Recommendations Policy statements from WHO, UNICEF and

Recommendations Policy statements from WHO, UNICEF and

other international and national organizations confirm the importance of providing mother’s own milk to pre-term and SGA infants. Stand- ard practice in neonatal units is to promote mother’s own milk as the feed of choice for all LBW infants. The findings of this review sup- port this recommendation.

SUMMARY TABLE 2.1.1 Effects of mother’s own milk compared with formula feeding on infection or necrotising enterocolitis in LBW infants

Study, Design

Approximate proportion of

(Level of Inclusion participants with gestation age a Outcome Effect measure evidence)

Comparison groups

measure [95% CI]

Systemic or RR 0.44 et al (146)

Narayanan Birth weight

Unsupplemented expressed

local infection [0.24, 0.82] RCT (LII)

<2500 g, at high

breastmilk during day and

risk of infection standard infant formula during from birth to night (n=32) compared with

hospital

standard infant formula only

discharge

(n=38)

Narayanan Birth weight

Systemic or RR 0.39 et al (147)

10 ml colostrum 3 times a

<2500 g, at high day until 72 hours of age along local infection [0.19, 0.81] RCT (LII)

risk of infection with standard infant formula from birth to (n=33) compared with

hospital

standard infant formula only

discharge

(n=33)

Lucas & Cole Birth weight

Necrotising Adjusted b (148 )

Unsupplemented expressed

enterocolitis OR 0.09 Cohort (LIII-2)

<1850 g

breast milk only (n=253)

compared with standard or

from birth to [0.03 to 0.33]

pre-term formula only hospital (n=236)

discharge

Formula plus breastmilk

Necrotising Adjusted b

(n=437) compared with

enterocolitis OR 0.29 standard or pre-term formula from birth to [0.12 to 0.67] only (n=236)

hospital discharge

Hylander et Pre-term infants 95%

Fortified expressed breast milk Systemic or Adjusted c al (149 )

None

local infection OR 0.43 Cohort (LIII-2) <1500g

with birth weight

along with pre-term formula

(n=123) compared with

from start of [0.23 to 0.81] pre-term formula only (n=89) enteral feeding to hospital discharge

Schanler et al 26–30 wk

Late onset RR 0.56 (150 )

Predominantly fed fortified

gestation, expressed breastmilk (n=62) sepsis or [0.36 to 0.89] Cohort (LIII-2) postnatal age

necrotising ≤96 hours

compared with pre-term

formula only (n=46)

enterocolitis

a If gestational age was not available in the publication, infants with birth weight <1500 g are assumed to be <32 wk gestation, those with 1501–2000

g to be 32–36 wk gestation, and those with 2001–2500 g to have a gestation of 37 weeks or more. b Adjusted for length of gestation, birth weight, sex, birth asphyxia, previous blood transfusions, use of theophylline and frusemide, polycythaemia, res-

piratory disease, duration of umbilical artery catheterization, age at first enteral feed, rate of progression of early feed volumes, and maternal steroid treatment.

c Adjusted for gestational age, 5-minute APGAR score, mechanical ventilation and days without enteral feedings.

28 OPTIMAL FEEDING OF LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS: TECHNICAL REVIEW

SUMMARY TABLE 2.1.2 Effects of mother’s own milk compared with formula feeding on neurodevelopment in LBW infants

Study, Design

Approximate proportion of

(Level of Inclusion participants with gestation age a Comparison Effect measure evidence)

Outcome measure

groups [95% CI]

Cognitive Adjusted b al (156)

Anderson et

3 studies, one

Breastfed (n=1254)

development difference in Meta-analysis weight <1850 g,

each with: birth

compared with formula-fed

scores mean scores of cohort

(n=751)

5.18 [3.59, studies (LIII-2) <2537 g

500–1500 g and

6.77] Rao et al (153 ) Term SGA infants 0

Total IQ score Adjusted c Cohort (LIII-2)

0 100%

Exclusively breastfed for

>12 wk (n=81) compared

on Wechler difference in with exclusively breastfed for Preschool and mean scores ≤12 wk (n=139)

Primary Scales 5.0 [0.7 to 9.3] of Intelligence

Bayley mental Adjusted d (159 )

Morley et al Term SGA infants 0

0 100%

Mother chose to breastfeed

development difference in Cohort (LIII-2)

(n=137) compared with

mother chose to formula

score at 18 mean scores

feed (n=235)

8.2 [5.0 to 11.4] Bayley

months age

Adjusted d psychomotor difference in development mean scores score at 18

5.8 [2.8 to 8.7] months age a If gestational age was not available in the publication, infants with birth weight <1500 g are assumed to be <32 wk gestation, those weighing 1501–2000 g to be 32–36 wk gestation, and those weighing 2001–2500 g to have a gestation of 37 weeks or more.

b Results included from studies that adjusted for at least 5 of the following variables: duration of breastfeeding, sex, maternal smoking history, mater- nal age, maternal intelligence, maternal education, maternal training, paternal education, race or ethnicity, socioeconomic status, family size, birth

order, birth weight, gestational age, and childhood experiences. c Adjusted for site of enrolment, maternal education, maternal IQ, maternal smoking, admission to a neonatal care unit, kindergarten attendance,

gender and asymmetric intrauterine growth retardation.

d Adjusted for child’s gender and birth order, maternal age, education score, social class, maternal head circumference, and height and whether mother smoked during pregnancy.

(2) DONOR HUMAN MILK

Effects on severe morbidity – infection

Results

A meta-analysis was located of all available RCTs till the year 2003, which examined the

The feeding options for LBW infants, par- impacts of donor human milk and formula

ticularly when breastfeeding is not possible, milk on rates of necrotising enterocolitis in

include donor milk and artificial infant for- pre-term infants <1850 g (Level I evidence)

mula. To make appropriate choices, it is impor- (148, 174–177). All four trials, conducted in

tant to consider the relative advantages and developed countries in the 1980s and early

disadvantages of these milks. The results of 1990s, compared infants who were fed unsup-

studies comparing the effect of donor human plemented drip donor milk with those fed

milk with that of artificial infant formula on standard or calorie-enriched formula; the

important outcomes are summarized below. milk feed comprised the infant’s sole diet for

at least 1 month during the initial phases of hospital admission.