Hypothesis testing Inferential Statistics

proven by the statistical test of normality and the same approach or activities during the teaching-learning process. Meanwhile, for the qualitative survey design, four respondents were selected as representative of the class to reveal their responses on the use of FLAP in learning listening. During the interview, they were asked to tell their experience and feelings toward FLAP freely without the intervention from the interviewer. The validity was also obtained from the instrumentation. The instruments are important since they are the tools for collecting data. If the instruments are not valid, then the research results are questionable. All of the instruments test, questionnaire, interview guideline in this research has fulfilled the validity. The listening comprehension test as well as the listening strategy questionnaire were validated conceptually and empirically. They were based on the theory and consulted to the lecturer and the teacher who are competent in the topic. In addition to that, they were also validated by using trusted statistical program such as ITEMAN and SPSS 17. Meanwhile, the interview guideline was also validated conceptually by referring to the pre-figured themes and consulting to the lecturer before it was used. Furthermore, in this research, the moderator valiable is used, that is listening strategy. This was done to strengthen the external validity. In other words, by having a moderator variable listening strategy, it is very likely that the research results can be more generalizable than if it was done without examining the moderator variable. Lastly, the efforts to establish the validity of the research result were done by conducting the research procedure systematically. 61

CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

In this chapter, I would like to present the analysis results and discussion. The first section is the analysis results. This section is presented to describe the quantitative data, to verify the hipotheses proposed in Chapter II and to describe the students’ responses towards FLAP. The second section of this chapter is the discussion. This section is presented to discuss the analysis results.

A. ANALYSIS RESULTS

As mentioned previously, there are three research questions addressed in this study: 1 Is there an effect of FLAP on the listening comprehension of grade X students?, 2 Is there an interaction effect of FLAP and listening strategy on the listening comprehension?, and 3 What is learning using FLAP like? The first and the second research questions will be answered using quantitative data, meanwhile the last research question will be answered by using the qualitative data obtained from the research. Therefore, to make the findings clear, the quantitative and the qualitative data, as well as its statistical processes are presented here.

1. Quantitative Data Experimental Method

The quantitative data are important in experimental method. Quantitative data in this research are the data obtained from the listening comprehension test and the listening strategy questionnaire. These data were processed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Descriptive statistic is used to describe the