Survival in Hot Environments
13.4 Survival in Hot Environments
The same considerations apply to survival in hot environments as do for determining the upper lethal limit of animals. However, one additional factor needs
of sweating. The rate of sweat evaporation may be either environmentally or physiologically controlled. If the skin surface is wet, the rate of water loss
sweating is given by Eq. (12.16) with
If the skin surface is not wet, latent heat loss is controlled by sweat rate. Control of sweat rate is still not entirely understood, but apparently it involves sensing of surface heat flux (Kerslake 1972). Thus, changes in metabolic rate or external environment can cause changes in
Survival in Hot Environments 217
- maximum sweat rate
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 Air Vapor Pressure
13.4. Latent heat loss from the skin of heat-stressed humans as a function of vapor pressure and total vapor conductance. Skin temperature is assumed to be 35 C.
F IG URE
clothing and boundary layer conductance, and atmospheric vapor pres- sure. Boundary layer conductance for vapor transport is given by Eq. 7.33. In a 2.5
wind, boundary layer conductance,
2.5 mol
1.4 0.17 0.8 - The rightmost line in Fig. 13.4 therefore corresponds to the evaporation
rate wet
without clothing.
Example 3.2. What clothing conductance would allow skin to remain dry in a heat-stressed person if the vapor pressure of the air is 1.5
Solution. Consulting Fig. 13.4, with = 1.5 it is found that a conductance of 0.2 mol
limits latent heat loss, but a conductance of
does not. A conductance between these two, say 0.25 rnol ,
should therefore allow the to remain dry. This is the combined cloth- ing and boundary layer conductance. If the boundary layer conductance is 0.8 mol
then the clothing conductance would be
Survival under heat-stress conditions can be predicted using the energy budget equation, but it needs rederived without the assumption that
is combined with
as it is in Eq. (12.1 1).
most easily done
Humans and their Environment
by drawing an equivalent electrical circuit like Fig. 12.1, with thermal conductors being represented by electrical conductors, temperatures (heat concentrations) by voltages, and heat flux densities by current sources or sinks. The new diagram is like Fig. 12.1 except that the heat source in the body is M -
and an additional heat sink is added at the skin surface equal to
Writing the energy balance equation for this circuit gives
As an example of the use
we investigate the effect of clothing on the maximum operative temperature that can be tolerated by a person at various rates. We assume
(Table 12.2, vasodilated), = =
2.8 mol
see the previous example). Results of the calculations are shown
0.1 M, and
13.5. The part of the graph which shows increasing operative temperature with decreasing clothing conductance corresponds to the part of Fig. 13.4 where
is at its maximum. Adding clothing does not decrease the rate of evaporative cooling because it is already limited at the maximum sweat rate of the person. The clothing does, however, decrease the heat load on the person because the environment temperature is higher than
Heat and Vapor Conductance of Clothing
13.5. Maximum tolerable operative temperature for aperson as a function of clothing conductance. Vapor pressure is 1
F IG URE
wind speed if
The Humid Operative Temperature
the body temperature. Adding clothing therefore allows the person to tolerate a hotter environment. In a desert, with low vapor pressure and high solar loads, adding clothing (up to a point) decreases, rather than increases heat load on a person. The inflection point of the graph occurs when coat conductance becomes small enough to start controlling water loss.
Keep in mind that Fig. 13.5 is for a low vapor pressure. It does not apply at higher vapor pressure where any decrease in clothing conductance would reduce latent heat loss. If the atmospheric vapor pressure is high enough to keep the skin wet without clothing, then any addition of clothing will decrease dissipation of heat. This brings out the point that clothing must be matched to environment to be most useful in minimizing heat stress. Proper clothing for one hot environment would not necessarily be proper clothing for another.