The Comprehension Reading Skill Data

B. Data Analysis and Testing Hyphotheses

1. Data Analysis

Before the data is analyzed, the linearity and normality distribution of the data sets the two variables critical thinking ability and comprehension reading ability are firstly tested. The linearity test is important to know whether the data is linear or not; while, the normality distribution is tested to know the data normality. Furthermore, the linearity and normality tests are crucial to decide whether parameter statistic or non-parameter statistic used in this study. In this study, the parameter statistic is used to calculate the data. Therefore, as the requirement in the parameter statistic in correlation research, the linearity and normality of the data has to be examined first. The explanation of test of linearity and normality distribution are presented as follow:

a. Analysis of Linearity

The linearity of critical thinking ability and comprehension reading ability data are analyzed using SPSS software. The result of the analysis is represented in the table below: Table 4.3 Table ANOVA Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Comprehension Reading Betwee Groups Combined 783,054 14 55,932 2,581 ,026 Linearity 398,963 1 398,963 18,413 ,000 Skill Critical Thinking Skill Deviation from Linearity 384,091 13 29,545 1,364 ,259 Within Groups 433,346 20 21,667 Total 1216,40 34 Table 4.3 above reveals the linearity distribution of the data of both critical thinking and comprehension reading ability. It results that the linearity data is in the significant of 0.00. It is lower than the level of significance 0.00 0.05. Because the linearity value is lower than the level of significance, it means that both of the data have linear distribution; therefore, parameter statistic is used in this study.

b. Analysis of Normality

The normality test was conducted using SPSS software. The normality test is conducted in order to know whether the populations from which the samples are taken are normally distributed or not. It is important because normal data is an underlying assumption in parametric testing. The result of normality test is presented in the table 4.4. From the table 4.4 below, shows that the Kolmogorov- Smirnov normality test results are .200 for variable Y and .200 for variable X. Meanwhile, the normality test using Shapiro-Wilk is .765 for variable Y and .351 for variable X. Table 4.4 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic Df Sig. Critical Thinking Skill ,099 35 ,200 ,966 35 ,351 Comprehension Reading Skill ,083 35 ,200 ,980 35 ,765 . This is a lower bound of the true significance. a. Lilliefors Significance Correction From the results described above, it can be concluded that the data of both critical thinking ability and comprehension reading skill of the eleventh grade students of SMA Kharisma Bangsa are normally distributed. It can be seen from the significant results from both Kolmogorov- Simonov and Shapiro-Wilk which are higher than 0.05 .200 0.05, .765 0.005, .351 0.05.

c. Pearson Product Moment Correlation Test

Due to the fact that both of the data critical thinking ability and comprehension reading ability tends to be linear and normally distributed, the parametric statistic that is used in this study is Pearson Product Moment. It is used to find out the correlation coefficient between two variables. The final score of variables X and Y are presented in the following table: Table 4.5 The Final Score of Critical Thinking Ability and Comprehension Reading Ability No. Participants X Y X2 Y2 XY 1. 1 65 77 4225 5929 5005 2. 2 67,5 75 4556,25 5625 5062,5 3. 3 70 73,5 4900 5402,25 5145 4. 4 77,5 77,5 6006,25 6006,25 6006,25 5. 5 80 81 6400 6561 6480 6. 6 82,5 81,5 6806,25 6642,25 6723,75 7. 7 82,5 70,5 6806,25 4970,25 5816,25 8. 8 70 75 4900 5625 5250 9. 9 85 83,5 7225 6972,25 7097,5 10. 10 65 72,5 4225 5256,25 4712,5 11. 11 72,5 75,5 5256,25 5700,25 5473,75 12. 12 82,5 83 6806,25 6889 6847,5 13. 13 77,5 68 6006,25 4624 5270 14. 14 70 81,5 4900 6642,25 5705 15. 15 85 83 7225 6889 7055 16. 16 62,5 73,5 3906,25 5402,25 4593,75 No. Participants X Y X2 Y2 XY