Issues perceived by governments Issues perceived by development agencies and NGOs Concluding remarks

86

5.1 Issues perceived by farmers

The major sustainability issues perceived by farmers revolve around seasonality impacts on crop productivity of cottonii and the price instability that accompanied seasonal variations in seaweed supply. Specific issues are: • the need for robust cottonii cultivars that have similar growth characteristics to spinosum cultivars, especially with respect to growth during all seasons of the year; • the need for cottonii cultivar biomass in sufficient quantities for seasonal replanting; • the need for finance to cover the purchases of biomass for replanting; • means for prevention or control of “ice-ice” malaise, Neosiphonia infestation and other seasonal maladies; • access to fair trade and market links; • access to knowledge and information on technologies appropriate to the different seaweed farming regions.

5.2 Issues perceived by processors

Processors have been exposed for several years to cottonii supplies that fell short of demand. The problem became especially critical in 2008–09 when short supplies resulted in high and unstable prices that resulted in the loss of carrageenan market share to other food ingredients. As of late 2009, the carrageenan market remained weak. Processors were uncertain as to whether that was caused by price instability or was a reflection of the global economic recession. There was a general consensus that stable, affordable cottonii supplies were essential to sustainable carrageenan markets. Marinalg International is a worldwide association that promotes the image and use of seaweed-derived hydrocolloids in food, pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries. Many of the world’s largest processors of RAGS belong to Marinalg. Specific issues of interest to the industry have been addressed by Marinalg in position papers posted on its Web site www.marinalg.org. One persistent issue addressed by Marinalg deals with recent attempts to have carrageenan banned as a food additive Tobacman et al., 2008. Another problem is connected with reports describing how introduced RAGS have established alien and invasive populations in coral reef habitats in Hawaii Parsons et al., 2008, Kiribati Pala, 2008 and Tamil Nadu in India Tobacman et al., 2008; Chandrasekaran et al., 2008. Marinalg responded to these reports with a position paper and a protocol for introducing non-indigenous seaweeds.

5.3 Issues perceived by governments

The multilayered, decentralized structure of government agencies in Indonesia has led to integration and coordination concerns by officials in the several government agencies that deal with seaweed farmers. They are aware of the concerns of farmers and processors and also of the need to balance uses of the marine foreshore. Government officials have also complained about inadequate budgets and diffusion of funds through layers of government and agencies. As a result, information such as crop production statistics cannot be collected and disseminated comprehensively. Government organizations at the provincial and regency level have viewed seaweed farms and processing plants as sustainable development options for much of coastal Indonesia. Efforts are under way in many regions to develop financial support programmes for seaweed farmers. The training of human resources and the need for BDSs are perceived as necessary conditions for sustainable development.

5.4 Issues perceived by development agencies and NGOs

Numerous aid agencies, international financial institutions and NGOs have become involved directly or indirectly with seaweed farmers in Indonesia since the mid- 1980s. Generally, such agencies have worked either through government agencies or in coordination with them. The perceived needs of farmers and processors have been addressed with training and farmer finance initiatives tied to generally rigorous monitoring and evaluation efforts to ensure the proper use, disbursement and management of funds and the prompt submission of reports. Initiatives by IFC-PENSA, Swiss Contact, AusAID, CIDA and USAID have emphasized the development of BDS providers. Seaplant.net Foundation is one example of a BDS provider that has received support from all of those agencies.

