Different phonemic system Different pronunciation of equivalent phonemes

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 1. For the lectures The lecturer should be more aware to students’ error production regard to phonological interference. The lecture should correct and give students feedback if they mispronounce some English words in their performance, drill some common pattern error words because of phonological interference therefore the attitude to transfer their mother tongue system will be not habitual and established. 2. For the students The students should know their kind of phonological interference and factor causing error production in their speaking skill. They should pay more attention to their interference product and always check the correct pronunciation of some English words using digital dictionary will be recommended. 3. For the next researcher The researcher realizes that this study is not perfect enough to find phonological interference on students’ speaking performance. Therefore, the researcher expects for the next researchers can seek further information of kind phonological interference and factors causing the phonological interference refer to another theory due to this research still use the basic digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id theory of kind phonological interference formulated by Weinrich. Moreover, this study was limited to Javanese Surabaya dialect as the interfering language, the next researcher may conduct the study refer to other mother tongues which common find in students. Those will be expected to get the new and more information of phonological interference phenomenon as effort to overcome students’ difficulty in spoken repertoire. digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id REFERENCES Deepa Nayak, M.S. et.al. Phonological, Grammatical and Lexical Interference in Adult Multilingual Speakers. Language in India. Vol. 9. No. 6, 2009 David deterding. How Many Consonant Sounds Are There in English?. STETS Language Communication Review. Vol. 4. No. 1, 2005 George Yule. The Study of Language: Fourth Edition. UK: Cambridge University press, 2006 H. O’Connor, N. Gibson. A Step by Step Guide to Qualitative Data Analysis. Pimatiziwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health Vol. 1. No. 1 Jarvis Pavlenko, Scott Aneta, Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. Abingdon. Routledge, 2008 Juhana. Psychological Factors That Hinder Students from Speaking in English Class: A Case Study in a Senior High Schoolin South Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia. Journal of Education and Practice. Vol. 3. No. 12, 2012 Kircher on Phonology Uriel, Weinrich. Languages in Contact. New York: Mouton publisher, 1979 Wardaugh, R, an Introduction to Sociolinguistics. United Kingdom: Blackwell publishing, 2006 Wedhawati, et all. Tata Bahasa Jawa Mutakhir Revision Edition. Kanisius, 2006 Kathrine Rustipa. Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis, Interlanguage and Implication to Language Teaching. Stikubank University of Semarang, 2011 B. Leung, Cynthia and E. Brice, Alejandro. An Analysis of Phonological Processes Involved in Spoken English of Hong Kong Primary Pre-service Teachers. Language Testing in Asia. Vol. 2 Issue two, May 2012 Erdogan Bada. Native Language Influence on the Production of English Sounds by Japanese Learners. The Reading Matrix. Vol. 1. No. 2, September 2001