36 responses. It was also a recorded interview. To help the researcher conducting the
interview, a lecture r’s interview blueprint was made as shown in Table 3.3.
Table 3.3 Lectu rer’s Interview Blueprint
Type of Questions Features
Theory Item
Numbers
Open-ended Questions and
Personal Interview
Classes of Book Report Course in academic year
20122013
Extensive Reading Krashen, 1985;
Bamford Day, 2004; Urquhart
Weir, 1998; Hedge, 2000; and Lado,
1964.
1 Reasons of designing Book
Report Course for the first semester students
2 Teaching learning
activities in Book Report Course
3 Problems faced by the
students Reading Problems
Raygor Raygor, 1985; Kustaryo, 1988;
Erfort, 2013 4
2. Data Gathering Technique
There were two ways of gathering the data of the study. The first technique in gathering the data of the study was distributing the questionnaires.
The researcher distributed the questionnaires directly to the students of Book Report Course. The data gained from the questionnaires aimed to find out the
reading problems faced by the students in the course and the students’ perception
on Book Report Course. The participants filled in the questionnaires in the classes. Obtaining the data from the questionnaires, the researcher conducted the
interview with the students in order to deeply obtain the perception of the students on reading habit formation in Book Report Course. Related to the study, the
researcher used the personal interviews. Using the type of interviews, the researcher had opportunity to observe the respondents and asked for detailed
37 information of the problems. In conducting the interviews, the researcher recorded
the respondent s’ answers. The researcher also interviewed a lecturer of Book
Report Course. The aim of interviewing the lecturer was to obtain information of Book Report Course and its class activities.
E. Data Analysis Technique
The data gained from techniques previously discussed were expected to answer the questions of research problems. The data from the questionnaires were
put in a table which consists of columns for statements and columns for the students’ answers of degree of agreements strongly agree, agree, disagree, and
strongly disagree. Since the study employed a qualitative research, thus some numeric data may be collected Ary et al. 2006: p. 425. The researcher made a
table of data analysis technique that results numeric data from the questionnaires.
Table 3.4 Data Analysis Technique
No. Statement
Degree of Agreement SA
A D
SD 1.
2. Etc.
Total
The numeric data of the students’ answers in the questionnaire were formulated into percentage. The formula was as follows:
x 100 Notes:
= the number of students based on degree of agreement
