Lakshminarasimhan 3 , Prakash Diwakar 4

P. Lakshminarasimhan 3 , Prakash Diwakar 4

& Sachin Punekar 5,6

1 Art, Commerce and Science College, Lanja, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra 416701, India

2 Department of Botany, University of Pune, Pune, Maharashtra 411007, India

3 Central National Herbarium, Botanical Survey of India, P.O. Botanic Garden, Howrah, West Bengal 711103, India

4 Botanical Survey of India, Western Regional Centre, 7, Koregaon Road, Pune, Maharashtra 411001, India

5 Paleobiology Group, Agharkar Research Institute, G.G. Agarkar Road, Pune, Maharashtra 411004, India

6 Biospheres, Eshwari, 52/403, Lakshminagar, Parvati, Pune, Maharashtra 411009, India

Email: 1 [email protected] (corresponding author),

2 [email protected], 3 [email protected],

4 [email protected], 5 [email protected],

6 [email protected]

OPEN ACCESS | FREE DOWNLOAD

Date of publication (online): 26 June 2012 Date of publication (print): 26 June 2012 ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print)

Editor: N.P. Balakrishnan

Manuscript details:

Ms # o2444 Received 19 April 2010 Final received 06 April 2012 Finally accepted 14 May 2012

Citation: Kavade, S., S. Deokule, P. Lakshminarasimhan, P. Diwakar & S. Punekar (2012). Belosynapsis vivipara (Dalzell) C.E.C. Fisch. (Commelinaceae), a vulnerable spiderwort, rediscovered after sixteen decades from Maharashtra, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4(6): 2660–2663.

Copyright: © Shrinath Kavade, Subhash Deokule, P. Lakshminarasimhan, Prakash Diwakar & Sachin Punekar 2012. Creative Commons Attribution

3.0 Unported License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium for non-profit purposes, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication.

Acknowledgements: We thank Dr. V.R. Gunale, Head, Department of Botany, University of Pune, Dr. S.R. Bhosale, Principal, ACS College, Lanja and Directors of Agarkar Research Institute, Pune and Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata for facilities. Thanks are also due to Maharashtra Forest Department during the fieldwork in Chandoli National Park. Help rendered by Dr. V.P. Prasad, Indian Liaison Officer, Royal Botanic Garden, Kew, London by sending the type image is gratefully acknowledged.

Chandoli National Park (previously Chandoli Wildlife Sanctuary) is a part of recently declared Sahyadri Tiger Reserve situated in the heart of

the northern Western Ghats of Maharashtra, ear-marked as a future UNESCO World Heritage site. The study area spreads over

an area of 317.67km 2 along the backwaters of Varana River across the Sahyadri range. Chandoli National Park (CNP) lies between 17 0 3’29”–17 0 17’00”N and

73 0 41’55”–73 0 51’55”E. The altitude ranges from 589 to 1044 m. During a study to assess the floristic diversity of CNP, we collected and identified Belosynapsis

vivipara (Dalzell) C.E.C Fisch. after a lapse of 160 years from Maharashtra. The genus Belosynapsis Hassk. is represented by five species distributed from South Asia to New Guinea (e-Floras, Digital Flora

of Taiwan 2009). In India, it is represented by three species, namely, B. epiphytica (Blatt.) C.E.C. Fisch., B. kewensis Hassk. and B. vivipara (Dalzell) C.E.C. Fisch.

(Karthikeyan et al. 1989). After Dalzell’s collection in 1851 from Parva Ghat (Fig. 1), Maharashtra (at the junction of Maharashtra, Goa and Karnataka State), this species could not be collected from any other place in Maharashtra and it is treated as nearly vanished from the state (Lakshminarasimhan 1996; Mishra & Singh 2001). Apart from Maharashtra, this endemic (Ahmedullah & Nayar 1986) species is distributed in Karnataka (Katlekan, Jog Falls, Yedur, Agumbe, Shimoga, Hulical-Hosgadda, Shirur Ghat, Talacavery) (Sundararaghavan 1970), Kerala (Wayaaad) (Sharma et al. 1984) and Tamil Nadu (Anamalai Hills) (Gamble 1931). In the present investigation, a total of about 100 individuals were seen growing as epiphytes on large tree trunks at about 1.52–3.04 m from the ground in the riparian forest patches of Male and Patharpunj villages in Chandoli National Park, which in fact forms the northernmost distribution of this vulnerable taxon (Kammathy 1987).

Materials and Methods: The present work is based on intensive floristic survey of CNP in the period 2005 to 2010. During the field study four specimens of

this species were collected and plant specimens were identified using Gamble (1967), Sundararaghavan,

(1970), Kammathy (1987), Lakshminarasimhan (1996) and deposited in the herbarium of the Department of Botany, University of Pune and Herbarium of Botanical Survey of India, Western Regional Centre, Pune (BSI) with collection number SPK 645.

A detailed description, ecological observations,

Belosynapsis vivipara rediscovered S. Kavade et al.

