29
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
In this part, the writer will discuss about the methodology used in this research. This chapter consists of six parts. Those are description of research
method, research setting, research participants, research instrument and data gathering technique, data analysis technique and research procedure.
A. Research Method
Since the writer was analyzing Simple Present and Present Perfect errors of students’ writing, this research used document analysis as the research method.
Referring to Best 1959:117, document analysis which is also called content analysis is a kind of research method that deals with records or documents as the
research data. He also states that one of the purposes of document analysis is to analyze the types of errors in students’ work. Besides, Ary, Jacobs Razavieh
2002 state that document analy sis ‘focuses more on analyzing and interpreting
recorded materials within its own context’. This research method was conducted to get data on An Error Analysis of Simple Present Tense and Present Perfect Tense
Sentences of Students’ Writing in Critical Reading and Writing Course. Document analysis is one of the research methods that is included in qualitative research. Yin
2015 states that qualitative research deals more with words rather than with number and symbols.
30
B. Research Setting
This part presents where and when this research was conducted. The writer did the research in class D of Critical Reading and Writing of English Language
Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University. The researcher conducted the research from March until July 2016.
C. Research Instruments and Data Gathering Technique
Since this research was using qualitative research and the method was document analysis, there were two major instruments of this research. Besides, the
researcher also used table analysis to support the data findings. Those instruments can be noted as follows.
1. Human Instrument
Since this research was qualitative research and the method used was document analysis, the writer was the primary instrument to analyze the data. Ary,
Jacobs, Sorensen, and Walker 2 013:524 say that ‘the main instrument in
qualitative research is the human instrument’. The researcher became the main instrument of the research in which she gathered and analyzed the data of students’
writing. The writer focused on the errors sentences made by the students so that the writer could reveal what types of errors that were produced by the students in
dealing with their writing.
2. The Critical Reading and Writing students’ Mid Test 1 documents
The Critical Reading and Writing students’ Mid Test 1 document became
the main data of this research. The documents were from selected class of Critical PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
31 Reading and Writing which was class F. Through these documents, the writer
would be able to analyze the Simple Present and Present Perfect errors as presented in the documents.
3. Table of Analysis
There were some types of table used to analyze the students’ written work
of this research. The first table dealt with the total number of Simple Present and Present Perfect
Tense sentences of students ’ written work. The writer counted all Simple Present
and Present Perfect Tense sentences students wrote and made the total number in the form of table. This table was made to show and know the number of written
Simple Present and Present Perfect Tense sentences that would be analyzed by the writer. The total number of sentences in every document which contained Simple
Present and Present Perfect Tenses were presented in the table. Besides, the researcher also provided the percentage of the total sentences of Simple Present and
Present Perfect Tenses made by the students. The number and percentage of Simple Present and Present Perfect Tenses made by the students can be seen in the
following table.
Table 3.1 The Number of Simple Present and Present Perfect Tense Sentences
Doc No.
Simple Present Tense
Present Perfect Tense
Simple Present and Present Perfect
Tense Total
sentences Num
Num Num
Num
1. 2.
3. …
32
The second one, then, dealt with the number of errors in each type of errors that students wrote. The writer counted the number of errors in each types of errors
students wrote then put it into table. The writer also made the percentage of the number of error in the sentences students wrote. There are four types of errors
namely, omission, addition, misformation, and misordering. The table can be seen as follows.
Table 3.2 The Number of Errors According to the Types of Errors
Doc No.
Types of Errors Omission
Addition Misformation
Misordering
1. 2.
3. …
After obtaining the data through the tables above, then, the writer summarized the findings in two tables. The first table dealt with the number of types
of errors which occurred in Simple Present Tense. The second table showed the number of the types of errors which were found in Present Perfect Tense. The tables
can be seen as follows.
Table 3.3 The Number of Errors in Simple Present Tense
Simple Present Tense Types of Errors
Omission Addition
Misformation Misordering
33
Table 3.4 The Number of Errors in Present Perfect Tense
Perfect Present Tense Types of Errors
Omission Addition
Misformation Misordering
Then, there were two kinds of tables which covered all types of errors made by the students. The first table showed all the error sentences in Simple Present and
Present Perfect Tenses and the types of errors. The last table, furthermore, was to show the errors sentences students wrote both were Simple Present and Present
Perfect Tenses with the possible correction provided by the researcher. The tables can be seen as follows.
Table 3.5 Ungrammatical Simple Present and Present Perfect Tense Sentences According to the Types of Errors
Doc. No
Simple Present and Present Perfect Tense
Sentences Types of Errors of
Simple Present Types of Errors of
Present Perfect
O A
MF MO O
A MF MO
1. 2.
3. …
Table 3.6 Ungrammatical Simple Present and Present Perfect Tense Sentences and the Possible Correction
Doc. No
Original Sentences Possible Correction
1. 2.
3. …
34 Dealing with the two problems formulation, the writer used some techniques
to gather the data. The researcher collected the data by taking the documents of students’ Mid Test 1 assignments as the research data. The source data of the
research were taken from students of Critical Reading and Writing course.
D. Research Subjects