commit to user
1
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study
Speaking is one of the four skills that need to be mastered by everyone because by speaking, one is able to convey meaning, express feeling, give
opinion, etc. According to Thornburry 2005:  8 speaking is a speech production that becomes a part of daily activities which involves interaction.  It means that if
one is able to communicate well she or he will be able to interact with the society, go to many places without having any obstacles, work in any work field because
speaking is of key to pass the interview test, etc. Furthermore, O’Malley and Pierce 1996: 11 state that speaking seems to
be an important skill that a learner should acquire. They add that speaking skill is very important to enable students to communicate effectively through oral
language, because disability of the students to speak may result in the inability to express their ideas even in a simple form conversation. In line with O’Malley,
Pierce and Kayi 2006: 1 state that the teaching of speaking is very important part of second language learning because it is clearly and efficiently contributes to the
success of the learners in school and success in their life. Thus, it is essential that language teachers pay great attention to the teaching of speaking. Since speaking
is very important the government emphasizes speaking to be taught at school. Based on Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan nasional Tahun 2006. No.23 the
objectives of teaching speaking for senior high School is in order that the students are  able  to  express  meaning  orally  in  interpersonal  and  transactional,  formal  and
commit to user 2
informal in form of recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news items, report, analytical  exposition,  hortatory  exposition,  spoof,  explanation,  discussion,  and
review in daily life. It is hoped that the students are able to speak and tell a story in English, to produce the English speech sound, to select appropriate words and
sentences according to social setting, to organize their thoughts in meaningful and logical  sequence,  to  use  the  language  quickly  and  confidently  However,  the  fact
shows that many students are not able to show their speaking ability. In the classroom during the teaching and learning process the students are
passive,  they  just  listen  to  the  teacher  explaining  the  material  without understanding  the  meaning  and  they  just  keep  silent  without  any  response  when
the teacher asked them questions or when their friends were having conversation. Bisedes  that,  they  can  hardly  use  English  for  communication  even  in  the  simple
form, they always use their mother tongue for communication. They are not able to  produce  English  word  correctly  and    arrange  English  sentence  even  in  simple
sentence that make them cannot produce the language correctly, etc. This fact can be proved by looking at percentage of students using English
well  in  telling  their  daily  activities  was  only  29  from  31  the  total  number  of students at SMAN 1 Sakra in 20102011 academic year. The researcher found that
there were only 9 students who got mark more than minimum standard 6.3 and there  were  22  students  who  got  under  minimum  standard.  The  average  score  is
53.41  the  highest  is  72  and  the  lowest  one  is  34.  They  often  mispronounced certain  words,  often  misunderstood  with  the  hoped  answer,  did  not  have  well
structure,  and  did  not  have  fluent  expressions  as well.  It  can  be  recognized  from
commit to user 3
the  average  score  of  the  students  in  content,  organization,  grammar, pronunciation,  and  fluency  which  were  low  as  shown  in  table  1.  Those  low
speaking aspects automatically affect the students’ speaking ability. Table 1: The Average Score of Speaking Aspects
No Aspect
Average score
Percentage Maximum
score 1
Content 2.98
60 5
2 Organization
2.95 59
5 3
Grammar 2.59
52 5
4 Pronunciation
2.32 46
5 5
Fluency 2.5
50 5
Total 13.34
53 25
Based on the result above, it is true that students’ speaking skill in SMAN 1  Sakra  is  still  considered  as  the  most  difficult  skill  because  the  skill  contains  a
complex  substance  such  as  pronunciation,  structure,  discourse,  and  the  social context  of  culture  and  situation.  Those  problems  may  come  from  the  students
itself and from the outside of the students. The factor that come from the students cause  the  students  have  low  speaking  ability  are  passive,  less  motivated,  less
confident,  nervous,  shy,  afraid  of  making  mistake,  and  afraid  of  being  laugh  by friend.
From  the  result  of  interview,  the  researcher  obtained  the  data.  When researcher  asked  them  about  their  difficulties,  a  student  with  data  source  S10
admitted that: “Saya kurang aktif mengikuti pelajaran speaking dikelas karna kurang
mengerti apa yang disampaikan oleh guru, sebab kosa kata saya sangat kurang, lagi pula cara melafalkan kata-kata sagat sulit, apa lagi kalau di
commit to user 4
suruh ke depan menyampaikan ungkapan atau pendapat yang berhubung dengan topic sangat lah sulit dan takut salah, lagi pula kurang berlatih
disekolah maupun dirumah”. Friday, 20 February 2011.
From the data above, it is indentified that the student with the data source S10 is less understand because of lack vocabulary, difficult to pronounce English
words, afraid of making mistake and rarely practice at school or at home. Similar  problems  -  less  confident,  afraid  of  making  mistake  and  miss
understand,  nervous,  and  has  poor  vocabulary  are  also  faced  by  student  with  the data source S15. She wants to have speaking activity in a team because it will be
more comfortable and the students will be able to help each other as the researcher quoted below;
“Setiap saya maju kedepan, saya kurang percaya diri, saya merasa takut salah berbicara dalam Bahasa Inggris, gemetaran dan sangat kaku, untuk
menghadapi semua ini saya lebih suka belajar berkelompok atau tim, untuk menghilangkan rasa malu”.  Friday, 20 February 2011.
