Result of Post-test THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GUIDED WRITING FOR TEACHING WRITING RECOUNT TEXT (A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP N 1 Tulis in the Academic Year of 2014 2015)

 The teacher asks the students to answer questions based on the text.  Teacher and students discuss the answers together.  The students complete the outline with their activity in the past.  The students write a recount text based on the outline they make.  The teacher checks the students‟ writing. Closing  The teacher asks the students whether they find any difficulties during the lesson.  The teacher concludes the lesson.  The teacher greets the students to close the lesson.  The teacher asks the students whether they find any difficulties during the lesson.  The teacher concludes the lesson.  The teacher tells that they will have a post-test for the next meeting.  The teacher greets the students to close the lesson.

4.5 Result of Post-test

Post-test was given after conducting all the activities above. The test was given to measure the students‟ ability after getting the treatments. The test item was the same as the pre-test. It was conducted on Sunday, 25 of May 2015. Then the result was analyzed. The result of post-test in experimental group can be seen in the table below: Table 4.10 Post-Test Scores of Experimental Group Number Students’ Code Post-Test Scores 1 F-01 65 2 F-02 75 3 F-03 - 4 F-04 88 5 F-05 71 6 F-06 83 7 F-07 52 8 F-08 96 9 F-09 78 10 F-10 63 11 F-11 74 12 F-12 95 13 F-13 96 14 F-14 87 15 F-15 77 16 F-16 76 17 F-17 80 18 F-18 56 19 F-19 - 20 F-20 69 21 F-21 94 22 F-22 91 23 F-23 54 24 F-24 70 25 F-25 97 26 F-26 88 27 F-27 95 28 F-28 85 29 F-29 89 30 F-30 95 31 F-31 88 32 F-32 83 33 F-33 86 34 F-34 97 35 F-35 98 36 F-36 - 37 F-37 96 38 F-38 88 39 F-39 60 40 F-40 97 41 F-41 74 The calculation from the post-test of experimental group is shown by the table below. Table 4.11 Calculation from Table 4.10 Score f a fX b X - ̅ X - ̅ 2 d fX - ̅ 2 e 98 1 98 16.11 259.53 259.53 97 3 291 15.11 228.31 684.94 96 3 288 14.11 199.09 597.28 95 3 285 13.11 171.87 515.62 94 1 94 12.11 146.65 146.65 91 1 91 9.11 82.99 82.99 89 4 356 7.11 50.55 202.21 88 1 88 6.11 37.33 37.33 87 1 87 5.11 26.11 26.11 86 1 86 4.11 16.89 16.89 85 2 170 3.11 9.67 19.34 83 1 83 1.11 1.23 1.23 80 1 80 -1.89 3.57 3.57 78 1 78 -3.89 15.13 15.13 77 1 77 -4.89 23.91 23.91 76 1 76 -5.89 34.69 34.69 75 2 150 -6.89 47.47 94.94 74 1 74 -7.89 62.25 62.25 71 1 71 -10.89 118.59 118.59 70 1 70 -11.89 141.37 141.37 69 1 69 -12.89 166.15 166.15 65 1 65 -16.89 285.27 285.27 63 1 63 -18.89 356.83 356.83 60 1 60 -21.89 479.17 479.17 56 1 56 -25.89 670.29 670.29 54 1 54 -27.89 777.85 777.85 52 1 52 -29.89 893.41 893.41 Total 38 3112 6713.58 Furthermore, the result of post-test in control group can be seen in the table below: Table 4.12 Post-Test Scores of Control Group Number Students’ Code Post-Test Scores 1 D-01 76 2 D-02 78 3 D-03 87 4 D-04 41 5 D-05 54 6 D-06 80 7 D-07 53 8 D-08 75 9 D-09 88 10 D-10 80 11 D-11 83 12 D-12 83 13 D-13 50 14 D-14 83 15 D-15 87 16 D-16 84 17 D-17 76 18 D-18 81 19 D-19 80 20 D-20 39 21 D-21 77 22 D-22 80 23 D-23 80 24 D-24 83 25 D-25 80 26 D-26 80 27 D-27 80 28 D-28 84 29 D-29 49 30 D-30 36 31 D-31 74 32 D-32 35 33 D-33 77 34 D-34 91 35 D-35 84 36 D-36 77 37 D-37 80 38 D-38 89 39 D-39 80 40 D-40 79 41 D-41 91 The calculation from the post-test of control group is shown by the table below: Table 4.13 Calculation from Table 4.12 Score f a fX b X - ̅ X - ̅ 2 d fX - ̅ 2 e 91 2 182 16.76 280.90 561.80 89 1 89 14.76 217.86 217.86 88 1 88 13.76 189.34 189.34 87 2 174 12.76 162.82 325.64 84 3 252 9.76 95.26 285.77 83 4 332 8.76 76.74 306.95 81 1 81 6.76 45.70 45.70 80 10 800 5.76 33.18 331.78 79 1 79 4.76 22.66 22.66 78 1 78 3.76 14.14 14.14 77 3 231 2.76 7.62 22.85 76 2 152 1.76 3.10 6.20 75 1 75 0.76 0.58 0.58 74 1 74 -0.24 0.06 0.06 54 1 54 -20.24 409.66 409.66 53 1 53 -21.24 451.14 451.14 50 1 50 -24.24 587.58 587.58 49 1 49 -25.24 637.06 637.06 41 1 41 -33.24 1104.90 1104.90 39 1 39 -35.24 1241.86 1241.86 36 1 36 -38.24 1462.30 1462.30 35 1 35 -39.24 1539.78 1539.78 Total 41 3044 9765.56 From the tables above, I calculated the mean score and standard deviation of post-test in experimental group are as follows. ̅ 1 = = = 81.89 SD 1 = √ ̅ = √ = √ = 13.29 Moreover, the mean score and standard deviation in control group are as follows. ̅ 2 = = = 74.24 SD 2 = √ ̅ = √ = √ = 15.43 Based on the post-test result, the total score of experimental group was 3112. This group got mean score 81.89. Furthermore, the control group got total score 3044. The mean score of this group was also increased, it was 74.24. As a result, the result shows that there was an improvement in post test result than pre-test. Based on the tables above, it meant the students` improvement of experimental group is higher than control group. Based on the post-test result, it can be concluded that guided writing technique is more effective in teaching writing recount text.