5.5 Concluding remarks

Seaweed farming has been expanding in Indonesia since 1985; by 2008, it provided an average annual income on the order of USD5 000 to an estimated 20 000 farm households working on a part-time basis. The most diligent farmers were able to make 2–3 times that amount by working full time or by employing the “leader model” approach to farming. Such earnings were well above the poverty level. Interviewed farmers generally asserted that seaweed farming was by far their most lucrative economic activity. Seaweed farming is also complementary and compatible with other village economic activities such as fishing and farming land crops. Ready cash from seaweed farming has also had a noticeable multiplier effect. Shops, support services and local infrastructure have benefited visibly from seaweed cash flowing through local village economies. The spread of mobile communication technology, Internet connectivity and satellite television has been facilitated by the earnings from seaweed farming. Communication links, in turn, have facilitated the acquisition of knowledge, information, tools and solutions by seaweed farmers even in the more remote regions of Indonesia. The reflexive approach to Indonesian seaweed farm development has been driven by farmers and local traderscollectors in a “bottom-up” manner. A market need was revealed to them by value chain stakeholders on the “demand” side; farmers were exposed to the simple grow-out technologies; and with facilitation from a variety of organizations, seaweed farmers were able to build their businesses within the context of village norms, mores and structures. Seaweed farming has never been imposed on farmers using a “top-down” approach; in addition, the simplicity of farming techniques has meant that technology transfer has been readily accomplished. Seaweed farming has rapidly become integrated into the social fabric of farmer villages to the point where it now appears to be a traditional economic activity even though it did not exist until the mid-1980s or later. Opportunities for seaweed aquaculture intensification and integrated multitrophic aquaculture are considerable. 88 References Chandrasekaran, S., Nagendran, N.A., Pandiaraja, D., Krishnankutty, N. Kamalakannan, B. 2008. Bioinvasion of Kappaphycus alvarezii on corals in the Gulf of Mannar, India. Current Science, 949: 1167–1172 also available at www.ias.ac.incurrsci may1020081167.pdf. Gan, K.T. 2003. Strategic alliances in the tropical Asian seaweed industry: implications for development in Asia. Adelaide, University of South Australia. 89 pp. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J. Sturgeon, T. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 121: 78–104 also available at www.global- production.comscoreboardresourcessturgeon_2005_governance-of-value-chains.pdf. Hurtado, A.Q., Agbayani, R.F., Sanares, R. de Castro-Mallare, M.T. 2001. The seasonality and economic feasibility of cultivating Kappaphycus alvarezii in Panagatan Cays, Caluya, Antique, Philippines. Aquaculture, 199: 295–310. JLJ Group. 2006. Preliminary study – Chinese market for seaweed and carrageenan industry. Shanghai, China. Maarif, S. Jompa, J. 2007. The Coral Triangle and coastal community development through sustainable integrated aquaculture. Sustainable Integrated Mariculture Meeting and Workshop. Makassar, Indonesia, Seaplant.net. also available at http:seaplant.net index_mbr.php?page=sea_publications. McHugh, D.J. 2003. A guide to the seaweed industry. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 441. Rome, FAO. 105 pp. also available at ftp:ftp.fao.orgdocrepfao006y4765e y4765e00.pdf. Neish, I.C. 2008a. Tropical red seaweeds as a foundation for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture IMTA: four propositions and an action plan for this major opportunity in the Coral Triangle. Seaplant.net Monograph no. HB2E 1008 V1 IMTA. Makassar, Indonesia. also available at http:seaplant.netbimpeagapage_12.php. Neish, I.C. 2008b. Basic manufacturing practices for raw-dried seaweed and semi-refined carrageenan from Eucheuma and Kappaphycus. Seaplant.net Monograph no. HB2G 1008 V2 BMP. Makassar, Indonesia. also available at http:seaplant.netbimpeagapage_10. php. Neish, I.C. 2008c. A ten-step functional framework for building ventures and alliances among seaplant enterprises. Seaplant.net Monograph no. HB2C 0808 V1 VA. Makassar, Indonesia. also available at http:seaplant.netbimpeagapage_12.php. Neish, I.C. 2009. An analysis of world production and trade in tropical red seaweeds; with focus on the Philippines and Indonesia. Makassar, Indonesia, Seaplant.net. Neish, I.C. Julianto, B.S. 2008. A practical guide to quality assurance, governance systems and good practices for tropical seaweed-to-carrageenan value chains: with focus on developing harmonization and transparency in the BIMP-EAGA region of ASEAN in the Coral Triangle. Seaplant.net Monograph no. HB2D 1108 V1 GTZ. Makassar, Indonesia. also available at http:seaplant.netbimpeagadownload_gtz.php. Neish, I.C., Hurtado, A.Q., Julianto, B. Saragih, D. 2009. Good aquaculture practices for Kappaphycus and Eucheuma. A compilation of nine training modules for seaweed farmers. Seaplant.net Monograph no. HB2F 0909 V4 GAP. Makassar, Indonesia. Parsons, M.L., Walsh, W.J., Settlemier, C.J., White, D.J., Ballauer, J.M., Ayotte, P.M., Osada, K.M. Carman, B. 2008. A multivariate assessment of the coral ecosystem health of two embayments on the lee of the island of Hawai‘i. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 566: 1138–1149. Scoones, I. 1998. Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper no. 72. Brighton, UK, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex. 22 pp. also available at www.ids.ac.ukfilesWp72.pdf. Scoones, I., Leach, M., Smith, A., Stagl, S., Stirling, A. Thompson, J. 2007. Dynamic systems and the challenge of sustainability. STEPS Working Paper 1. Brighton, UK, STEPS Centre. 68 pp. also available at www.stepscentre.orgPDFsfinal_steps_dynamics. Sulu, R., Kumar, L., Hay, C. Pickering, T. 2004. Kappaphycus seaweed in the Pacific: review of introductions and field testing proposed quarantine protocols. Noumea, Secretariat of the Pacific Community. 85 pp. also available at wwwx.spc.intcoastfish sectionsreefLibraryReportsSulu_04.pdf. Tobacman, J.K., Bhattacharyya, S., Borthakur, A. Dudeja, P.K. 2008. The carrageenan diet: not recommended. Science, 3215892: 1040–1041. The Nature Conservancy TNC. 2004. Delineating the Coral Triangle, its ecoregions and functional seascapes: report on an expert workshop, held at the Southeast Asia Center for Marine Protected Areas, Bali, Indonesia April 30 May 2, 2003. Bali, Indonesia, The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Asia Center for Marine Protected Areas. 26 pp. also available at www.southchinasea.orgdocsNature20Conservancy-Coral20Triangle. pdf. Social and economic dimensions of carrageenan seaweed farming in the Philippines Anicia Q. Hurtado Chair Integrated Services for the Development of Aquaculture and Fisheries McArthur Highway, Tabuc Suba, Jaro 5000 Iloilo City, Philippines Hurtado, A.Q. 2013. Social and economic dimensions of carrageenan seaweed farming in the Philippines. In D. Valderrama, J. Cai, N. Hishamunda N. Ridler, eds. Social and economic dimensions of carrageenan seaweed farming, pp. 91–113. Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 580. Rome, FAO. 204 pp. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study would not have been completed without the warm support of several people in the industry who shared their time, effort and information. I am truly grateful to the seaweed farmers I interviewed in Marupo and Marcilla, Coron Palawan; Guindacpan Island, Tubigon, Bohol; Panyam Look, Layag-Layag and Arena Blanco, Zamboanga City; Pondohan Sipangkot, Sapagamat 1 2, Baligtang Sitangkai, Tawi-Tawi. I thank Ms Jacqueline Corrosco, Hadji Adam Omar, Hadja Saada Omar, Munib Joe, Arnel Kalugdan, Richard Radier, Benson Dakay, Antonio Yuri Yap, Farley Baricuatro, Dinah Sayam, Philip Parado, José Arturo Evalle, and Dr Jumelita Romero for invaluable information given. 92

1. INTRODUCTION