¾ Conclusion: According to the result of the test above t
o
is 12. 475, t
t
5 is 2.05, and t
t
t
o
t
t
means there is significant difference, Ha is accepted, and
B. of The Data
In conducting the data observation, the writer uses observation ves; the student activity, the technique is applied, the
2.
In completing the data, the writer takes interviews with several English teacher of MTs Pembangunan UIN Syarif
3. Ladders Game in
eaching Simple Past Tense
t eight grade, C class of MTs Pembangunan 1 is 2.76.
Ho is rejected. It means, there are many students’ developments in classroom action research of learning simple past tense by using grammatical snakes and
ladders game.
Interpretation
1. Data of Observation
form. The writer obser visual aid is used, the student development in understanding simple past
tense, and their fun learning in classroom action research. From the observation data, many students enjoy classroom action research by using
grammatical snakes and ladder game, and there are many students’ development in learning simple past tense.
Data of Interview
students and the Hidayatullah Jakarta. From the interview, the writer gets good response
from the student also the collaborator teacher about action research in learning simple past tense by grammatical snakes and ladders game. There
are many suggestions for the writer to make more creative game for developing student understanding in English learning.
The Implementation of Grammatical Snakes and T
The implementation of classroom action research of Grammatical Snakes and Ladders Game a
UIN Syarif Hidatyatullah Jakarta is difficult. The struggle must be prepared before action. In this action research, the writer has to prepare
everything; lesson plan, student worksheet, visual aids, the observation form, interview sheet, questionnaire, and test paper. In addition, the most
important is writer’s smart teaching, because without writer spirit and smart in teaching the class won’t run well. Beside, The class management
is hard, the writer has to manage the class before starting the class action research and she has to handle the trouble maker students who always
disturb the class situation in teaching learning process.
tudents’ Responses 4. S
The writer gets students’ responses from interview and n action research. Almost students like to do this
mat
5.
In suggesting class action research data, the writer gets the student nd post test”. These tests are about simple past
ssroom action research of learning simple past tense by questionnaire data of a
gram ical snakes and ladders game in learning simple past tense. They
agree “ this game is used by another teacher in teaching learning process”. They said that they enjoy the game and they have many developments in
understanding simple past tense.
Students’ Achievements
score by giving “pre- test a tense. The writers compares between pre- test and post- test by using test “t” .
The result are; t
o
is 12. 475
,
t
t
5 is 2.05, and t
t
1 is 2.76, t
o
t
t
, Ha is accepted, Ho is rejected. It means there is significant difference between pre-
test and post- test, According to the data above that there are many students’
developments in cla using grammatical snakes and ladders game.
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion
Based on the description and interpretation data in this action action research of grammatical snakes and ladders game is a
eaching, material research, this
good way for teacher professional and student development in learning and understanding simple past tense. In this action research, there are two
terms have to be considered; the quantity and quality. In quantity the writer can see from the test result, there is or not the developments of
student simple past tense understanding can be gotten from the score are accepted. In quality, the writer can see the process of teaching learning
process by identifying the student problem in English learning, grading material from simple to complex before acting, making fun teaching
technique, managing class good situation, understanding the student in learning and many others things can develop teachers professional in
teaching and develop student understanding in subject. In addition, the writer can get lessons about good teaching. Good
teaching is good teacher and good student. In t preparation is not enough, the teacher spirit and cheerful is very important
and also these give the big influence in successful of teaching learning
62
