A STUDY ON THE TEACHING SPEAKING METHOD USED BY DEBATE COACH IN TEACHING SPEAKING IN ILF (INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE FORUM) DEBATE CLASS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG

(1)

i

A STUDY ON THE TEACHING SPEAKING METHOD USED

BY DEBATE COACH IN TEACHING SPEAKING IN ILF

(INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE FORUM) DEBATE

CLASS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF

MUHAMMADIYAH

MALANG

THESIS

By:

ANGGA OKTA PRIA FAMBUDI

09360168

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION

UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG


(2)

ii

A STUDY ON THE TEACHING SPEAKING METHOD USED

BY DEBATE COACH IN TEACHING SPEAKING IN ILF

(INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE FORUM) DEBATE

CLASS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF

MUHAMMADIYAH

MALANG

THESIS

By:

ANGGA OKTA PRIA FAMBUDI

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION

UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG


(3)

iii

A STUDY ON THE TEACHING SPEAKING METHOD USED BY

DEBATE COACH IN TEACHING SPEAKING IN ILF

(INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE FORUM)

DEBATE CLASS AT THE UNIVERSITY

OF MUHAMMADIYAH

MALANG

THESIS

This Thesis is Submitted to Meet One of the Requirements to Achieve Sarjana Degree in English Education

Written by:

ANGGA OKTA PRIA FAMBUDI

09360168

MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF MALANG

FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINNING AND EDUCATION

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT

OCTOBER 2013


(4)

iv

This thesis written by Angga Okta Pria Fambudi was approved on October 28, 2013.

By:


(5)

v

This thesis was defended in front of the examiners of Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of University of Muhammadiyah Malang

and accepted as one of the requirements to achieve Sarjana Degree in English Education

on October 28, 2013

Approved by:

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Examiners:

1. Dr. Hartono, M.Pd 1. ………

2. Riza Elfana, M.A 2. ………

3. Bayu H. Wicaksono, M.Ed, Ph.D 3. ………


(6)

vi

Motto and Dedication

Motto

“It is ok to not be perfect. It is ok to make mistakes.

It’s ok to do something that you wish you had not done,

Because if we do not do those things, we never grow”

(Dawn Stanyon)

DEDICATION

I dedicate this thesis to:

My beloved parents

Mr M.Yunus and Mrs Jariyah

My sister

Putri and Febtriana

My Comrades

EDS (English Debate Society) debaters

ILF(International Language Forum)

For giving me an endless prayer, motivation


(7)

vii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Alhamdulillahirabbalalamin. That is the first sentence thought by the researcher when he completed this thesis. The researcher felt very thankful because of the blessing and mercy from Allah, he could finish it very well.

The researcher realized that this thesis would not have been finished without much help and guidance from the people around him. The researcher greatest appreciation goes to researcher beloved parents, Mr M.Yunus and Mrs Jariyah for their endless praying and support during this thesis preparation. The next gratitude would be kindly delivered to Mr Bayu Hendro Wicaksono, M.Ed, Ph.D and Mr Soeparto, M.Pd. It was all because of their patience and guidance for every chapter and every difficulty found by the researcher, this thesis could be well done.

The last greatest appreciation would be delivered to ILF (International Language Forum) student unit activity for allowing the researcher to conduct the research in ILF debate class.

This thesis is submitted to fulfill the requirement to achieve Bachelor Degree of English Department. The researcher hopes this thesis could be beneficial for Educational practicing in Indonesia, especially in English learning.


(8)

viii

TABLE F CONTENTS

APPROVAL ... i

LEGALIZATION ... ii

MOTTO AND DEDICATON ... iii

ABSTRACT ... iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ... v

TABLE OF CONTENTS ... vi

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the study ... 1

1.2 Statement of the Problem ... 5

1.3 Purpose of the study ... 5

1.4 Significant of the study ... 5

1.5 Scope and limitation of the study ... 6

1.6 Definition of key terms ... 6

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 2.1 Debate ... 8

2.1.1 The Elements of Debate (Internal Factor of debate) ... 10

2.1.1.1 Motion ... 10

2.1.1.2 Arguments ... 10

2.1.1.3 Point of information ( P.O.I) ... 10


(9)

