Kesimpulan Beradasarkan hasil penelitian analaisis miskonsepsi pada Buku Ajar Biologi
66
DAFTAR PUSTAKA Abimola, I.O., Baba, S. 1996. Misconceptions and alternative cenceptions in
science textbooks: The role of teacher as filters. The American Biology Teacher, 58 : 14-19.
Adisendjadja.Y.H., 2006. Analisis Buku Ajar Biologi SMA Kelas X di Bandung berdasarkan Literasi Sains. Bandung: Pend. Biologi FPMPA UPI.
Adisandjadja.Y.H., Romlah, O. 2008. Identifikasi Kesalahan dan Miskonsepsi Buku Teks Biologi SMU. Bandung: Pend.Biologi FPMIPA UPI Bandung
http: www.bio-upi.com
, diakses 3 Agustus 2015. Ajewole, G. A. 1991. Effect of discovery and expository instructional methods
on the attitude of student to biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 28 ; 401-409.
Anonim. 2004. Kerangka Dasar Kurikulum 2004. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Anonim. 2005 Kamus Beasr Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Ke-3. Jakarta: Balai
Pustaka. Anonim. 2005. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 11 Tahun 2005
tentang Buku Teks Pelajaran. Pusat Perbukuan. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Anonim. 2006. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No. 19 Tahun 2005
tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta : Depdiknas. Bahar, M. 2003 Misconception in Biology Education Conceptual Change
Strategies. Education Science. Theory Practice, 55 – 64. Boo, H. K. 2005. Primary Science Assesment Item Setters’ Misconceptions
Concerning Biological Scince Concepts. Asian-Pasific Forum on Scince Learning and Teaching. 8: 1-13.
Brandwein, P. F. 1981. Memorandum on Renewing Schooling and Education. In R.E. Yager J.E. Penick 1987, Resolving the Crisis in science
education: Understanding before revolution. Science Education. 71: 49-55
Bukit, I. 2011. Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Guru Biologi pada Materi Respirasi dan Fotosintesis di SMA se-Kota Medan. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Medan :
Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Medan.
Campbell, Reece, Mitchell, 2008. Biology, 8
nd
ed. California : Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company.
Campbell, Reece. 2010. Biologi Edisi Kedelapan Jilid 1. Terjemahan oleh: Damaring Tyas Wulandari. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Campbell, Reece. 2003. Biologi Edisi Kelima Jilid 2. Terjemahan oleh: Wasmen Manalu. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Campbell, Reece. 2004. Biologi Edisi Kelima Jilid 3. Terjemahan oleh: wasmen Manalu. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Chen, C. C., Lin, H.S., Lin, M. L. 2002. Developing a Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument to Asseses High School Stydent’s Understanding-The
Formation of Images by a Plane Mirror. Proceeding of National Science Council, 12: 106-121.
Chiappetta, E.L., Ganesh, T.G., Lee, Y. H., Philips, M. C. 2006. Examination of science textbook analysis research conducted on textbook published
over the past 100 years in the United States. http: reports. ncse. comindex. phpncsearticledownload4767, diakses pada 3 Agustus
2015.
Chiang-Soong,B R.E. Yager 1993. Readability Levels of The Science Text Books Most Used in Secondary Schools. School Science and
Mathematics.
Dahar, R.W. 1996. Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta Proyek pembangunan Lembaga Pendidik Tenaga Kependidikan.
Dalimunthe, R. 2014. Analisis Miskonsepsi Pokok Bahasan Sel pada Buku Teks Biologi Kelas XI di SMA Negeri Se- Kota Binjai. Tesis tidak diterbitkan.
Medan: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Medan.
Dikmenli, M., Cardak, O. 2009. Conceptual Problem In Biology-Related Topics In Primary Scince and Tecnolgy Texbooks In Turkey.
International Journal of Enviromental Science Education, 4 : 429- 440.
Ekici, F., Ekici, E. 2007. Utility of Concept Cartoons in Diagnosing and Overcoming Misconceptions Related to Photosynthesis. International
Journal of Enviromental and Science Education, 2: 111-124. Ergul, R, Yeter Simsekli, Sevgil Caliz. Zehra Ozdilek, Sirin Gocmencelebi,
Meral Sanli. 2011. The Effects of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching On Elementary School Students’ Science Process Skills And Science
Attitudes. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Eduction Policy BJSEP, 5: 48-68.
Finley, F., Lawrence, F., Heller, P. 1992. “Analysis of Science
Textbooks”.Journal of Science Education. 76 3: 313-316.