1 2 3 A 6 24 2 1 3 A 7 3 23 2 B 8 21 2 6 1 A 9 25 2 3 A 10 30 A N 2 = result of correct answer X ′ number of student X . number of question Y x 100 = 251 30 .10 x 100 = 83,7 So, �� avarage = �� + �2 2 = 68,7 + 83,7 2 45 = 76 rounded From the table and the result above, researcher had known that most of the learners could answer positive elliptical construction questions correctly. The score is 76, it means that the ability of the learners in mastering positive construction question is “good”. Table 4.4 The Result of Negative Elliptical Construction Pre Test Number of question A B C D True answer 11 9 3 3 15 D 12 1 24 3 2 B 13 4 2 22 2 C 14 13 16 1 A 15 13 2 3 12 D 16 8 5 3 14 D 17 24 D 18 22 D 19 2 22 D 20 25 B N 1 = result of correct answer X ′ number of student Y . number of question Y x 100 = 193 30 .10 x 100 = 64,3 Table 4.5 The Result of Negative Elliptical Construction Post Test 46 Number of question A B C D True answer 11 5 25 D 12 27 B 13 6 2 20 2 C 14 24 1 5 A 15 8 2 23 D 16 8 5 3 22 D 17 3 2 25 D 18 2 3 25 D 19 2 27 D 20 28 B N 2 = result of correct answer X ′ number of student Y . number of question Y x 100 = 247 30 .10 x 100 = 82,3 So, �� avarage = �� + �2 2 = 64,3 + 82,3 2 = 73 rounded From the table and the result above, researcher had been known that most of the learners can answer negative elliptical construction questions correctly. The score is 73, it means that the ability of the learners in mastering negative elliptical construction question is “good”. 47 Table 4.6 The Result of Opposite Elliptical Construction Pre Test Number of question A B C D True answer 21 30 A 22 2 2 2 24 D 23 22 2 3 3 A 24 7 3 23 C 25 13 12 3 2 B 26 8 5 3 14 D 27 24 1 5 A 28 23 4 3 A 29 22 8 C 30 30 A N 2 = result of correct answer X ′ number of student X . number of question Y x 100 = 224 30 .10 x 100 = 74,7 Table 4.7 The Result of Opposite Elliptical Construction Post Test Number of question A B C D True answer 21 30 A 22 1 2 27 D 23 28 2 3 3 A 24 30 C 48 25 26 2 2 B 26 1 3

26 D

27 28 1 1 A 28 30 A 29 20 10 C 30 30 A N 2 = result of correct answer X ′ number of student X . number of question Y x 100 = 275 30 .10 x 100 = 91,7 So, �� avarage = �� + �2 2 = 74,7 + 91,7 2 = 83 rounded From the table and the result above, researcher had known most of the learners who can answer the opposite elliptical construction questions correctly. The score is 83, it means that the ability of the learners in mastering opposite elliptical construction question is “very good”. Moreover, researcher can said that the learners find it more easier in answer opposite elliptical construction question than other type of questions. For the purpose, it is first needed to tabulate the scores of each student firstly. In scoring the test, the researcher used the formula of Nurkancana and Sumartana 1986 as follows : X = R x 100 49 N In which: X = Individual score R = The number of correct answers N = Number of questions Table 4.8 are arranged based on the result of scoring the test and on the highest to the smallest to distribute learners’ scores in sequence as follows. Table 4.8 The Highest to the Smallest Scores No. Name of the Learners Total the Correct SCORE X Pre Test Post Test average 1. Delima Pardede 30 30 30 100 2. Jewel Mendagi 30 30 30 100 3. Joyce Bintang 27 30 28.5 95 4. Ega Malinda 26 30 28 93 5. Yolanda A S 25 30 27.5 91 6. Afri Damayanti 24 30 27 90 7. Jesica Ziliwu 24 29 26.5 88 8. Galang Topan P 23 28 25.5 85 9. Devi Ratu A 22 28 25 83 10. Andi Kurnia 24 26 25 83 11. Syaiful Fathah 24 26 25 83 12. Syarifah Fauziah 24 26 25 83 13. T. Rahmad Putra 23 26 24.5 82 14 Ester Juliana P 23 25 24 80 50 15 Daniel T B Panjaitan 23 25 24 80 16 Albert Sam Owen 22 25 23.5 78 17 Hesron 22 25 23.5 78 18 Harten 21 25 23 76 19 Monica S P 21 25 23 76 20 Gabriel Peluhisa G 20 24 22 73 21 Vania I A Pelawi 20 24 22 73 22 Andrean Purba 19 24 21.5 72 23 Ade Jeremy Munthe 18 24 21 70 24 Ruspita Sari 18 22 20 68 25 Swandi Pakpahan 17 22 19.5 65 26 Ramona Octavia 17 22 19,5 65 27 Jumpa Agung 17 21 19 63 28 Rizki Adimanatap R 17 20 18,5 62 29 Kristian Abraham 15 18 16.5 55 30 Gidion I Silalahi 14 16 15 50 31 TOTAL 672 756 714 � � = 2340 The scores of the learners were converted to percentages by dividing the total correct answer with the number of all items and multiplied by 100 that is: Outcomes of the scoreN = total of correct answer X ′ number of student X . number of question Y x 100 = 714 30 .30 x 100 51 = 79,3 The percentage of the whole score is 79,3. This percentage implies that the learners are able to answer elliptical Construction question.

4.2 Research Findings