61
CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
In this chapter, I would like to present the analysis results and discussion. The first section is the analysis results. This section is presented to describe the
quantitative data, to verify the hipotheses proposed in Chapter II and to describe the students’ responses towards FLAP. The second section of this chapter is the
discussion. This section is presented to discuss the analysis results.
A. ANALYSIS RESULTS
As mentioned previously, there are three research questions addressed in this study: 1 Is there an effect of FLAP on the listening comprehension of grade X
students?, 2 Is there an interaction effect of FLAP and listening strategy on the listening comprehension?, and 3 What is learning using FLAP like?
The first and the second research questions will be answered using quantitative data,
meanwhile the last research question will be answered by using the qualitative data obtained from the research. Therefore, to make the findings clear, the
quantitative and the qualitative data, as well as its statistical processes are presented here.
1. Quantitative Data Experimental Method
The quantitative data are important in experimental method. Quantitative data in this research are the data obtained from the listening comprehension test
and the listening strategy questionnaire. These data were processed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Descriptive statistic is used to describe the
data in order to be understood better while inferential statistics was conducted to test the hypothesis. At first, the data will be presented in the forms of descriptive
statistics and then followed by the inferential statistics.
a. Data from Listening Comprehension Tests 1 The Pre-test Result
The data obtained from the pre-test given to control class Appendix 10 shows that the minimum score is 40 and the maximum score is 80. Moreover, the
mean value is 62.2, the mode is 70, the median is 65, and the standard deviation is 9.8. The results of the data analysis presented in the table of descriptive analysis
as shown below.
Table 4.1 Descriptive Analysis of the Pre-Test Score on Listening Comprehension of the Control Class
N Minimum
Maximum Mean
Mode Median
Std. Deviation 30
40.00 80.00
62.1667 70.00
65.0000 9.79825
In addition to the table above, the pre-test data from the control class are presented on the score criteria to describe the students listening comprehension
before the research is conducted. There are five categories to classify the scores such as very good, fair, poor and very poor.
Table 4.2Frequency Distribution of the Pre-Test Scores on Listening Comprehension of the Control Class
No. Score
Frequency Category
Absolute Relative
Percentage Cumulative
Percentage
1 88-100
Very Good 2
76-87 1
3 3
Good 3
64-75 15
50 53
Fair 4
52-63 9
30 83
Poor 5
0-51 5
17 100
Very Poor Total
30 100
Kategori