A single registry covering about 78 million people and operated by a federal bank

4. The si gle registr is part of Brazil’s de e tralizatio process and has resulted in more consistent pro-poor policies Cadastro Único has facilitated the development of in-depth knowledge about the poor population, greatly improving the ability of local and central governments to formulate and implement appropriate policies for the poor. From an operational aspect, Cadastro Único has considerably improved the consistency of social welfare policies: all programmes now use common targeting criteria and tools to select their beneficiaries and a common delivery mechanism for cash benefits. The use of the single registry has also contributed to the improvement of the transparency and traceability of information: all data are available online and, in the first quarter of 2013, 98 per cent of benefit payments were performed automatically through the payroll system. Benefit cancellation is also automatic and is regulated and controlled by the central Government. Finally, the implementation of Cadastro Único has empowered subnational authorities in the management and delivery of social protection programmes through providing them with concrete roles and responsibilities. In order to ensure the quality of the database, the programme includes incentives for municipalities to keep data updated. 5. What’s e t? The main challenge facing Cadastro Único remains the maintenance of such a large database on vulnerable populations. It is particularly complex since the single national Management Information System does not yet cover local-level registration and analysis needs. Hence, local-level managers often duplicate data, resulting in synchronization issues and data security problems, or deviate from the original purpose of the centrally defined processes to match their local needs. Connectivity and system availability are remaining challenges for the Cadastro Único. Even though an online solution is ideal, the stages of local government institutional and economic development are not homogeneous, making it complex to implement an online system and utilize the system on a daily basis. From a development perspective, the registry could be used as the reference registry for the whole social protection system including contributory schemes. Maintaining a larger database will be even more challenging, but should result in savings for the social protection system as a whole through resource pooling, increase the efficiency of identifying beneficiaries, and facilitate the implementation of social protection floors covering the whole population.

6. References

Assis, S.A.G.; Ferreira , J. . Usos, pote ialidades e limitações do Cadastro Único no subsídio às políticas sociais para a população de baixa renda, in J. Abrahão de Castro and L. Modesto eds.: Bolsa família 2003-2010: Avanços e desafiosorganizadores Brasília, IPEA. Barros, R.P.; Carvalho, M.; Mendonça , ‘.“.P. . “o e as utilidades do Cadast o Ú i o , i J. A ahão de Cast o a d L. Modesto eds.: Bolsa família 2003-2010: Avanços e desafiosorganizadores Brasília, IPEA. Barros, R.P. et al. 2008. A importância das cotas para a focalização do Programa Bolsa Família, Niterói: Faculdade de Economia, Universidade Federal Fluminense Texto para Discussão, No. 238. Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome do Brésil. 2005. Sistema Único de Assistência Social – SUAS. and Norma Operacional Básica NOBSUAS. Available at: www.mds.gov.brbolsafamiliacadastrounico. Cunha, R. 2009. T a sfe ia de e da o o di io alidade: A experiência do Programa Bolsa Famí lia , i Co epção e gestão da proteção social não contributiva no Brasil Brasília, Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome and UNESCO. Sátyro , N.; “OA‘E“, “. . Diag ósti o e dese pe ho e e te do P og a a Bolsa Fa ília , i B asil e dese ol i e to: Estado, planejamento e políticas públicas Brasília, IPEA. Soares, F.; Ribas, R.; Osório, R. 2007. Evaluating the Impact of B azil s Bolsa Fa ília: Cash T a sfe P og a es i Co pa ati e Perspective, IPC Evaluation Note, No. 1. Soares, S. 2012. Bolsa Família, Its Design, Its Impacts and Possibilities for the Future. IPC Working Paper, No. 89. Vieira , A. . “iste as de i fo ação e gestão do P og a a Bolsa Família e do Cadastro Único de Programas Sociais do Go e o Fede al , i Co epção e gestão da p oteção so ial ão contributiva no Brasil. Brasília, Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome and UNESCO.