The students’ ability in oral presentation in English Tourism at SMAN 1 Bangsal

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id Table 4.2 The second day collected the data The score of the students’ oral presentation in English Tourism object at SMAN 1 Bangsal. No Name Delivery ContentOrganization EnthusiasmAudience Awareness Total 1 Respondent 1 3 2 2 10 2 Respondent 2 3 3 2 8 3 Respondent 3 3 3 2 8 4 Respondent 4 4 2 2 8 5 Respondent 5 3 3 3 9 6 Respondent 6 4 3 3 11 7 Respondent 7 3 3 3 9 8 Respondent 8 4 3 3 7 9 Respondent 9 2 3 2 7 10 Respondent 10 3 3 3 9 11 Respondent 11 4 2 3 9 12 Respondent 12 3 4 3 10 13 Respondent 13 3 2 2 7 14 Respondent 14 3 3 2 8 15 Respondent 15 3 2 2 7 16 Respondent 16 2 2 2 6 17 Respondent 17 3 3 2 8 18 Respondent 18 3 2 2 7 19 Respondent 19 3 3 2 8 20 Respondent 20 4 4 4 12 21 Respondent 21 3 3 2 8 22 Respondent 22 4 4 4 12 23 Respondent 23 4 4 3 11 24 Respondent 24 2 3 3 8 25 Respondent 25 2 3 3 8 26 Respondent 26 4 3 3 10 27 Respondent 27 3 3 3 9 28 Respondent 28 3 3 3 9 29 Respondent 29 4 4 4 12 30 Respondent 30 4 3 3 10 31 Respondent 31 3 4 4 10 32 Respondent 32 3 3 2 8 33 Respondent 33 4 4 4 12 34 Respondent 34 2 2 2 6 35 Respondent 35 3 3 3 9 36 Respondent 36 3 3 3 9 Total 114 107 98 319 digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id Description: Then if the students score is 10-12 categorized Excellent High, 7-9 is categorized Good, 4-6 is categorized Fair and 1-3 is categorized Need Improvement Low. From the second research, there were 31 Excellent High students in oral presentation in English Tourism, 64 Good Students in oral presentation in English Tourism, 5 Fair students in oral presentation in English Tourism, and None students need improvement Low in oral presentation in English Tourism. Excellent 31 Good 64 Fair 5 Need Improvement The second day collected the data digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id

2. The students’ difficulties in oral presentation in English Tourism at SMAN 1

Bangsal based on The result of Semi-Opened questionnaire. After the students presented the Tourism in the Mojokerto, the researcher and the teacher already analyzed students’ oral presentation by using rubric. Then, the researcher gave the semi-opened questionnaire for students in the second day. From the result of Semi- Opened questionnaire, the researcher found out the students’ difficulties in oral presentation in English Tourism. This first data was conducted on Tuesday, 19 January. December 2015. There were 36 students as the subject. So, there are 36 data. It was found many kinds of students’ difficulties in oral presentation in English Tourism from the 10 questions in Semi- Opened questionnaire. 1. Do you like the oral presentation method in learning English Tourism Object? Yes No Why? …………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………… From the data, the researcher found; Table 4.3 digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id Yes No 16 20 And there are 5 kinds of the reason; A. The students not be able in Speak English B. The students feel difficult for memorizing and nervous C. The students think that Oral Presentation is efficient method to learn English D. Oral presentation method benefits for building students’ confidence E. Oral presentation takes a lot of time and make the students feel bored Table 4.4 A B C D E Total 10 8 14 2 2 36 Description; Yes 44 No 56 Students answer about the oral presentation method digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id There were 16 students answer ed “YES” and followed by two reasons. The first reason was students thought that oral presentation was efficient, easy and better to learn English C and there were 14 students answered with the same reason. Picture and explanation made the presentation easy to understand the presenter meant. The second reason was oral presentation In English Tourism Object could build students confidence D and there were 2 students answer with the same reason. Before, they having oral presentation in front of the class, they also practiced it first. The answer “NO” is followed by three reasons and 20 students answer “NO”. That was the most answer from the students in XII IPA 5. The first reason was the students not be able in speak English A and there were 10 students answered with the same reason. They felt so hard to have oral presentation using English. Most of the students said that they could have presentation in Indonesian not using English. The second reason was the students felt difficult for memorizing and nervous B and there were 8 students answered with the same reason. Most of the students said that when they had oral presentation in front of the class, they suddenly lost what they want to present because of nervous. It made them shy and did not say anything. Sometimes, the students made notes before they digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id having oral presentation in front of the class but they left their notes in their desk. Finally, they lost their materials. The third reason was oral presentation took a lot of time and made the students feel bored E and there were 2 students answered with the same reason. Many slides included in an oral presentation and it spent a lot of time. Two students said that one slide meant one explanation, it took a lot of time. 2. Do you know what oral presentation is? Yes No From the question, the students answer is: Table 4.5 Yes No 36 - A 28 B 22 C 39 D 5 E 6 Students reason

Dokumen yang terkait

THE EFFECT OF MIND MAPPING ON ORAL PRESENTATION OF THE 8th GRADE STUDENTS AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 06 DAU

2 13 20

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF JIGSAW TECHNIQUE IN IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ ORAL PRODUCTION OF RECOUNT TEXT AT THE FIRST GRADE OF SMAN 1 BANDAR SRIBHAWONO

0 6 65

THE USE OF ORAL ERROR CORRECTION IN STORYTELLING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 SIDOMULYO

0 4 55

STUDENTS’ ANXIETY IN CLASSROOM PRESENTATION AT ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF UMY

0 2 69

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ON PRESENTATION METHOD IN ENGLISH LEARNING AT ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA BATCH 2012

0 3 66

ERROR ANALYSIS IN ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS Error Analysis In Oral Production Made By English Department Students In Microteaching Class At Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 2 13

THE FUNCTION OF FIRST LANGUAGE IN TEACHING ENGLISH TO THE ELEVENTH GRADE OF SOCIAL STUDENTS AT SMAN 1 The Function Of First Language In Teaching English To The Eleventh Grade Of Social Students At Sman 1 Banyudono In 2015/2016 Academic Year.

0 4 12

PREZI: AN ONLINE TO OFFLINE ‘ZOOMING’ PRESENTATION SOFTWARE IN ORAL ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC SPEAKING STUDENTS.

0 1 3

The implementation of word wall vocabulary to teach spelling at English class students in MTsN Bangsal Mojokerto.

0 1 77

The Students’ Difficulties in Pronouncing The English Vowel at The Third Year of SMAN 1 Pitumpanua Wajo Regency - Repositori UIN Alauddin Makassar

0 2 64