The researcher focused on the implementation of anagrams and the students’ behavior towards the implementation of anagrams. In making anagrams,
the researcher tried to follow the instructions which developed by Dale and
ORourke1971. Therefore, the researcher focused on what had been good from the anagrams and what needed to be improved. Besides, the researcher also
fo cused on the students’ behavior towards the implementation of anagrams. The
purpose was to see whether the students enjoy playing anagrams or not. Besides, the purpose was also to see the participation of each student during the game.
3. Second Cycle
The researcher used the same steps with the first cycle. The researcher conducted the second cycle as the improvement of the first cycle based on the
reflection of the first cycle. The steps were the same with the first cycle. They were plan, action, observation, reflection and described as follows.
a. Plan
The researcher revised the plan which was considered unsuccessful in the first cycle. The learning material was still the same, which was Hortatory
Exposition. The researcher just continued the material which was discussed in the previous cycle. However, the researcher still had to revised some learning material
which was thought to be unsuccessful. In the second cycle, the researcher revised the rule of the games and raised the difficulty level of the anagrams. In addition,
the researcher also made new lesson plan for one meeting in the second cycle and prepared the observation instruments for the second cycle i.e.observation
checklists and field notes. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
b. Action
In this stage, the researcher implemented the revised plan which was developed based on the reflection of the first cycle. The researcher implemented
the plan on May 21
st
, 2016. The purpose of implementing the revised plan was to improve the learning actvity which was not working well in the first cycle. In the
second cycle, the researcher was still a teacher and the English teacher helped the researcher to observe the learning activity. Besides, the researcher also asked one
of the researcher’s friends to help the researcher to observe the learning activity.
The researcher still implemented the same media which was implemented in the first cycle to teach vocabulary. However, the researcher revised some rules
in the games to improve the implementation of anagrams in the second cycle. Furthermore, the researcher also added some activities beside the game to make
the students more active in the learning process.
c. Observation
During the implementation of the revised plan in the second cycle, the researcher also observed whether the plan worked well or not. The observation
was done by two observers, the English teacher of XI IPA 1 and one of the researcher’s friends. The instruments which were used in the second cycle were
the same as the first cycle. They are observation checklists and field notes. Further, the researcher added one instrument to collect the data from the
students.It was close ended questionnaire. The researcher used the questionnaire to gain the information about what the students experienced, what the students felt
towards the implementation, and what the students expected for future learning. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
d. Reflection
