Identification of the Problem

6 learner as an error. 3 It means that mistake is the same as slip of the tongue that is usually only one time happens, and learner who makes a mistake is able to recognize it as a mistake. On the other hand, error usually occurs repeatedly, and learner who makes an error is unable to recognize it as an error hence she or he cannot correct it either. In addition, Brown states that a mistake refers to a performance error that is either a random guess or a “slip” in that it is a failure to utilize a known system correctly. 4 It means that mistakes refers to error performance, and it cause by unsuccessful in using the language system which learner knows. Therefore, when learners do a mistake they can do self-corrected. From the definition above, the writer concludes that mistake and error have different meaning. Mistake occurs because of some aspect of performance, such as lack of attention and carelessness. Learners who makes mistake are able to do self-correction. Whereas, error occurs when there is incomplete learning of the target language, so learner cannot do self-correction. In addition, usually learners make a mistake only one time, but errors occur repeatedly.

B. Error Analysis

Error Analysis is a process based on analysis of learner‟s error in their process of second language learning. According to James, “error analysis is the process of determining the incidence, nature, causes, and consequences of unsuccessful language.” 5 Douglas wrote on his book “Error Analysis is the fact that learners do make error, and that these errors can be observed, and analyzed. Led to sugar of study the learner „errors‟ 6 Error Analysis is the method that can be used to help the 3 Gass and selinker, loc. cit. 4 H.Douglas Brown, Principles of Language learning and Teaching,Fifth Ed,New York: Pearson Education, 2007, p. 217. 5 Carl James, Error in Language Learning and Use, New York: Longman 1998, p.1 6 H. Douglas Brown, Principle of Language Learning and Teaching, fourth edition,New York: Addison Wesley Longman ,2000, p. 218.

Dokumen yang terkait

Analysis on the difficulties passive form in two tenses: simple prent and simple pat

5 20 65

Improving Students’ Understanding Of Passive Voice Of The Simple Past Tense By Using Contextual Teaching And Learning (A Classroom Action Research In The Second Year Of Mts Al-Mujahidin Cikarang, 2012/2013 Academic Year)

2 47 75

Error Analysis in the students writing narrative paragraph at MtsN Pajajaran Pamulang

0 3 45

Presented to the Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher’s Training in a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of S.Pd. (Bachelor of Art) in English Language Education

1 12 102

Improving students’ understanding in using passive voice of the present and past tense through Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL): a classroom action research at eleven-grade SMK Kesehatan Bina Insan Cendekia Karawaci

2 19 108

Error Analysis on Transforming Affirmative to Negative and Interrogative Sentences of Simple Presnt Tense (a case study at SMP YAPERA Ciledug)

2 26 98

An Error Analysis on the Use of Simple Past Tense in Students' Narrative Writing (A Case Study at First Grade Students of SMA Dua Mei Ciputat)

4 51 109

An error analysis on students' simple past tense mastery in their narrative text (a case study at the eleventh grade students of SMAN 4 Bekasi)

1 13 0

An Analysis on Students’ Errors on the Use of Passive Voice in Simple Past Tense, (A Case Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Islam Plus Baitul Maal

2 5 107

An error analysis on simple past tense and perfect tense.

0 0 100