The Findings of the Sixth Semester Students of ELESP Sanata Dharma
36 4
Strongly disagree Open-ended questionnaire present two questions. The questions were about
the comment and the suggestion for the designed test. The findings of the evaluation is presented in the Appendix C.
Overall, the findings of the evaluation shows that the evaluators agree with the statements in the questionnaire. Hence, the designed test is suitable with the
students’ needs. The instruction of the designed test was easy to understand. Then, all of the evaluators agree that the test format was appropriate for the students. The
evaluators also agree that the test items were stated in clear and simple language. Each multiple-question in the test has appropriate answer and distractors. Also, the
test suited with the level of the students. Next, all of the evaluators agree that the language of each item was
sufficiently authentic. The evaluators then state that the number of the test items is sufficient. The evaluators also agree that the test items were arranged systematically
based on the level of difficulty. Hence, the time allocation of the test is suitable with the number of the text. However, there was an evaluator who argues that the time
allocation is not suitable to do to the test. It might because there are too many test items given by the researcher. Meanwhile, it is agreed that the test is easy to score
since it uses the MCQ format. Then, the two evaluators strongly agree that the test is easy to interpret. However, there was an evaluator whose degree of agreement of
the statement is low. The last statement was approved by the evaluators that the test adequately reflects the testing objective. Hence, the designed test accomplish the
test objective. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
37 In conclusion, the overall designed test is good. However there were some
comments and suggestions given by the evaluators. It was suggested that the researcher should give clearer instruction. Then, the test should be more varied to
avoid boredom. The test must measure not only the students’ memory but also the stu
dents’ understanding on vocabulary. Next, the students need to know the purpose of the test. There are also some grammatical issues that need to be fixed. Lastly, it
was suggested that the optional letter should be written in caps A-B-C-D. Feedback, comments, and suggestions from the evaluators were very useful
for the researcher to improve the designed test. Thus, the researcher revised the designed test based on the evaluators’ feedback, comments, and suggestions. The
researcher corrected the grammatical issues in the designed test. Then, the researcher
modified the instruction of the test so it will avoid the students’ misunderstanding and misinterpretation. The researcher also enriches the
instruction and the general purpose of the test. Finally, the researcher changed the optional letter. At first, the researcher wrote the optional letter as a-b-c-d and it
changed to A-B-C-D.