CHAPTER IV CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
A. Conclusions
The result of the research can be concluded that most of students at the third year students of Senior High School at Lembaga Pendidikan Primagama
Lubang Buaya have poor ability in mastering subjunctive and there are a number of problems found by the students in mastering subjunctive, such as the
use of “to be” in present and past subjunctive, the use of incorrect pattern of subjunctive between past tense form for present subjunctive and past perfect
tense for past subjunctive. Besides, there some causes of the problems which
make the students poor in Subjunctive, such as the influence of common grammar like tenses, the teaching methodology used by the teacher, and the lack
of explanation about subjunctive more detail.
B. Suggestions
Based on the conclusion above, the writer proposes some suggestions for the following parties: like the institution Lembaga Pendidikan Primagama
Lubang Buaya to provide book collections of English Grammar at Primagama
library to support the students’ ability of English Grammar especially subjunctive, to provide any different books containing subjunctive from any
different publishers, to provide time for problem solving for the students who don’t understand any English subjects especially subjunctive. Besides, the
English teachers are suggested to improve the effectiveness of teaching methodology by problem solving, and review, to improve learning process in
teaching subjunctive by explaining the difference between patterns of subjunctive and other English subjects clearly. And for the learners to
distinguish the pattern of present and past subjunctive, to know the fact sentence of the present and past subjunctive either in negative or positive sentence.
Finally, the writer hopes this study will be useful for the future improvement of teaching structure, especially “subjunctive” at Primagama.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anonymous, Garis-garis Besar Program Pengajaran GBPP Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan
KTSP 2006, Yogyakarta: Primagama, 2008-2009. Barnhart, Robert K. The Barnhart Concise Dictionary of Etymology. USA: HW.
Wilson Company, 1995. Dewabrata, Paidi. Smart Solution Primagama Bahasa Inggris, Yogyakarta:
Primagama, 1999.
Dewabrata, Paidi and Sudarso. Panduan Belajar 12 SMA IPAIPS, Yogyakarta: Primagama, 2008.
Dewabrata, Paidi, Sudarso and Kinawati Ratna. Sukses SPMB Ringkasan Materi dan
Prediksi Soal-soal SPMB. Jogya: Primagama, 1999.
Dewantara, Aryo. Kumpulan Rumus Lengkap Kelas X, XI dan XII SMA-Rumus
Kantong Matematika SMA, Jakarta: Pustaka Widyatama, 2008.
Farkhan, Muhammad. Penulisan Karya Ilmiah. Jakarta: Cella, 2006. Givon, T. English Grammar A Function-Based Introduction. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins Publishing Company, 1993. Murthy, J. D. Brush up Your English Grammar. New Delhi: Nice Printing
Publishing, 2000. Rahman, Faidlah Ali. Fundamental of English Grammar: a Practical Guide. Jakarta:
Pustaka Widyatama, 2007.
Riduwan. Metode dan Teknik Menyusun Tesis, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2004. Swan, Michael. Practical English Usage. London: Oxford University Press, 1980.
Webster, Merriam. Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. USA: An
Encyclopedia Company, 2003. Webster, Noah. Webster’s New Twentieth Century Dictionary of the English
Language. USA: William Collins and World Publishing Co., Inc, 1979.
http:www. eprints.ums.ac.id. 2009. http:www.primagama.com. 2008.
http:www.telus.netlinguisticsissuessubjunctive. 2008. http:www.wikipedia.orgwikiSubjunctive. 2008.
THE TABULATION OF TEST INSTRUMENT
From the questions, the writer tabulates the data as follows:
1. “You look tired. Why don’t you take a rest?”
“I wish______; I still have to finish this report”. Student
A. I would be able
B. I can
C. I will be able
D. I could