Perceptive Reading Selective Reading
15
Create Evaluate
Analyze Apply
Understand Remember
1987, pp. 1-2. Athanassiou, McNett and Harvey 2003 also state that Bloom’s
taxonomy is a six-classification system which is to observe student s’ behavior and
infer student s’ cognitive achievement. The classification consists of such
categories: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation Bloom, 1987. As time goes by, Anderson and Krathwohl 2001
made a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy in cognitive domain. To be more precise, the following graphs will
present the revision of Bloom’s taxonomy in cognitive domain. Churches 2008 states these classifications
present Bloom’s taxonomy in cognitive domain from the lowest level of thinking skills remembering to the
highest level of thinking skills creating.
The Original Bl oom’s Taxonomy The Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy
Figure 2.1 The Changes of Bloom’s Taxonomy in Cognitive Domain
These six levels of thinking skill are divided into two categories. The categories are
“lowest level of thinking skill” and “highest level of thinking skill” Anderson, 1990, p. 425. There are two levels which are considered as the lowest
Evaluation Synthesis
Analysis Application
Comprehension Knowledge
HIGH
LOW
16 levels of thinking skill. They are remembering, understanding and applying
Forehand, 2010. It is supported by Churches 2008 that students cannot understand the concept if they do not remember it first, similarly they cannot
apply if they do not remember information and understand concepts. It means that the basic level of thinking start from remembering, understanding then applying.
Moreover, there are three levels of thinking skill which are considered as the highest levels Forehand, 2010. They are analyzing, evaluating and creating
Forehand, 2010. Mayer and Wittrock 1966 note these levels are considered as the higher levels because they leads students to transfer information they have
before to solve new problems or new questions as cited in Anderson Krathwohl, 2001, p. 63. To be more precise, here is the explanation.