Data Gathering Technique Data Analysis Technique

30 to gain as much information as possible. By providing open-ended questions the researcher allowed the participants to answer the questions more openly. 4. Questionnaire According to Ary et al. 2002: 566, “a questionnaire is an instrument in which respondents provide written responses to questions or mark items that indicate their responses.” There were two types of questions provided on the questionnaire. They were close-ended and open-ended questions. The close-ended questions were used in order to ease the researcher collected the numeric data from the participants. The open-ended questions were used in order to know the participants’ perception on PBL deeper. By providing open-ended questions the participants would feel free to answer the questions. The questionnaires were given to all of the sociolinguistic class members in order to find out their understandings and their perception about the PBL implemented in their class.

E. Data Gathering Technique

The data of this research were gathered by distributing the questionnaire and conducting the interview. Both of the research instruments were conducted after the researcher had the permission from the Chairperson of English Language Education Sanata Dharma University. The observation and interview session with the lecturer was conducted to answer the first problem formulation about how the project based learning was implemented in Sociolinguistics class. The questionnaire and personal interview to the students of Sociolinguistics class was conducted to answer the second 31 problem formulation about the students’ perceptions on the project based learning implemented in their class.

F. Data Analysis Technique

In order to answer the problems the researcher analyzed the data gathered using quantitative and qualitative methods. First, the researcher classified the same answer of each research statement. The following step was calculating the percentage of each research statement. The result of the calculation was put into the table and discussed based on four categories in the blueprint of the questionnaires. The questions provided on the questionnaires were based on some experts’ theories. Gibson 1985 states there are 4 stages of building perception which are observation, influence, evaluation and interpretation and response. Therefore, I construct this questionnaire according to Gibson’s theory. However, in constructing this questionnaire there are also the supporting theories that make this questionnaire more scientific. This questionnaire is supported by the theories of Altman, Valenzi, Hodgetts 1985 about aspects in human perceptual process which determine people’s attitudes p.95. They are affection aspect emotion, cognition aspect belief, knowledge, observation, and thought, and conation aspect attitude, behavior, activity, and motivation. Gibson 1985:64 about the factors affecting person in forming perception which are stereotype, selectivity, self-concept, situation, needs, and emotion are also used as supporting theories of this questionnaires. The following is the blueprint of the questionnaires. 32 1. Observation Observation is how the students observe the stimuli. It is the stage when the students consider whether the stimuli, in this case is PBL, fits their selectivity, need, self-concept, expectation, and way of thinking. Table 3.1. The Blueprint of the Questionnaire Observation No. Observation Expert Theories 1. Gibson 1985 To find out whether their selectivity 2. To find out whether the students need PROJECT WORK 3. To find out the students’ self concept and what the students feel in undergoing PROJECT WORK 4 5. To find out the students’ expectation, way of thinking and the situation they face 6. Altman, Valenzi, Hodgetts 1985 To find out the student’ motivation 2. Influence This stage marks in what extend the stimuli PBL influence the students’ skills and abilities. Table 3.2. The Blueprint of the Questionnaire Influence of PBL Influence No. Expert Theories 7. Gibson 1985; Baron 1998; Barrow Milburn 1990; Blumfeld et al. 1991; Breault Breault 2005; Dewey 1924 To find out whether PROJECT WORK promote in-depth learning of subject matter 8. To find out whether PROJECT WORK develop the students’ problem solving skill 33 Influence No. Expert Theories 9. Mergendoller 1999 To find out whether PROJECT WORK develop the students’ communication skill 10. Beckett 2005; Kobayashi 2004 To find out whether PROJECT WORK develop the students’ critical thinking skill 11. Mergendoller 1999 To find out whether PROJECT WORK improves student’s learning styles which trigger the unmotivated students to be more active in learning 12. Gibson 1985; Baron 1998; Barrow Milburn 1990; Blumfeld et al. 1991; Breault Breault 2005; Dewey 1924 To find out whether PROJECT WORK develop the students’ decision-making skill 13. Guo 2006 To find out if PROJECT WORK makes a natural learning for the students based on their daily life context 3. Evaluation and Interpretation This is the stage where he students evaluate and interpret the stimuli they have processed on the previous two stages. Table 3.3. The Blueprint of the Questionnaire Evaluation and Interpretation Evaluation and Interpretation No. Expert Theories 14. Guo Y 2006 To find out if the products of PROJECT WORK is the outcome of their personal experience 15. Mergendoller Michaelson 1999 To find out if PROJECT WORK lets the students having a dept –exploration investigation toward an issue or authentic topic 16. To find out if PROJECT WORK accustom the students to technology 34 Evaluation and Interpretation No. Expert Theories 17. Mergendoller Michaelson 1999 To find out if PROJECT WORK accustom the students to self –learning and self-management 18. To find out if PROJECT WORK accustom the students to a project-management 19. Mergendoller Michaelson 1999 To find out whether PROJECT WORK allows the students learn from their experience 20. To find out whether PROJECT WORK encourage the students’ cooperative working skill 21. To find out whether PBL is less-burdening than individual work 22. To find out whether the students prefer to deal with PBL or individual work 4. Response Response is the stage in which the students take actions toward the stimuli PBL. Table 3.4. The Blueprint of the Questionnaire Response Response No. Expert Theories 23. Gibson 1985 and Altman, Valenzi, Hodgetts 1985 To find out the students’ activeness toward sociolinguistic class 24. 25. 26. To find out the students’ behavior toward sociolinguistic class 27. 28. To find out the students’ motivation in sociolinguistic class 29. 35

G. Research procedure