ix

2.1.1.5 Judges ... 11

2.1.2 External Factor of Debate ... 11

2.1.2.1 The Condition of Debating Class ... 11

2.1.2.2 The Real Practice of Debate ... 12

2.1.2.3 Bounding ... 12

2.2 Kinds of Debate... 12

2.2.1 The American Format... 13

2.2.2 The British Format ... 14

2.3 Teaching English ... 16

2.3.1 Theory of Teaching English ... 16

2.3.2 Approach ... 16

2.3.2.1 Total Physical Response. ... 16

2.3.2.2 Community Language Teaching. ... 17

2.3.2.3 Content Based. ... 17

2.3.2.4 Participatory Approach ... 18

2.3.2.5 Task Based... 18

2.3.3 Method ... 18

2.3.3.1 Grammar Translation... 19


(10)

x

2.3.3.3 Audio Lingual. ... 19

2.3.3.4 The Silent Way ... 20

2.3.3.5 Community Language Learning ... 20

2.3.3.6 Desuggestopedia ... 21

2.3.4 Technique ... 22

2.3.4.1 Role Play ... 22

2.3.4.2 Presentation ... 22

2.3.4.3 Group Work ... 22

2.3.4.4 Discussion... 23

2.3.4.5 Game... 23

2.4 Teaching speaking ... 23

2.5 Teaching Academic Debating. ... 24

2.6 Lecturer ... 25

2.7 Coach . ... 25

2.8 Learning English ... 26

2.8.1 Learning English for EFL ... 26

2.9 Nature of EFL Learner ... 27

2.10 Previous Study ... 28

CHAPTER III RESEARCH DESIGN 3.1 Research Design ... 30


(11)

xi

3.2 Research Subject ... 31

3.3 Data Collection ... 33

3.3.1 Research Instrument ... 34

3.3.1.1 Observation... 34

3.3.1.2 Interview ... 35

3.4 Procedure of Data Collection ... 37

3.5 Data Analysis ... 39

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Research Findings ... 41

4.2 Discussion ... 53

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 5.1 Conclusion ... 59

5.2 Suggestion ... 60

REFERENCES ... 62

APPENDICES Appendix 1: Observation Transcript ... 64

Appendix 2: Letter of Interview Agreement ... 72

Appendix 3: Transcript of Interview ... 75

Appendix 4: Observation Agreement Letter ... 77


(12)

xii

REFERENCES

Ary, D, Lucy CJ, Sorensen C & Asghar R. 2009. Introduction to Research in Education. Canada: Wad Sworth, Cengage Learning

Brown, H. Douglas. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching 4th Edition. New York: Longman, Inc

Ellis, Randy, Meriann F. 2011. Debate. United Stated of America: South-Western- Cengage Learning Saxena Mukul, Tope Ominoyi. 2010. Contending With Globalization in World Englishes. Bristol: Short Run Press Ltd

Flick, Uwe, Ernst V.K & Ines S. 2004. A Companion to Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publication Ltd

Fraenkel, Jack R. 2009. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. America: Mc Graw-Hill

Freely, Austin J, Steinberg, David L. 2008. Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making 12th edition. Australia: Wadsworth Cengage Learning

Fuad, Erik Kemal. 2004. A study on The differences Between Australian and Parliamentary Conducted by The Language Center of University of Muhammadiyah Malang and Australian Parliamentary System. UMM: Unpublished Thesis

Gebhard, Jerry G. 2000. Teaching English as a Foreign or Second Language: A Teacher Self-development and Methodology Guide.United States: The University of Michigan Press

Hayes, Dennis, Toby M & Alec T. 2007. A lecturer's Guide to Further Education. London: Open University Press

Jain, Praveen M. 2008. English Language Teaching: Method, Tools and Technique. Jaipur: Sunrise

Larsen Dianne, Freeman. 2000. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press

Meany, John, Kate S. 2002. Art Argument and Advocacy - Mastering Parliamentary Debate. New York: International Debate Education Association

Murcia, Marianne Celce. 2001. Teaching Englias as a Second or Foreign Language. United States of America: Thomson Learning Wahyurianto, Ibnu. 2009. The


(13)

xiii

Proficiency in ESP Speaking Class at Bahasa Indonesia Department of UMM. UMM: Unpublished Thesis

Nafsiyah, Khoirotun. 2011. An Analysis of Language Style Used by English Club Debaters at ILF (International Language Forum) University of Muhammadiyah Malang. UMM: Unpublished Thesis

Phipps Kelly, Eric T & Will T. 2002. Teaching Argumentation and Debate: An Educator's Activities Manual. National Association of Urban Debate

Richards, Jack C, Theodore, S.R. 2001. Approach and Method in Language Teaching. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press

Rybold, Garry. 2006. Speaking, Listening and Understanding Debate For Non-native English Speakers. New York: International Debate Education Association Thornburry, Scott. 2007. How to Teach Speaking. Pearson Longman

Training, MTD. 2010. Coaching and Mentoring. Ventus Publishing ApS

Umam, Mushodikul. 2007. A study on the Difficulties Faced by the Debaters of University of Muhammadiyah Malang in Joinning Australian Parliamentary System Debate. UMM: Unpublished Thesis


(14)

1

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

In this chapter, the researcher is trying to discuss background of the study, statements of the problem, purpose of the study, significance of the study, scope and limitation of the study and definition of the key terms. Each will be as below.

