Teerajetgul et al., 2008 Knowledge Conversion Techniques

58 Table 2.3. Techniques for capturingconverting tacit knowledge No. Technique Researchers Description Technique to Capture Technique to Convert Form of Explicit Output 1 Observation Liou, 1992 ,Maiden et al., 1996, Woo et al., 2004, Hadikusumo et al., 2004, Awad et al.,

2007, Teerajetgul et al., 2008

Process which involves observing, recording, and interpreting the experts problem-solving 1. Observing, 2. Recording, 3. Interpreting Interpreting Records Records 2 Brainstorming Liou, 1992, Maiden et al., 1996, Neve, 2003, Hari et al., 2005, Awad et al., 2007 An unstructured, consensus-based approach to generating ideas about a problem which is suitable for multiple experts. All possible solutions considered equally and emphasis is on the frequency of responses during the session. Concluding will be by idea evaluation 1. Presenting the problem, 2. Generating ideas by experts, 3. Evaluating ideas Choosing convergence ideas ideas, likes and dislikes as text streams 3 Protocol Analysis Wright et al., 1987, Liou, 1992, Maiden et al. 1996, Bollojuet al., 2002, Awad et al., 2007 Think-aloud approach 1. Verbalizing problem solution 2. Collecting and analyzing Protocols, 3. Structuring of elicited information Structuring elicited information from knowledge developers Protocol to solve a problem 59 Table 2.3. Techniques for capturingconverting tacit knowledge-Continue No. Technique Researchers Description Technique to Capture Technique to Convert Form of Explicit Output 4 Consensus Decision Making Liou, 1992, Herrera et al., 1996, Balasubramanian et al., 1999, Giordanoet al., 2007, Awad et al., 2007. Experts are asked to vote on the alternate solutions they generated. Procedure should ensure fairness and standardization in the way experts arrive at a consensus 1. Present the problem, 2. Generating ideas, 3. Voting on the alternate solutions Voting on alternate solutions Consensus about solutions 5 Repertory Grid Stewart et al., 1981, Boose, 1989, Shema et al., 1990, Liou, 1992, Bradshaw et al., 1993, Moynihan, 2002, Neve, 2003, Awad et al., 2007. Because of complexity and manageability, the tool is normally used in the early stages of knowledge capture. 1. Conceptualizing problem using a model, 2. Using a grid to facilitate capture and evaluation of models, 3. Representing experts’ reasoning about problem Using a reasoning grid A grid of entities and attributes filled by values 6 Nominal Group Technique Liou, 1992, Anderson et al., 1997, Potter et al., 2004, Hari et al., 2005, Awad et al.,

2007. An idea writing technique to provide a