Lexical Cohesion Reiteration The Cohesion of the text from
Then, the next lexical item is the lexical item of ―Chung‖. It is repeated for 6 times in 6 different sentences in the text but in all 6 sentences the lexical item of
―Chung‖ has same referent. It refers to the sort name of the Prime Minister. Then, the lexical item of ―response‖ which is repeated for twice has same referent too. It refers
to the action of the government in order to cope with the disaster. Those lexical items are the lexical items which are repeated by its same
lexical item. Then, there are 2 lexical items which are repeated by its synonym. The first lexical item is
the lexical item of ―outrage‖ which is reiterated by its synonym ―anger‖. Both lexical items share the same referent of the public’s anger especially
the family of the victims. The next lexical item which is reiterated by its synonym is ―sorrow‖ which is reiterated by ―sadness‖. Both lexical items ―sorrow‖ and ―sadness‖
have same referent of the sadness of the people due to the disaster. The last reiterated item is the lexical item of ―irresponsible‖ which is
reiterated by its near- synonym ―abrupt‖. Both lexical items refer to the opinion about
the resignation of the Prime Minister.
ii. Substitution
The borderline between the lexical cohesion and substitution is in the use of general words such as ―thing‖ in cohesive function. The general words, which
correspond to major classes of lexical items, are very commonly used with cohesive force.
Based on the analysis in the text,
The Korea Herald
uses no substitution in the text. Since substitution is a grammatical relation, a relation in the wording rather than
in the meaning,
The Korea Herald
presents the text with no substitution with general words cannot be said that it carries no implication. The fact that
The Korea Herald
uses no general words in the text implies that
The Korea Herald
wants to presents the issue with its details by using no general words but by using specific nouns and verbs
iii. Ellipsis
Ellipsis is very similar to substitution. It can be defined simply as ―substitution by zero‖. The starting point of the discussion of ellipsis can be the
familiar n otion that is „something left unsaid’ and another way of referring to ellipsis
is in fact as „something understood, where understood is used in special sense of „going without saying’.
By that definition, the analysis goes in
The Korea Herald
finds no use of ellipsis in the text. It implies that
The Korea Herald
wants the reader to understand all information clearly. So, there are no words which are omitted. Everything is clear
with its details.
iv. Conjunction
Conjunctive elements are cohesive not in themselves but indirectly, by virtue of their specific meanings. In
The Korea Herald
, there are only two conjunctions used, the conjunction „and’ and „or’. The conjunction „and’ is used for 11 times and
the conjunction „or’ is used for twice. The use of conjunction in
The Korea Herald
is only limited to the additive type. Mostly, the conjunctions used in
The Korea Herald
are only maintaining the structural relation because those conjunctions only hold within a sentence. That kind
of conjunction cannot be said to have cohesive relation because they do not hold between sentences and make the flow of the idea clear.