Yalden’s Instructional Design Model

Besides referring to Kemp’s instructional model, this study also uses Yalden’s instructional model as the reference to create the writer’s instructional model. Yalden’s model is used as the reference since Yalden’s model is based on the needs survey. In other words, the needs survey is used as the basis to move to the next step as shown in Figure 2.2. Furthermore, how well the designer analyzes the needs survey may be a determining factor in designing the instructional materials.

b. Yalden’s Instructional Design Model

According to Yalden 1987, the development of syllabus design should involve a number of extra-linguistic factors, the educational setting in which the course is to be taught, the learners’ characteristics, the circumstances in which the educational institution operates, even the society in which the language-learning and teaching process is to be carried on. Therefore, the consideration of those factors refers to communicative syllabus. In order to implement the communicative syllabus in a language program development, Yalden proposes these following steps: 1 Needs Survey What should be done in a needs survey is related to the information gathering which is needed in designing a language program development. When the information gathering is successfully completed, the realistic and acceptable objectives can also be formulated successfully. Therefore, the needs survey include the identification of the communication requirements, personal needs, motivations, relevant characteristics and resources of the learners. 2 Description of Purpose After completing the needs survey, the next step is description of purpose. This is used to clarify the purpose of the language program. The designer should decide whether the program is for specific purposes or academic purposes based on the needs survey. Then, the objectives and the methodology of a language-teaching program are selected as the basis for conducting the next step. 3 Selection or Development of Syllabus Type In this step, the designer can combine the various types of syllabus and put various focuses on oral or written language as it is required. Therefore, Yalden 1987 suggests the communicative syllabus, namely structural-functional syllabus, structures and functions syllabus, variable focus syllabus, functional focus syllabus, fully notional syllabus, and fully communicative syllabus. 4 Production of a Proto-Syllabus After selecting the syllabus type, the next step is to describe what content that the syllabus will have. The content may include the communicative functions, discourse skills, and study skills. 5 Production of a Pedagogical Syllabus In this step, what should be done by the designer is to develop of teaching, learning, and testing approaches. It includes the development of teaching materials and development of testing sequence and decisions on testing instruments. 6 Development and Implementation of Classroom Procedures There are three things that should be done in this step, namely selecting the exercise types and teaching techniques, preparing the lesson plans, and preparing the weekly schedules. After completing those three things, the following step is implementation in the classroom. 7 Evaluation The evaluation of Yalden’s instructional model consists of evaluating the students, the materials, and the teaching approaches. This step is also labeled ‘the recycling step’ because the designer can start again from the beginning. In this study, the writer refers to Yalden’s and Kemp’s instructional model to create the writer’s instructional model. However, the writer does not use all of the steps of Kemp’s and Yalden’s instructional model. The steps which are used from Kemp’s instructional model are determining goals and specific purposes, and evaluation. Meanwhile, the step which is used from Yalden’s model is needs survey. In addition, the writer uses those steps since it has fitted to the writer’s needs in designing reading instructional materials using CBI for the tenth grade students of Selection of Syllabus Description of purpose Needs Survey Production of Proto- Syllabus Production of Pedagogical Syllabus Development and Implementati on Evaluation Figure 2.2: Yalden’s Instructional Model Yalden, 1987:88 SMA BOPKRI I Yogyakarta. Thus, the detail explanation will be presented in Theoretical Framework.

2. School-Based Curriculum KTSP

Dokumen yang terkait

Designing a set of reading comprehension materials based on nine high-yield instructional strategies for tenth grade students of SMA Negeri 11 Yogyakarta.

0 2 2

Designing a set of integrated reading writing materials using task-based learning for the eighth grade students of SMP BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta.

0 0 132

Designing a set of English instructional writing materials using taks-based language learning for the tenth grade students of SMA Santa Maria Yogyakarta.

0 0 131

The instructional reading materials using content-based instruction for the tenth grade students of Tarakanita Magelang Senior High School.

0 1 199

Designing a set of supplementary integrated reading writing materials using task-based learning for the tenth grade students of SMA Bopkri 2 Yogyakarta.

0 0 171

Designing a set of English instructional listening materials using communicative language teaching for the tenth grade students of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta.

0 1 199

English instructional reading materials using interactive models for the tenth grade students of SMK BOPKRI 1 Yogyakarta.

0 0 192

Designing a set of supplementary instructional listening materials incorporating content-based instruction and cooperative learning for the eleventh grade students of SMA 9 Yogyakarta.

0 2 270

Designing a set of supplementary integrated reading writing materials using task based learning for the tenth grade students of SMA Bopkri 2 Yogyakarta

0 4 169

Designing a set of reading instructional materials using content based instruction for the tenth grade students of SMA BOPKRI 1 Yogyakarta

0 0 200