1.4 PROBLEM CONSTRAINT AND ASSUMPTION
There are 4 aspects in good mining practice that should be considered, which are Mining Occupational Safety and Health K3, Mining Environmental
Protection, Mining Added Value Improvement and Mining Conservation. These 4 aspects can be grouped into 2 main aspects, which are qualitative aspect K3 and
Mining Added Value Improvement aspect and quantitative aspect Mining Environmental Protection and Mining Conservation. Since each aspect consists
of many parameters that should be included in evaluating mining company performance, so this research will be constrained on qualitative aspects only,
which are K3 and mining added value aspect. This research used assumption that there will be no bias value in scoring
particular mining company; every evaluator will give the appropriate score to a mining company they scored. There will be no extreme condition where one
evaluator gives a score contradictory to other evaluator. For example one evaluator gives 100 to particular component of good mining practice while others
give 0 or 20 for the same component evaluated.
1.5 USER IDENTIFICATION
Potential users of this system which are classified as stakeholders can be grouped into 3 types, which are:
1. Actor
Actor means the main user of the system, in this case is mining companies. The actor will use this system to key in their report directly through the
Internet.
7
2. Observer
Observer consists of institution academic community, research institution, and mining expertise association and public local community, independent
observer or NGO who is concerning about mining activities. Selected observer will monitor reports of particular mining company and giving value
or rate regarding the report based on their own expertise. 3.
Evaluator The evaluator of this system is the Department of Energy and Mineral
Resources DESDM. The evaluator will summary all of the rated report by the observer, and giving final evaluation regarding the performance of
mining companies.
1.6 THESIS STRUCTURE
Kategori