Different phonemic system Different pronunciation of equivalent phonemes
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
1. For the lectures
The lecturer should be more aware to students’ error production regard to phonological interference. The lecture should correct and give
students feedback if they mispronounce some English words in their performance, drill some common pattern error words because of phonological
interference therefore the attitude to transfer their mother tongue system will be not habitual and established.
2. For the students
The students should know their kind of phonological interference and factor causing error production in their speaking skill. They should pay more
attention to their interference product and always check the correct pronunciation of some English words using digital dictionary will be
recommended. 3.
For the next researcher The researcher realizes that this study is not perfect enough to find
phonological interference on students’ speaking performance. Therefore, the researcher expects for the next researchers can seek further information of
kind phonological interference and factors causing the phonological interference refer to another theory due to this research still use the basic
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
theory of kind phonological interference formulated by Weinrich. Moreover, this study was limited to Javanese Surabaya dialect as the interfering
language, the next researcher may conduct the study refer to other mother tongues which common find in students. Those will be expected to get the
new and more information of phonological interference phenomenon as effort to overcome students’ difficulty in spoken repertoire.
digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id
REFERENCES
Deepa Nayak, M.S. et.al. Phonological, Grammatical and Lexical Interference in Adult Multilingual Speakers. Language in India. Vol. 9. No. 6, 2009
David deterding. How Many Consonant Sounds Are There in English?. STETS Language Communication Review. Vol. 4. No. 1, 2005
George Yule. The Study of Language: Fourth Edition. UK: Cambridge University press, 2006
H. O’Connor, N. Gibson. A Step by Step Guide to Qualitative Data Analysis. Pimatiziwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health Vol. 1. No. 1
Jarvis Pavlenko, Scott Aneta, Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. Abingdon. Routledge, 2008
Juhana. Psychological Factors That Hinder Students from Speaking in English Class: A Case Study in a Senior High Schoolin South Tangerang, Banten,
Indonesia. Journal of Education and Practice. Vol. 3. No. 12, 2012
Kircher on Phonology
Uriel, Weinrich. Languages in Contact. New York: Mouton publisher, 1979 Wardaugh, R, an Introduction to Sociolinguistics. United Kingdom: Blackwell
publishing, 2006
Wedhawati, et all. Tata Bahasa Jawa Mutakhir Revision Edition. Kanisius, 2006
Kathrine Rustipa. Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis, Interlanguage and Implication to Language Teaching. Stikubank University of Semarang, 2011
B. Leung, Cynthia and E. Brice, Alejandro. An Analysis of Phonological Processes Involved in Spoken English of Hong Kong Primary Pre-service Teachers.
Language Testing in Asia. Vol. 2 Issue two, May 2012 Erdogan Bada. Native Language Influence on the Production of English Sounds by
Japanese Learners. The Reading Matrix. Vol. 1. No. 2, September 2001