Gestures in mediating to explain the expectation of

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id some work during the learning activity and then watch to see that it is actually accomplished. He then added that teachers have to closely monitor selected individuals until it is clear that the directions are understood and being applied. If the class or an individual student is having a problem, teachers need to point out a positive example as an alternative to the problem. Sime further suggested that teachers need to employ non-verbal cues in monitoring the class. 100 Student teacher A walked around the class to check the pair work of making short dialogue about a memo. She said ‘good’ while extending her right hand index finger to point the students work. It showed that the students had concentrated on the task, and if they still needed a help about the task, teacher would be available to help them. While student teacher B constantly observed the activity of the students, the students made inappropriate catchment of the instruction. The deictic gesture was used by teacher to correct the students in order to achieve the correct involvement in the activity. That is the way from the teacher to keep students in control and concentrate on the instruction. The gesture signals the students to reapply the instruction given previously. Finally, student teacher C implemented the deictic gesture while moving from one student to another in doing the given task. She pointed to the student’s task when student gazed at the teacher to ask help about the task. The gesture allowed teacher to check on the student who might be having difficulty with the individual work in order to prevent problems and initiate the desired result of the activity. More importantly, it is essential to catch problems early on in the lesson and correct student misunderstanding. Unlike the previous instances, student teacher D was the only one to use the beat gesture to follow up the instruction. While monitoring students to do the task of describing their friend drawing in three sentences, he 100 Daniela Sime, What do learners make ..... 223. digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id clapped once after che cking the students’ task one by one. This gesture indicated that teacher was pleased that the students applied the instruction correctly. Those findings suggest that teachers need to place themselves in a position to observe and be observed, accompanied with the synchronized gestures. Orlich also said that if the students know teacher is watching how they behave and interact, it will prevent many problems. 101 Overall, the findings suggested that the teacher’s gesture is a fundamental aspect of teacher- student interaction because gestures provide comprehensible input to foreign language students. Taleghani-Nikazm suggested that the shape of a gesture can be “recipient designed”. In other words, speakers perform gestures in a manner to make them interpretable by their recipient. 102 In the above-discussed data excerpts, teachers perform gestures elaborately to make them interpretable for their students. Although this data mentioned above cannot claim about the various aspects of teacher talk and gestures perceived by the students, it certainly provides relevant insights that we need to consider not only the verbal channel but also the visual channel to which they have access. 101 Donald C Orlich. et.al., Teaching Strategies ...... 202. 102 Carmen Taleghani- Nikazm, “Gestures in Foreign Language Classrooms: An Empirical Analysis of Their Organization and Function”. Selected Proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum, ed. Melissa Bowles, Rebecca Foote, Silvia Perpiñán, and Rakesh Bhatt. 2008, 236-237. digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 103

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

This chapter discusses about the conclusion of this research regarding the analysis of student teachers’ conversational hand gestures in giving instruction. Furthermore, this chapter also contains the suggestion regarding the research for students, lecturers, and also the next researchers.

A. Conclusion

Based on the data in research findings which were presented in the previous chapter, there are several points that can be concluded as following description: Student teachers enacted the conversational hand gestures to give instruction in microteaching class. The finding showed that the gestures supported the verbal elements in every step of instructions in order to give clearer understanding and active involvement of the students in the process of language learning. Student teachers used beat and iconic gestures to attract the students’ attention that resulted the increasing time of students’ focus on listening the teacher and task. In delivering the directions of the instruction, student teachers used deictic, iconic and beat gestures to manage the speech turn, organize group work, and assign various roles to students. Furthermore, student teachers mediated the expectation by gesturing to provide the meaning of particular lexical items of the instruction by eliciting the students with iconic, deictic and beat gestures. They next implemented deictic, iconic and beat gestures to restate the instruction whether the students had fully understood the instruction well. Lastly, student teacher followed up the instruction by monitoring the class in order to check the students’ involvement in activities and to provide help for students who may be having difficult. The deictic and beat gestures were enacted to constantly observe the activities of the students. There were only three out of four gestures that commonly used by student teachers to give instruction. The most chosen one was the deictic gestures. This gesture served different function in three steps: to deliver the directions, to restate the instruction, and

Dokumen yang terkait

Logical statement in student’s research proposal at English Teacher Education Department Islamic State University Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

0 1 63

English reading habit of student teachers at english teacher education department of Sunan Ampel State Islamic University: level and common factor analysis.

0 1 75

CULTURAL CONTENT IN SPEAKING FOR EVERYDAY COMMUNICATION CLASS IN ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 0 110

VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES IN INTERNSHIP PROGRAM AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF SUNAN AMPEL STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SURABAYA.

0 0 108

STUDENT TEACHERS’ SELF-EFFICACY IN USING INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES AT PRACTICE TEACHING CLASS (PPL I) OF ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

1 2 126

LANGUAGE FUNCTIONS IN STUDENT TEACHERS’ UTTERANCE: AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENT TEACHERS’ UTTERANCE IN PRE-SERVICE TEACHING : PPL 1 CLASSROOMS AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA ACADEMIC YEAR 2014-2015.

0 0 148

STUDENT TEACHERS’ ABILITY IN DESIGNING ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 0 108

THE STUDENTS` ABILITY TO THINK CRITICALLY IN CRITICAL READING CLASS AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND TEACHER TRAINING OF STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA 2015.

0 0 71

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 1 85

CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ LEARNING STYLE AND ACHIEVEMENT IN CRITICAL READING CLASS OF ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AT SUNAN AMPEL STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SURABAYA.

0 0 78