1.1 Background of the Study

Being able to speak in the target language is considered as one of the indicators that every learner is mastering the target language. Likewise in English, the learners are called to acquire the language well if they are able to produce some words orally and communicate English properly. In line with the important of spoken language, Omoniyi (2010) has stated, “Proficiency in English as a communication

skill is perceived as a crucial skill for survival” (pp. 23). The demand of mastering

English speaking ability not only comes from the internal place of education where the study tooknplace but also comes from the external factors of educational sector. For example; in the educational sector such as school and university, the ability of speaking English is important to help students having better communication to gain a knowledge from foreigners who recently the number of their involvement in our education greatly increase. Another example is in non-educational sector; currently, many local companies build its relation with foreign company to develop its business range. This situation requires companies to use English as a working language because in multicultural business relation, the possibilities of working with foreigner are inevitable. The result is that many job occupancies, whether it is specific in


(15)

2

foreign company or local company and even educational based, required another additional basic skill, that of English speaking ability.

Nowadays there are lots of methods used to teach speaking such as using Total physical response, The silent way, Community language learning, suggestopedia, group discussion, speaking games, role play and debating. Each method has different strength to interest learners to learn speaking. First, group discussion is a good practice to study together and courage learners bravery to work and share their idea with others. Second, speaking games has it strength to package a process of teaching and learning in fun way. Third, role play has it powers of asking students in performing and action and creates an interesting act while they are learning. According to the above examples, then, debate has its power to develop students critical thinking and also speaking by working in a group.

Most of the method has its power to develop learners speaking ability and some of the techniques have been proven its effectiveness to develop learners speaking ability. For the example, the research on group discussion held by Ibnu Wahyu at Bahasa Indonesia ESP class in the University of Muhammadiyah Malang (2009). Ibnu’s research shows that group discussion may improve the student’s fluency in speaking.

Before talking further about the effective teaching method used to teach speaking, we need to know the problem that commonly appear in speaking class. In his book Thornbury (2007) said that, “ the problem of speaking ability come from the students themselves; such as problem in expressing an idea, always repeating the


(16)

3

problem, Rybold (2006) suggest, “ the use of debate as an effective way to teach speaking will help learners to overcome their fear and develop oral English skills” (pp. 2).

According to Steinberg (2008) debate is “ process of inquiry and advocacy, a way of arriving at a reasoned judgment to preposition”(pp.6). People debate by explaining a concept of idea using a persuasive manner through his ability of speaking. The concept of debate is not only focus in developing the critical thinking but it does also can be expanded to the field of educational aspect in which teaching English skills especially speaking.

The teaching of academic debating is not a new method that lecturers used to teach in class. Many lectures sometimes used this way to teach English to their students. Teaching academic debating is not only used by the lecturers to teach students in class but also in several places such as student’s unit activity which focused in developing English skill.

In students’ unit activity, the process of teaching academic debating is

completely different compare with the teaching academic debating that used by lecturer to teach in class. This could happen because students’ unit activity which has debating club only focused in teaching debating while in a real class we cannot use only one method to teach learners because real class has more heterogenic learners and interest and they are not focus in only learning debating. This fact can implicitly show us that the academic debating method that is used by debating club to teach English especially speaking is more varieties and specific compare to the academic debating method used in the regular English majoring class.


(17)

4

Recently, debate is being popular and famous in our country. This popularity is proved by the increase in number of debating club and debating event in the last three years. The learners' interest in joining debating raise up because many of learners want to have a good English ability especially speaking like what debaters have after learning academic debating. ILF (International Language Forum) is the one of the student’s unit activity which has known as the most active and proficient English debating club at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang. Furthermore, ILF has various activities to develop their members' English skill, such as debating, conversation, news casting, speech and scrabble. From several activities that ILF provides to increase their member’s English skill, debating is the most dominant activity that is followed most by the members. The member’s interest in joining debating class gradually increases because they were motivated to have good English like the registered debating class member. Furthermore many learners want to get achievements from debating because ILF debater’s often won in several debating competition.

