The urgency of the resignation of the Prime Minister.

By those findings, it can be concludes that The New York Times is deeper in elaborating the emotional condition of the Korean people after the disaster rather than The Korea Herald .

4. The irregularities on the operator of the ferry which is related to the disaster

In the aspect of arrangements of subtopic, The Korea Herald more concerns about the opinions about the resignation of the Prime Minister while The New York Times does not mention about it. Then, The Korea Herald adds the description about the ferry sinking while The New York Times adds more about the recent report of the death toll and rescue struggle and the grief of the nation due to the disaster. The Korea Herald employs the lexical items of „rampant „corruption and malpr actices‟‟, „rooted out‟, „revealed‟, „various irregularities‟ while The New York Times employs the lexical items of „criminal charges‟ and „accidental homicides‟. By those lexical items, The Korea Herald tends to elaborate the subtopic of the irregularities which is related to the disaster based on the comments of the prime minister while The New York Times focuses to elaborate this topic only on the irregularities. So, it can be concluded that The Korea Herald is more focus on the Prime Minister‟s comment about the irregularities related to the disaster, while The New York Times focuses on the irregularities on the operator of the ship which cause high death toll

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION

After examining the data, the writer comes to the conclusion. This part is the conclusion of the analysis. In this chapter the writer begins with the conclusion of the first problem formulation about the cohesion of the lexical items and then the second problem formulation about the media viewpoint on the issue of the resignation of South Korea‟s Prime Minister. In the first problem, the writer found that both articles used the cohesive force of reiteration and collocation in the lexical cohesion, and reference and conjunction in grammatical cohesion. Both articles do not use the cohesive force of substitution and ellipsis because both articles tend to presents the text with its detail information and avoid the ambiguity by using the general words. All of the lexical items in both articles use specific words. In the organization of the subtopics, both texts elaborate the discussion about the issue of the resignation of South Korea‟s Prime Minister in 7 subtopics whose the 4 subtopics are similar to the article from The New York Times, while the rest 3 subtopics are different with The New York Times. In the aspect of reiteration, there are 6 lexical items which are reiterated in The Korea Herald . The form of reiteration includes the reiteration of the same lexical items, reiteration of the synonym, and the reiteration of the near-synonym. There is no reiteration in the form of superordinate in The Korea Herald. 50