4.6 Mean Scores Differences between Pre-Test and Post-Test of

Dokumen yang terkait

The effectiveness of guided questions in teaching students’ narrative writing: an experimental study at the eighth grade students of MTs Pembangunan UIN Jakarta

0 4 101

The Effectiveness Of Using English Comics Strips In Teaching Writing Of Narrative Text; A Quasi-Experimental Research at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Islam Al-Ikhlas in the Academic Year 2013/2014.

1 7 117

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS FOR TEACHING VOCABULARY OF RECOUNT TEXT Quasi Experimental Study at the Eighth Graders of SMP N 6 Semarang in the Academic Year 2015 2016

2 13 120

The Effectiveness of Using Photograph Towards Students' Skill in Writing Recount Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eighth Year Students of Nusantara Plus Junior High School)

0 10 121

The Effectiveness of Diary Writing on Students' Writing of Recount Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eighth Grade of SMPN 166 Jakarta in the Academic Year 2015/2016)

0 13 112

The Effectiveness of Guided Question Technique on Students' Writing Skill of Recount Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of MTs. Negeri 13 Jakarta)

0 3 129

STUDENTS’ DIFFICULTIES IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT AT THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMP MURNI 1 SURAKARTA IN 2014/2015 Students’ Difficulties In Writing Recount Text At The Eighth Grade Of Smp Murni 1 Surakarta In 2014/2015 Academic Year.

0 6 17

STUDENTS’ DIFFICULTIES IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT AT THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMP MURNI 1 SURAKARTA Students’ Difficulties In Writing Recount Text At The Eighth Grade Of Smp Murni 1 Surakarta In 2014/2015 Academic Year.

0 3 11

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIARY WRITING AS THE TECHNIQUE FOR TEACHING WRITING RECOUNT TEXT (An Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade of SMP Negeri 2 Purbalingga in Academic Year 20152016)

1 0 14

2. The Importance of Writing - THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIARY WRITING AS THE TECHNIQUE FOR TEACHING WRITING RECOUNT TEXT (An Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade of SMP Negeri 2 Purbalingga in Academic Year 2015/2016) - repository perpustakaan

0 0 15