After shoulder dystocia 195

After shoulder dystocia 195

lactic cesarean: a limited partnership. Clin Obstet Gynecol 43:326-334, critically ill patients: The University of Ottawa Critical Care Medicine, 2000

High-Fidelity Simulation, and Crisis Resource Management I Study. 49. Spellacy WN, Miller S, Winegar A, et al: Macrosomia: maternal char-

Crit Care Med 34:2167-2174, 2006

acteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol 66:158-161, 1985 60. Rosenthal ME, Adachi M, Ribaudo V, et al: Achieving housestaff com- 50. Combs CA, Singh NB, Khoury JC: Elective induction versus spontane-

petence in emergency airway management using scenario based simu- ous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia. Obstet Gy-

lation training: comparison of attending vs housestaff trainers. Chest necol 81:491-496, 1993

129:1453-1458, 2006

51. Gonen O, Rosen DJ, Dolfinn Z, et al: Induction of labor versus expect- 61. Strom P, Hedman L, Sarna L, et al: Early exposure to haptic feedback ant management in macrosomia: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol

enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective ran- 89:913-917, 1997

domized crossover study in surgical residents. Surg Endosc 20:1383- 52. Sanchez-Ramos L, Bernstein S, Kaunitz AM: Expectant management

versus labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic 62. Jude DC, Gilbert GG, Magrane D: Simulation training in the obstetrics review. Obstet Gynecol 100:997-1002, 2002

and gynecology clerkship. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1489-1492, 2006 53. Conway DL: Choosing route of delivery for the macrosomic infant of a

63. Gurewitsch E, Cha S, Johnson T, et al: Traction training for routine and diabetic mother: cesarean section versus vaginal delivery. J Matern Fetal

shoulder dystocia delivers: an experimental study. Am J Obstet Gy- Neonatal Med 12:442-448, 2002

necol 193:S41, 2005

54. Conway DL: Delivery of the macrosomic infant: cesarean section versus 64. Gonik B, Costello R, Zhang N, et al: Effect of clinician applied maneu- vers on fetal brachial plexus strain during shoulder dystocia delivery.

vaginal delivery. Semin Perinatol 26:225-231, 2002 Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(6 Suppl 1):S200, 2003 55. Allen R, Petersen S, Moore P, et al: Do antepartum and intrapartum risk

65. Reid DE: Conduct of normal labor and the puerperium, in Reid DE factors differ between mild and severe shoulder dystocia? Am J Obstet

(ed): Textbook of Obstetrics. Philadelphia, PA, W.B. Saunders Com- Gynecol 189:S208, 2003

pany, 1962, pp 448-489

56. Dyachenko A, Ciampi A, Fahey J, et al: Prediction of risk for shoulder 66. Freeth D, Ayida G, Berridge EJ, et al: MOSES: Multidisciplinary Ob- dystocia with neonatal injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1544-1549,

stetric Simulated Emergency Scenarios. J Interprof Care 20:552-554, 2006

57. Allen RH, Cha SL, Kranker LM, et al: Comparing mechanical fetal 67. Gurewitsch E, Stallings S, Tam W, et al: Does maneuver rate affect response during descent, crowning and restitution among deliveries

shoulder dystocia outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:S66, 2004 with and without shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007, in

68. Langer O, Berkus MD, Huff RW, et al: Shoulder dystocia: should the press

fetus weighing ⱖ4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section? Am J 58. Allen RH, Bankoski BR, Butzin CA, et al: Comparing clinician-applied

Obstet Gynecol 165:831-837, 1991

loads for routine, difficult and shoulder dystocia deliveries. Am J Obstet 69. Mollberg M, Hagberg H, Bager B, et al: High birthweight and shoulder Gynecol 171:1621-1627, 1994

dystocia: the strongest risk factors for obstetrical brachial plexus palsy 59. Kim J, Neilipovitz D, Cardinal P, et al: A pilot study using high-fidelity

in a Swedish population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84: simulation to formally evaluate performance in the resuscitation of

654-659, 2005