Identificational articulation in statement form Identificational articulation in some non-verbal clauses

68 Subject Locative oblique Verb Wangoona irwiji anabulula. crocodile at river he pulled. ‘Crocodile, at the river, pulled.’

4.6 Prominent theme marking through identificational articulation

Identificational articulation is employed at especially thematic high points in the story. In identificational articulation, 15 the identity of an assumed referent is questioned, e.g. ‘Who ate all the candy?’ This sentence in its fuller form would be ‘Who is the one who ate all the candy?’ It is assumed that someone ate the candy; we just do not know who it is. Another form of identificational articulation would be ‘It was grandmother who ate all the candy’ Once again, it is assumed that someone ate the candy. Now the answer is identified; it was grandmother It is important to note that in identificational articulation, the normal constituent order of topic and comment is reversed, i.e. the new information is placed first in the clause, and the old information is presented last. In Fuliiru identificational articulation can be realized in several ways.

4.6.1 Identificational articulation in statement form

In some cases, information that is assumed but not identified can be expressed as ‘That is the one who... assumed information’, ‘That is the place where...assumed information’, etc. In 69 it is assumed that food is available somewhere. The question is ‘Where?’ The answer is imwabo-vyala ‘from the home of the in-laws’. The focus marker yo ‘that’s where’ is used to identify what was assumed, but not known. This sentence is thematically important, as it signals why the young man decided to obey his father-in-law. 69 Si imwabo-vyala yanaba yo yâli yeziri ibyokulya. It’s obvious at in-laws and it is that’s where they did harvest food. ‘At the in-laws place, that is where they harvested food.’ T8

4.6.2 Identificational articulation in some non-verbal clauses

The grammatical structure used to identify something that is assumed may also take the form of a non- verbal clause. In 70 the rabbit has been put in the guest house. Then in the afternoon they bring him food. He might be wondering what it is, and they identify it, saying, ‘Guest food of guests, this,’ or in other words, ‘What is here, is guest food for you.’ This is communicated by the phrase Izimaano lya’bageni, lino ‘The guest food of the guests, this’. 70 Mu kabigingwe, banabaleetera ibyokulya, banadeta “Izimaano lya bageni lino.” In afternoon they brought him food and they said Guest food of guests this ‘In the afternoon they brought him food, and they said, “This is the guest food of the guests.” ’ In 71 the young man had brought home a new wife. However, when she refused to get off his back, even when she should be making the bed or working in the field, the young man begins to wonder who she is. It is then that the old men identify for the young man what he has brought home. What he 15 At times also called focus-presupposition articulation. has unwittingly brought home is a demon. The non-verbal cl. 3 muzimu ‘demon’ is followed by the demonstrative yugwo ‘that’. In other words, ‘That thing he has brought home, is a demon.’ Besides functioning as the non-verbal predicate, yugwo functions as the relativizer for the relative phrase yugwo aleeta ‘that thing which he has brought’. 71 Muzimu yugwo aleeta. A demon that one he has brought. ‘It’s a demon, that one which he’s brought.’ 09

4.6.3 Negative focus copula