Conceptual Framework LITERATURE REVIEW AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

38 realizations are used by both of the characters in giving commands and the relative power is the large contributing factor to their politeness strategies. These two researches are used as the comparison as well as the reference for the current study. The difference between these researches and the current research lies in the object and the focus of the study. The current study is aimed to examine the types of politeness strategies, the realizations of each strategy, and the affecting sociological factors in the utterances of the main character only.

B. Conceptual Framework

This research is under the field of pragmatics which discusses the phenomena of politeness along with their realizations and affecting sociological factors. This study is based on Brown and Levinson’s theory of politeness in Goody, 1978. The strategies studied here are those used by the main character of The Great Debaters movie, Melvin B. Tolson, who represents as a teacher character. In this movie the utterances performed by Melvin B. Tolson are analyzed in term of his politeness strategies which are divided into bald on-record strategies, positive politeness strategies, negative politeness strategies, and off- record strategies. The researcher also analyzes how the strategies are realized by him. Finally, the affecting sociological factors in politeness as in Brown and Levinson’s theory, i.e. rank of imposition, social distance, and relative power are the focus as well. Based on this conceptual framework, the researcher makes an analytical construct as shown below. 39 Figure 2. Analytical Construct Figure 2. Analytical Construct Bald on record Positive Politeness Negative Politeness Off record Types Realizations Sociological Factors Principles Relative Power A PRAGMATIC AN ALYSIS OF POLITENESS STRATEGIES PERFORMED BY THE MAIN CHARACTER IN DENZEL WASHINGTON’S THE GREAT DEBATERS MOVIE Strategies 1. No face redress in great hearer’s friendship urgency 4. Channel noise 2. Metaphorical urgency for 5. Task-oriented emphasis 6. Do not care to mantain hearer’s face or be rude 3. Metaphorical entreaties 7. Sympathetic advice or warning stressing high valuation of 8. FTA-oriented bald-on-record usage 1. Notice, attend to hearer 7. Presuppose or assert 11. Be Optimistic 2. Exaggerate common ground 12. Include both speaker 3. Intensify interest to hearer 8. Joke and hearer in the activity 4. Use in-group identity marker 9. Assert knowledge of and 13. Give reasons 5. Seek agreement concern for hearer’s wants 14. Assume reciprocity 6. Avoid agreement 10. Offer, promise 15. Give gifts to hearer 1. Be conventionally indirect 6. Apologize 2. Question, hedge 7. Impersonalize speaker and hearer 3. Be pessimistic 8. State the FTA as general rule 4. Minimize the imposition 9. Nominalize 5. Give deference 10. Go on record as incurring a debt Pragmatics Implicature 1. Give hints 6. Use tautologies 11. Be ambigous 2. Give association clues 7. Use contradictions 12. Be vague 3. Pressupose 8. Be ironic 13. Over-generalize 4. Understate 9. Use metaphors 14. Displace hearer 5. Overstate 10. Use rhetorical questions 15. Be incomplete, use ellipsis Speech Act Presupposition Deixis Social Distance Politeness Rank of Imposition Context The Great Debaters 40

CHAPTER III METHODS OF RESEARCH

This chapter is divided into six parts which are to be the guidelines on how this research was conducted. They are research type; form, source, and context of data; instruments; data collection technique; data analysis technique; and trustworthiness.

A. Type of the Study

Qualitative research is a type of research with a purpose to describe phenomena in narrative or textual mode, meaning that the description itself presented via words Vanderstoep Johnston, 2009: 7. Hence, the current research was conducted by using qualitative method precisely with descriptive method because its aim was to describe the politeness phenomena. It used quantitative method as well in order to measure the frequency of data occurrence. Pragmatic approach was used in this research since the researcher intended to collaborate meaning and context as the analysis of the research. Furthermore, the research focused on its analysis on the process of finding and making conclusion based on the research question made. On the whole, the researcher met the final analytic decision through following procedures such as collecting, classifying, analyzing and interpreting the data.

B. Form, Source and Context of Data

Data are crucial because they serve as the basis of the research Yin, 2011: 129. They are typically the result of measurement or research that can be