67
4.7.2 Teaching-learning Activity II
In teaching-learning Activity II I taught “Hobbies” as the material. The classroom teacher also observed the students and the teacher’s activities in this
meeting. The results of the observations are as follows: 1 Observation of the students’ activities
a. 40 students were present 100 b. 9 students actively asked questions 22.5
c. 8 students actively answered the teacher’s questions 20 d. 38 students actively worked in groups 95
e. 40 students did the activities asked by the teacher 100 f. 38 students paid attention to the teacher’s explanation 95
g. 40 students did not make some noise in the classroom 100 2 Observation of the teacher’s activities
a. The researcher was good enough in opening the lesson. b. The researcher gave enough chances to the students to be active during the
learning. c. The researcher was developing question-answer activity by giving enough
opportunity to students asking questions. d. The researcher was good in giving explanation of the teaching material.
e. The researcher was good enough in classroom management in handling the class.
f. The researcher showed fair attitude to students and warned the trouble maker in the classroom.
g. The researcher encouraged students to be more active in the classroom.
68
h. The researcher’s voice was loud and clears enough, so that all of the students could hear her voice.
i. The teaching media used was interesting so that most of the students enjoyed the lesson.
j. The researcher helped the students to review the teaching material, which made the students more understand what they have learnt.
69
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
5.1 Conclusion
In chapter IV the writer has analyzed the data statistically. Based on the statistical analysis, it could be seen that the mean score of the post-test was higher
than the mean score of the pre-test. In order to know whether the difference between the two means was significant or not, t-test was applied. The result of
computation was 15.03. The critical value for two tailed tests for 40 degrees of freedom 0.05 level of significance was 2.02.
Since the obtained t-value 15.03 was higher than the critical value at 0.05 alpha level of significance 2.00, the writer concluded that the test was
statistically significant. As the mean of the post-test was statistically higher than that of the pre-test, the writer concluded that the speaking mastery achieved by the
first year students of junior high school improved after they were taught using Audio-lingual teaching method.
After finishing the experiment, the writer concluded the advantages of using Audio-lingual teaching method to teach speaking to the first year student of
junior high school. The advantages could be described as follows: a. The students showed a great enthusiasm during the lesson
b. Using Audio-lingual teaching method to teach speaking to first year student of junior high school was very good. It was supported by the higher scores
gained by the students who have been taught using Audio-lingual teaching method.