56
Table 3.3 Observation Blueprint on Oral Presentation Session
Those are the observation formats that were used for this research. The detail explanation and relation to the underlying principles are explained in Chapter II
and IV.
3.4.2 Questionnaire
In this research, questionnaire was employed as one of instruments to gain the primary data by asking questions to the respondents. Moreover, as the topic of
this research is students’ perception, asking questions would be the appropriate way to gain the primary data. The data gathering technique by using questionnaire
as the instrument was conducted to see the relation between reading and writing tasks implemented by the students, a set of activities on reading and writing
implemented in CRW 1 class, the further impact of the implementation towards their reading and writing abilities, and their perception towards the
No Aspects
Stage The underlying principles
1 Issue elaboration
Critical thinking
Identifies and summarize problem at issue, Stonewater
Wolcott 2005
2 Evidence
Investigative approach, Fairburn Winch 1996
3 Context and assumptions
Identifies other points of view, Hart 1998
4 Students’ position
Identifies own perspective and position, Stonewater
Wolcott 2005
5 Conclusion and related
outcomes Evaluation to a greater public
knowledge, Hay 1996 6
Innovative thinking 7
Connecting, synthesizing and transforming
Generate alternatives solutions Wallace and Wray 2006
57 implementation. The questionnaire employed was close-ended questions. The
reason of choosing the close-ended questions was because of the type of the questions, the analysis of the result, the focus of the questions, the analysis
effectiveness, the time limited and the amount of the respondents. There were 22 questions which were divided into three sections. The questions asked were
derived from some points in the underlying principles. The points are presented in the following.
Table 3.4 Questionnaire Blueprint
Points Stages
PartNumber The underlying
principles
Title and author Pre-reading
B1 Previewing, Pardede
2006, Skimming,
Raygor Raygor 1985, and Prediction, Smith
1994, in Pardede 2006 B2
C1
Analyze the text Critical reading
A1 Analysis and evaluation,
Fisher 2001, and Summary and analysis,
Clanchy Ballard 1991 B3
C2 C3
Evaluate the text Critical reading
A2 Analysis and evaluation,
Fisher 2001, and Evaluation, Knott n.d.
B4 B7
C4 C5
Interpret the text Critical reading
B5 Pre-critical reading,
Kurland 2010 and Analysis and evaluation,
Fisher 2001 C6
C8 C9
Summary Critical writing
B6 Summary, writing centre
university of Western Cape n.d. and
C7 Written response
Critical writing B8
Critical thinking, Fisher 2001
Synthesis the information
Critical thinking A3 B9
Reflective mind Reflective mind C10
Reflective mind, Rosales et al. 2010
58
3.4.3 Interview Guide