In the purpose to know more about debating in detail, there were several researches which had been conducted. One of them is Nafsiyah’s research held in ILF at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang. In her research, Nafsiyah (2011) focused on language style used by debaters. In the research, it was found that debaters used several language styles, such as formal style, consultative, intimate style, casual and frozen.

Following the previous research and to know further how the teaching method play in this field of study, this present study is going to investigate one step


(18)

5

forward from linguistic field by finding out the method of teaching speaking using academic debating used by ILF debating club at the university of Muhammadiyah Malang. This research could be considered as a new reference of finding out a new method in teaching speaking using academic debating. This research is still limited particularly on academic debating teaching method only.

1.2 Statement of the Problems

Dealing with the problem stated in the background, the researcher formulated the research questions as below:

1. What is the teaching speaking method used by debating coach in debating class at ILF (International Language Forum)?

2. How is the implementation of the teaching speaking method used by debate coach in debating class at ILF (International Language Forum)?

1.3 Purpose of the study

In line with the research questions in this present study, the researcher designs the purpose of this present study as:

1. To describe the teaching speaking method used by the debate coach in ILF (International Language Forum)

2. To find out the direct implementation of the teaching speaking method used by debate coach in ILF (International Language Forum).


(19)

6

1.4 Significant of the study

After studying and analyzing the problem, the researcher expects that this study gives contributions both theoretical and practical benefits.

1. Theoretically, the result of this study is useful to give contributions to the development of English teaching method especially speaking in order to help students mastering speaking proficiency.

2. Practically, this study is expected to give the input to lecturers about an alternative method in teaching English especially speaking and for the students, this study can give them a new motivation and guidance in improving speaking proficiency.

1.5 Scope and limitation of the study

The scope of this study is limited in finding out the method of teaching speaking in debating class used by debate coach at ILF (International Language Forum) in 2013.

The limitation of this study is only limited in ILF (International Language Forum) Debating class. The participants of the debating class come from different major of study such as English education, pharmacy, international relation, public communication and engineering.

The purposes of the study are; for the lecturers, it can contibute a new reference of method to the English teaching especially speaking, and for learners it can contribute a new motivation and guidance to learn English skill especially speaking.


(20)

7

1.6 Definition of key terms

In order to avoid misunderstanding and misinterpretation the meaning of the term in this study, the definition of key term is presented. Those terms are:

1. Speaking refers to an ability of the students to express the ideas, feeling, and opinion orally in simple utterances and in a suitable context(Brown 2000).

2. Debate refers to the process of inquiry and advocacy, a way of arriving at a reasoned judgment to preposition (Steinberg 2008).

3. Teaching method refers to a systematic and scientific way of teaching any subject. It guide lecturers” How to teach” and “How his teaching may be

effective” (Jain 2008).

4. ILF (International Language Forum) refers to student unit activity in University of Muhammadiyah Malang which focuses in developing English skill focused in speaking, News casting, speech and debate.

5. Coach is someone who is inspiring, energizing and facilitating the performance, learning and development of learners (Training 2010)


(21)

8

To sum up, this chapter has already highlighted the introduction of the study that consist of; background of the study, statement of problems, purpose of the study, significant of the study, scope and limitation of the study and the definition of the key term.

In order to expand the chapter one and to give more clear understanding about this research, chapter two will discuss about the review on the literature namely; teaching English for EFL, the nature of Learner in EFL Country, teaching method and learning strategy in English, Debate, Teaching academic debating and kind of Debate.


(1)

problem, Rybold (2006) suggest, “ the use of debate as an effective way to teach speaking will help learners to overcome their fear and develop oral English skills” (pp. 2).

According to Steinberg (2008) debate is “ process of inquiry and advocacy, a way of arriving at a reasoned judgment to preposition”(pp.6). People debate by explaining a concept of idea using a persuasive manner through his ability of speaking. The concept of debate is not only focus in developing the critical thinking but it does also can be expanded to the field of educational aspect in which teaching English skills especially speaking.

The teaching of academic debating is not a new method that lecturers used to teach in class. Many lectures sometimes used this way to teach English to their students. Teaching academic debating is not only used by the lecturers to teach students in class but also in several places such as student’s unit activity which focused in developing English skill.

