27
was they would have some times to think to answer the questions in the questionnaire. Hence, they could provide the best answer they could give.
The writer had an interview with nine students on May 17
th
– 26
th
2010. Before having the interview, the writer analyzed the questionnaire filled by those
nine students. The writer did the interview to get their deeper perception about the feedback and their teaching performance after having the feedback. Afterward, to
see whether there was an improvement on their teaching performance and to check the result of the interview, the writer observed video recordings of three
students’ performance of their progress test 1 and final test. The writer compared the first and the second video to see the improvement.
E. Data Analysis Technique
All the data gained through some techniques using certain instruments were analyzed to obtain the result of the research. The first data to analyze were the
data gained from the first observation to three Microteaching classes. The data provided information about what feedback that the students got from the lecturers.
The data would be categorized to make it easier to observe the time and the way of every lecturer in giving feedback. The data collected through the observation
on three different lecturers would be compared to show that there were different ways of giving feedback from one lecturer to another. Each item of the
observation sheet would be presented in a form of table to show the difference. The data would be analyzed later by elaborating it with the data gained through
the second observation, interview and questionnaire.
28
The second data to analyze was gained from questionnaire. The result of the questionnaire provided data about students’ perception on the feedback they got
and how they improved after having one. First, the writer counted how many ticks were put in the degree of agreement of “strongly agree”, “agree”, “neutral”,
“disagree”, and “strongly disagree” for each item. Second, the raw data from the
calculation was counted into percentage using the formula below:
∑ : Total
SD : The number of “Strongly Disagree” D
: The number of “Disagree” N
: The number of “Neutral” A
: The number of “Agree” SA : The number of “Strongly Disagree”
n : Number of Students
Third, the data from the questionnaire was recorded in the table below.
Table 1. The Result of the Closed Response of the Questionnaires
No. Items The Degree of Agreement
SD D N A SA
1. … 16. …
∑ SD ∑ n
X 100 1
∑ SA ∑ n
X 100 5
∑ D ∑ n
X 100 2
∑ N ∑ n
X 100 3
∑ A ∑ n
X 100 4
29
Table 2. The Result of the Open Response of the Questionnaires
Participant Answer 1. …
63. … The next data to be analyzed was the raw data from the interview. The
result from the interview was recorded in interview transcript. The data from the interview and video recording of three students’ performances would be analyzed
to see their improvement by comparing their teaching performance on the first and final test.
Having all the data needed, the last thing the writer analyzed was about the final result of how the way the lecturers giving feedback, students’ perception
on the feedback and their improvement, and also their suggestions on the way supervisor’s giving feedback through the result of the observation, questionnaire,
and interview.
F. Research Procedure
