The Average Scores of the Experimental and the Control Group

The following formula was used to get the means: In which, Mx : the mean of the experimental group x  : the sum of all scores of the experimental group My : the mean of the control group y  : the sum of all scores of the control group N : the number of the subject sample a. the mean of the pretest of the experimental group = 1538 30 = 51.2667 b. the mean of the pretest of the control group = 1732 30 = 64 c. the mean of the posttest of the experimental group = 2282 30 = 76.0667 d. the mean of the posttest of the control group y = 2108 30 N x Mx   N y My   = 70.2667 Based on the computation above, the difference average score between the experimental group and the control group was appeared. On the experimental group, the average score of the pretest was 51.2667 and the posttest was 76.0667. From those scores, the difference of the average score between the pretest and the posttest on the experimental group was 24.8. While, on the control group, the average score of the pretest was 64 and the posttest was 70.2667. The difference average of the score between those tests was 6.2667. It means that the difference average score on the experimental group was higher than in the control group. In conclusion, there was good improvement of the experimental group’s achievement after they received the treatment by using semantic mapping strategy in teaching reading comprehension of narrative text.

4.7 T-Test Statistical Analysis

This sub-chapter would be discussed the T-Test of posttest and gain difference of experimental and control groups.

4.7.1 T-Test of Post-test of Experimental and Control Group.

From the known data, then we calculated the result of posttest from the experimental and control group as follows: = − 1 + − 1 + − 2 = 30 − 134.9655 + 30 − 1 79.8889 30 + 30 − 2 = 7.578074 And to find the t-value, I used the formula t = X − X S 1 n + 1 n t = 77.00 − 70.27 7.578074 1 30 + 1 30 t = 3.440 The value of the t-table with dk = 30+30 - 2 = 58 and significance level α=5 was 2.00. As the value 3.440 2.00, it could be concluded that there was significant difference on posttest between experimental and control groups. see appendix 15

4.7.2 T-T for Reading Achievement’s Gain Difference

The result of the t-test became the quantitative proof whether the difference of the pretest and posttest means of both group was significant or not. From the known data, then we could calculate the gain of pretest and posttest from the experimental and control group was as follows: = − 1 + − 1 + − 2 = 30 − 153.4000 + 30 − 1 75.5678 30 + 30 − 2 = 8.03019 And to find the t-value, I used the formula

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effectiveness of Using Mind Mapping in Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text A Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Grade of SMA Mathla’ul Huda Parung Panjang-Bogor.

0 5 126

The Effectiveness Of Using Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) On Students' Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text" (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade ofSMA Mathia 'ul Huda Parung PanjangBogor in Academic Year of 201412015),

4 36 111

The Effectiveness of Story Mapping Technique toward Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text

0 9 138

The Use of Directed Reading Teaching Activity in teaching Narrative Text Reading– A Case of Eighth Graders Students of SMP Negeri 19 Semarang

0 4 110

The Effect of Video Game towards Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text; (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students' of SMP Negeri 96 Jakarta in the Academic Year of 2015/2016)

1 28 129

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SUGGESTOPEDIA IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT.

6 30 32

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MIND MAPPING STRATEGY IN TEACHING THE STUDENTS TO WRITE DESCRIPTIVE TEXT (An Experiment of the Eighth Grade Students of SMP N I Pegandon Kendal in the Academic Year of 2008/ 2009).

0 2 77

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PICTURE SERIES IN TEACHING WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT OF EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 1 NGANTRU IN THE ACADEMICYEAR 20142015

0 0 15

THE ABILITY OF THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 2 SUKOLILO PATI IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 20122013 IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT TAUGHT BY USING SEMANTIC MAPPING STRATEGY By ABDUL WAHID

0 0 19

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF “THE POWER OF TWO” STRATEGY IN STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION IN NARRATIVE TEXT - repository perpustakaan

1 1 6