The Result of the Expert Judgment and Revision Unit 2

Task 11 - No revision Task 12 - No revision Task 13 - No revision Task 14 - No revision Task 15 - No revision

b. The Result of the Expert Judgment and Revision Unit 2

1 The Result of the Expert Judgment Unit 2 a The Appropriateness of the Content The analysis of the content appropriateness is shown by Table 4.27. Table 4.27 The Appropriateness of the Content of Unit 2 Item Number Statement Score 1 The developed materials are suitable for the needs of the students of International Study program of Mathematics Education in semester four. 4 2 The developed materials are suitable for the academic context of the students of International Study program of Mathematics Education in semester four. 4 3 The developed materials contain texts which are appropriate with the needs of the students of International Study program of Mathematics Education in semester four. 3 4 The developed materials contain language functions which are appropriate with the academic context of the students of International Study program of Mathematics Education in semester four. 4 5 The texts are suitable with the topic. 3 6 The pictures are suitable with the topic. 3 7 The tables are suitable with the topic. 4 8 The developed materials encourage the students to do interpersonal and transactional communication. 4 9 The developed materials encourage the students to understand the meaning structures and linguistics features of the texts. 4 10 The developed materials lead the students to develop their communication skill accurately and appropriately based on a communicative context. 4 11 The developed materials motivate the students to 4 develop personal, social and academic life skills. Mean  3.7 Table 4.27 shows that the mean value of the appropriateness of the content of unit 2 is 3.7. It is categorized as “Good” due to its position in the interval 3.5 x 3.74. b The Appropriateness of the Language Table 4.28 shows the analysis of the language appropriateness. Table 4.28 The Appropriateness of the Language of Unit 2 Item Number Statement Score 12 The language used is suitable for the English proficiency of the students of International Study program of Mathematics Education in semester four. 4 13 The instructions and explanations in the materials can be easily understood by the students of International Study program of Mathematics Education in semester four. 4 14 The language used in the materials is grammatically correct. 3 15 The spelling is in accordance with the principles of English grammar. 3 16 The choice of words of the materials is in accordance with the principles of English grammar. 3 17 The information in the materials is coherence. 4 18 The information in the materials is cohesive. 4 Mean  3.6 Table 4.28 shows that the mean value of the appropriateness of the language of unit 2 is 3.6. It is categorized as “Good” due to its position in the interval 3.5 x 3.74. c The Appropriateness of the Presentation Table 4.29 shows the analysis of the presentation appropriateness. Table 4.29 The Appropriateness of the Presentation of Unit 2 Item Number Statement Score 19 The tasks are sequences from the easiest one to the most difficult one. 4 20 The number of the task is balance among the units. 4 21 The tasks are students-centered. 4 22 The tasks encourage the students to participate actively in the classroom. 4 23 The tasks encourage the students to do oral communication effectively. 4 24 The tasks encourage the students to be creative in the process of learning. 3 25 The tasks encourage the students to be responsible in their own learning process. 4 26 The tasks encourage the students to know their success and lack in the learning and in communicating in English. 4 27 The tasks cover evaluation task in order to measure the students’ ability about the materials that they have learned. 3 28 The tasks contain vocabulary related to the topic of the unit. 4 29 The tasks consist of guided activities and free-guided activity 4 30 The unit consists of opening activities. 4 31 The unit consists of main activities. 4 32 The unit consists of closing activities. 4 Mean  3.8 Table 4.29 shows that the mean value of the appropriateness of the presentation of unit 2 is 3.8. It is categorized as “Very Good” due to its position in the interval 3.75 x 4. d The Appropriateness of the Layout Table 4.30 shows the analysis of the presentation appropriateness. Table 4.30 The Appropriateness of the Layout of Unit 2 Item Number Statement Score 33 The design of the materials uses good typography Unit title, sub-title, page numbers, illustrations, caption and soon 3 34 The fonts are not too various. 4 35 The fonts are readable. 4 36 The colors used do not disturb the delivery of information. 3 37 The pictures are provided for aesthetic purposes 3 38 The pictures are provided for functional purposes 3 Mean  3.3 Table 4.30 shows that the mean value of the appropriateness of the layout of unit 2 is 3.3. It is categorized as “Fair” due to its position in the interval 3.25 x 3.49. Finally, the mean value from all aspects of unit 2 is 3.7. It can be concluded that unit 1 is categorized as “Good” since the position of the mean value is in the interval 3.5 x 3.74. 2 The Review of Unit 2 From all aspects above, it shows that the developed learning materials are appropriate. However, there are some parts that still need to be revised. In general, the review of unit 2 has the same aspect of revisions as unit 1. First of all, in term of content, if it is possible, add some texts talking about the topic. Some questions in the comprehension tasks are just too easy for university students. Therefore, it will be better to change the questions into high- order thinking questions. In term of language, it is better to be careful in using perfect tense. Check whether the perfect tense that are used in instructions do not cause misunderstanding for example “you have learned” is written “you have been learned”. For the presen tation, there’s no need to do revision. However, in term of lay out, it is better to give more white spaces so the pages in the materials are not too crowded and more pictures to give illustration of the conveyed information. 3 The Revision of Unit 2 In order to improve the quality of the developed learning materials, the experts gave some suggestions and recommendations to revise some aspects of the developed learning materials. Table 4.31 in the following describes the point of revisions of unit 2 and the revisions. Table 4.31 The Revisions of Unit 2 Parts of the Unit Point to Revise Revision Task 1 - No revision Task 2 - No revision Task 3 - No revision Task 4 - No revision Task 5 - No revision Task 6 It is better to give illustration to add the information that is being talked about in the conversations. One relevant picture to illustrate the information in each conversation was given. Task 7 - No revision Task 8 - - Task 9 - No revision Task 10 - No revision Task 11 The word some is better replaced by word two . The word some is replaced by word two . Task 12 - No revision Task 13 - No revision Task 14 - No revision Task 15 - No revision Task 16 - No revision

c. The Result of the Expert Judgment and Revision Unit 3