In students’ unit activity, the process of teaching academic debating is completely different compare with the teaching academic debating that used by lecturer to teach in class. This could happen because students’ unit activity which has debating club only focused in teaching debating while in a real class we cannot use only one method to teach learners because real class has more heterogenic learners and interest and they are not focus in only learning debating. This fact can implicitly show us that the academic debating method that is used by debating club to teach English especially speaking is more varieties and specific compare to the academic debating method used in the regular English majoring class.


(2)

Recently, debate is being popular and famous in our country. This popularity is proved by the increase in number of debating club and debating event in the last three years. The learners' interest in joining debating raise up because many of learners want to have a good English ability especially speaking like what debaters have after learning academic debating. ILF (International Language Forum) is the one of the student’s unit activity which has known as the most active and proficient English debating club at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang. Furthermore, ILF has various activities to develop their members' English skill, such as debating, conversation, news casting, speech and scrabble. From several activities that ILF provides to increase their member’s English skill, debating is the most dominant activity that is followed most by the members. The member’s interest in joining debating class gradually increases because they were motivated to have good English like the registered debating class member. Furthermore many learners want to get achievements from debating because ILF debater’s often won in several debating competition.

In the purpose to know more about debating in detail, there were several researches which had been conducted. One of them is Nafsiyah’s research held in ILF at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang. In her research, Nafsiyah (2011) focused on language style used by debaters. In the research, it was found that debaters used several language styles, such as formal style, consultative, intimate style, casual and frozen.


(3)

forward from linguistic field by finding out the method of teaching speaking using academic debating used by ILF debating club at the university of Muhammadiyah Malang. This research could be considered as a new reference of finding out a new method in teaching speaking using academic debating. This research is still limited particularly on academic debating teaching method only.

1.2 Statement of the Problems

Dealing with the problem stated in the background, the researcher formulated the research questions as below:

1. What is the teaching speaking method used by debating coach in debating class at ILF (International Language Forum)?

2. How is the implementation of the teaching speaking method used by debate coach in debating class at ILF (International Language Forum)?

1.3 Purpose of the study

In line with the research questions in this present study, the researcher designs the purpose of this present study as:

1. To describe the teaching speaking method used by the debate coach in ILF (International Language Forum)

2. To find out the direct implementation of the teaching speaking method used by debate coach in ILF (International Language Forum).


(4)

1.4 Significant of the study

After studying and analyzing the problem, the researcher expects that this study gives contributions both theoretical and practical benefits.

1. Theoretically, the result of this study is useful to give contributions to the development of English teaching method especially speaking in order to help students mastering speaking proficiency.

2. Practically, this study is expected to give the input to lecturers about an alternative method in teaching English especially speaking and for the students, this study can give them a new motivation and guidance in improving speaking proficiency.

1.5 Scope and limitation of the study

The scope of this study is limited in finding out the method of teaching speaking in debating class used by debate coach at ILF (International Language Forum) in 2013.

The limitation of this study is only limited in ILF (International Language Forum) Debating class. The participants of the debating class come from different major of study such as English education, pharmacy, international relation, public communication and engineering.

The purposes of the study are; for the lecturers, it can contibute a new reference of method to the English teaching especially speaking, and for learners it can contribute a new motivation and guidance to learn English skill especially speaking.


(5)

1.6 Definition of key terms

In order to avoid misunderstanding and misinterpretation the meaning of the term in this study, the definition of key term is presented. Those terms are:

1. Speaking refers to an ability of the students to express the ideas, feeling, and opinion orally in simple utterances and in a suitable context(Brown 2000).

2. Debate refers to the process of inquiry and advocacy, a way of arriving at a reasoned judgment to preposition (Steinberg 2008).

3. Teaching method refers to a systematic and scientific way of teaching any subject. It guide lecturers” How to teach” and “How his teaching may be effective” (Jain 2008).

4. ILF (International Language Forum) refers to student unit activity in University of Muhammadiyah Malang which focuses in developing English skill focused in speaking, News casting, speech and debate.

5. Coach is someone who is inspiring, energizing and facilitating the performance, learning and development of learners (Training 2010)


(6)

To sum up, this chapter has already highlighted the introduction of the study that consist of; background of the study, statement of problems, purpose of the study, significant of the study, scope and limitation of the study and the definition of the key term.

In order to expand the chapter one and to give more clear understanding about this research, chapter two will discuss about the review on the literature namely; teaching English for EFL, the nature of Learner in EFL Country, teaching method and learning strategy in English, Debate, Teaching academic debating and kind of Debate.