Furthermore,  students’  learning  outcome  which  is  still  considered unsuccessful,  has  always  been  the  focus  of  criticism  towards  the  failure  of
teaching  of  English  in  SMAN  1  Sakra.  As  a  consequence  English  teachers  are demanded to be responsible for the failure in making the students capable of using
English  for  communication  both  productively  and  receptively.  To  alleviate  this ordeal,  educators,  practitioners,  and  policy  makers  quite  often  pay  very  much
attention  to  research  dealing  with  the  curriculum,  methodology,  and  teachers excluding  such  significant  variables  as  the  learner  perspective.  They  have  rarely
considered the learner perspective as a very important contribution to the learning process.
commit to user 5
Pertaining  to  the  students’  problems  being  faced,  there  are  many  factors causing their difficulties in achieving speaking competence, based on the result of
interview that the researcher got from the teacher informally, the causes are stated specifically as follows.
Firstly  in  teaching  speaking,  the  teacher  tended  to  teach  text comprehension  monotonously.  For  example,  when  the  teacher  taught  a  certain
topic,  he  or  she  just  explained  the  expressions  related  to  the  topic  while  the students  listened  to  the  teacher’s  explanation,  and  took  notes,  or  even  for
sometimes took a nap. Then, shehe asked the students to look at the structure of the  dialogue  which  had  been  stated  in  the  book  to  read  together  after  her.  After
that  shehe  asked  some  of  them  to  practice  the  dialogue  in  front  of  the  class  in pairs. Shehe asked them to answer the comprehensive questions dealing with the
topic in written. The teacher would feel satisfied if the students could answer the questions correctly. The weaknesses of what the teacher did were as follows; the
students  did  not  have  more  enough  rehearsal  time  to  practice  or  to  express  their own  ideas  so  that  they  could  not  interact  one  to  each  other  in  English
simultaneously. They also tended to be shy, nervous, doubt, inferior, and afraid to make mistakes because they seldom used their own English to communicate with
others. Besides, they did not have creative and innovative activity. Secondly,  the  teacher  oriented  herhis  teaching  at  the  written  test  which
was  held  in  the  mid  or  end  semester,  even  in  the  final  exam.  The  teacher  felt guilty  if  the  students  could  not  do  the  test  correctly,  because  their  English  mark
automatically would be bad or less than standard score.
commit to user 6
Thirdly,  there  was  no  specially  allocated  time  to  evaluate  the  students’ speaking skill at the end of semester or final exam. This caused the teacher tend to
ignore  the  teaching  of  speaking  communicatively.  The  marks  of  speaking  skill were taken from the teacher’s daily observation.
Fourthly,  the  teacher  still  taught  the  students  with  routine  activities without realizing that it would make the students bored and lost their attention to
the teaching learning process. As a result, the students were not able to catch the material easily because of their lost interest and participation. This is in line with
statement  of  Douglas  in  Suharno  2006:  6”Routine  activities  in  learning  can make the students bored. As result, their motivation and participation in learning
will decrease”. Moreover,  recognizing  students’  problems  in  learning  English  especially
in  speaking  skill,  Ur  1996:  121  states  some  problems  that  may  prohibit  the students  to  develop  their  speaking  skill.  First,  students  have  low  motivation  in
learning since English is not used all the time in classroom or at school or in their environment  outside  the school.  Unfortunately,  English  is  a  foreign  language  for
the  students.  Second,  students  are  lack  of  prior  knowledge  especially  deals  with vocabulary and grammar of the language. Third, students are lack of ideas, having
low  participation  and  only  using  their  mother  tongue  to  talk  in  the  classroom. Fourth,  the  teacher  is  not  able  to  manage  the  classroom  since  he  or  she  is  not
familiar  with  various  methods  in  teaching  speaking  skill.  Fifth,  teacher  does  not speak  in  English  when  giving  instructions  since  most  of  the  students  do  not
comprehend the teachers` point if learning is done in English. Finally, students are
commit to user 7
not facilitated by the school. School does not have sufficient source of material for learning  to  speak.  Based  on  the  problems  and  the  causes  above,  the  researcher
proposes Critical Debate Techique as a solution to develop the speaking ability of the second year students of SMAN 1 Sakra.
According to Barkley,  et al. 2005: 4 collaborative learning is the process of students in which they work in pairs or small groups to achieve shared learning
goals. In further explanation they say clearly: “To
collaborate
is  to  work  with  another  or  others.  In  practice, collaborative learning has come to mean students working in pairs or small
groups  to  achieve  shared  goals.  It  is  learning  through  group  work  rather than  learning  by  working  alone.  There  are  other  terms  for  this  kind  of
activity,  such  as
cooperative learning,  team  learning,  group  learning,  or
peer-assisted  learning
.  In  this  case,  however,  we  use  the  phrase
collaborative learning
to refer to learning activities expressly designed for and carried out through pairs or small interactive groups”.
By applying Critical Debate Technique, students are able to increase their motivation,  enhance  their  skill,  promote  critical  thinking,  and  develop
communication proficiency. Besides, the debates expose the class to a focused, in- depth,  multiple-perspective  analysis  of  issues.  Because  critical  debates  have  the
added dimension of requiring students to assume a position opposite to their own, they  encourage  students  to  challenge  their  existing  assumptions.  This  can  move
students beyond simple dualistic thinking, deepen their understanding of an issue, and help them to recognize the range of perspective inherent in complex topics. In
this  way,  critical  debate  may  also  build  appreciation  for  diversity  and  develop tolerance for other viewpoints.
commit to user 8
Critical  Debate  Technique  has  great  contribution  in  speaking  since  it  is  a task-based.  It  encourages  the  students  to  practice  their  English  in  real
communication. By using Critical Debate Technique, it can activate the students’ speaking  class,  improve  the  students’  achievement-speaking  ability  such  as  to
produce the English speech sounds and sound pattern, to select appropriate words and sentences according to the proper social setting, to organize their thoughts in
meaningful and logical sequence, to use the language quickly and cofidently with few  unnatural  pauses  which  are  called  as  fluency  and  to  overcome  the  problem
face in learning teaching process.
B. Problem Formulation