10
students. This research is different with the previous research. This research is focused on simple present, past, and future tense.
Based on the theory of Selinker, Smith, and Saville the finding of this research is
that the students’ errors are caused by the limitation of Linguistic competence,
psychologist and sociologist. The finding shows that the second grade of MA MA’ARIF
CEPOGO make some errors with systematicaly. The researcher found 32 datas in
student’s
product with systematicaly and the highest is the use of V1 in past tense with
percentage
86.
Based on the analyses of Interlanguage of composition written by second
grade of MA MA’ARIF Cepogo in previous chapter, the result of the research can be
concluded as follows:
1. Related to the types of Interlanguage
After discussing the content of each chapters the writer concludes those
students still commit of systematicity in constructing sentences. Based on the data
analyzes, the writer finds 32 types of systematicities of interlanguage. The
representative of simple present tense is present tense, present continuous tense,
perfect tense, and the negation of present tense. There are 5 kinds systematicity in
present tense. They are the use of V‐ing, the use of ‘Vs es’ for first person singular
and plural, the use of V1 for the third person singular, the use of ‘is’ for all pronouns,
the omission of “to be” for un‐verbal sentence. There are 4 kinds systematicity of
present continuous tense. They are the use of ‘BE’ V1, the use BE is Ving for first
person singular and plural, the use of V1, the use Ving without BE. There are 3 kinds
systematicity of present prefect tense. They are the use of BE has have ‐ V3, the use
11
of havehas –V1, the use of have –V3 for third singular person. There are 4 kinds
systematicity of negation present tense. They are the use of BE +do or does+not+ V1,
the use of do+V1 for the third singular person, the use of do or does not +Ving, the
use of not without dodoes.
The represents of simple past tense are past tense, past continuous tense,
past perfect tense, and the negation of past tense. There are 3 kinds systematicities
in past tense. They are the use of V1, the use of ‘ED’ for irregular verb, the use of ‘BE’
V2. There are 3 kinds systematicities in past continuous tense. They are the use BE
is, am, are Ving, the use of BE was for plural person, the use Ving without BE.
There 3 kinds of systematicies in past perfect continuous. They are the use of BE had
+ Ving, the use of havehas –for past perfect tense, the use of had + V1. There are 3
kinds of systematicity in negation past tense. They are the use of BE + did +not V1,
the use of did +Ving, the use not without did. The representative of simple future
tense is future tense. There are four kinds of systematicities in future tense. They are
the use ‘BE’ + WILL + V1, the use of will + Ving, the use of going to without BE, the
use of past progressive instead of future tense.
Based on the frequency of systematicities above the writer concludes that
the dominant type of systematicities is the use V1 in past tense with percentage
86. It proves that students are lack of grammatical competence.
After analyzing each types of systematicities, the writer finds the errors
because the linguistic competence and linguistic performance, psychologists and
psycholinguists, sociolinguist, and social psychologists.