Figure 1. Distribution map of Belosynapsis vivipara showing the type locality (Parva Ghat) and Chandoli National Park.

photographs (Image 1a-c) and distribution map (Fig. leaves 1–2 x 0.2–0.5 cm, sessile, ovate or elliptic, apex

1) of the species are provided for easy identification. acute, pilose. Scape 8–25 cm long, slender, viviparous at the apex with several small oblong-lanceolate acute

Belosynapsis vivipara (dalzell) sprague ex c.e.c.

leaves. Peduncle with 2–4 flowers in umbel, arising

from the leaf axils, pilose, 2-bracteate. Sepals 3, 2–3 in Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew 1928: 254. 1928 &

Fisch.

mm long, oblong, villous. Petals 3, white, connate to in Gamble, Fl. Madras 1551. 1931 [3: 1082. 1967

the middle. Stamens 6; filaments naked. Capsules (Repr.)]; Kammathy in M.P. Nayar & Sastry (eds.),

oblanceolate, ca. 3mm long, obtuse, hairy, recurved Red Data Book Indian Pl. 1: 124, f. 1987; Karthik. et

after dehiscence, 3-celled, 2-seeded. Seeds cylindric, al., Fl. Ind. Enum. Monocot. 24. 1989; Lakshmin. in B.

smooth.

D. Sharma et al., Fl. Maharashtra State, Monocot. 147. Specimens examined: 1851, Parva Ghat, 1996; D.K. Mishra & N.P. Singh, Endemic & Threat.

Maharashtra, India, coll. Dalzell, s.n. (K), 30.xi.1961, Fl. Pl. Maharashtra 241. 2001. Cyanotis vivipara

Katlekan, on way to Gerusoppa from Jog, coll. Ansari Dalzell in Hooker’s J. Bot. Kew. Gard. Misc. 3: 226.

and Kammathy, 78707; 04.x.1962, Yedur, Shimoga 1851; Hook. f., Fl. Brit. India 6: 388. 1892; T. Cooke,

District, coll. Raghavan, 82972; 08.x.1962, Hulical, Fl. Bombay 3: 305. 1967 (Repr.).

Shimoga District, coll. Raghavan, 83069; 09.x.1962, Epiphytic, subscapigerous herbs, 10–25 cm long,

same locality, coll. Raghavan, 83088 A; 16.x.1962, covered with scattered rufous spreading hairs or

Agumbe, Shimoga District, coll. Raghavan, 83267; glabrescent in the tender plants; rootstock small.

24.viii.1963, Hulical-Hosgadda area, Shimoga Leaves radical and cauline; radical leaves 3–8 x 1–2 cm,

District, coll. Raghavan, 9196; 01.ix.1963, Shirur sessile, linear or linear-lanceolate, base narrowed, apex

Ghat, Shimoga District, coll. Raghavan, 90372 A; acute or acuminate, covered with pilose hairs; cauline

23.x.1963, Bhimanagundi, Coorg District, coll. A.S.

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | June 2012 | 4(6): 2660–2663

Belosynapsis vivipara rediscovered S. Kavade et al.

© Shrinath Kavade

© Shrinath Kavade © Shrinath Kavade

Image 1. Belosynapsis vivipara (Dalzell) C.E.C. Fisch. a - Habitat; b - Vegetative habit; c - Reproductive habit

Rao, 95014; 26.x.1963, Talacauvery, Coorg District, (Wayanad) and Tamil Nadu (Anamalai Hills). coll. A.S. Rao, 95144 (All in BSI); 21.vii.2007,

Ecology: Growing at an elevation of ca. 992m Chandoli National Park, Sangali District, SPK 645 (17 0 16’22.79”N & 73 0 45’15.20”E) as an epiphyte (Department of Botany, University of Pune; BSI) on densely moss covered tree trunks and branches (Image 2).

of Flacourtia montana, Memecylon umbellatum and Flowering & Fruiting: July–October.

Syzygium cumini in shady, semi-evergreen riparian Distribution: Endemic to Western Ghats. forests (Image 1a) in association with Begonia Maharashtra (Sangali); Karnataka (Chikmagalur, crenata, Bryum sp., Hoya wightii, Hymenophyllum sp., Coorg, Hassan, Mysore, N. Kanara, Shimoga), Kerala Lycopodium hamiltonii, Pogonatum sp. and Remusatia

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | June 2012 | 4(6): 2660–2663

Belosynapsis vivipara rediscovered S. Kavade et al.

vivipara.

We suggest that total protection should be given to the riparian forests areas of Chandoli National Park for the conservation of this vulnerable and endemic taxon. Ex situ conservation and domestication of this species in greenhouses and gardens for future survival, besides its re-introduction into the wild in similar habitats is the need of the hour.

reFerences

ahmedullah., M. & M.P. nayar (1986). Endemic Plants of Indian Region—Vol. 1. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, p.208.

digital Flora of taiwan (2009). <http://www.efloras.org> Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO & Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA. Online version dated

26 September 2009. Gamble, J.s. (1931). The Flora of the Presidency of Madras— Pt. IX. Adlard and Son Ltd. London, p.1551. [3: 1082. 1967 (Repr.)].

Kammathy, r.V. (1987). Belosynapsis vivipara (Dalz.) Sprague et Fischer, p.123, f. on p.124. In: Nayar, M.P. & A.R.K. Sastry (eds.). Red Data Book of Indian Plants—Vol.

1. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta.

Karthikeyan, s., s.K. Jain, M.P. nayar & M. sanjappa

(1989). Florae Indicae Enumeratio: Monocotyledonae, Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, p.24.

lakshminarasimhan, P. (1996). Monocotyledones, p. 147. In: Sharma, B.D., S. Karthikeyan & N.P. Singh (eds.). Flora of Maharashtra State. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta.

Mishra, d.K. & n.P. singh (2001). Endemic and Threatened Flowering Plants of Maharashtra. Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata, p.241.

sharma, B.d., n.P. singh., r. sundararaghavan & u.r.

deshpande (1984). Flora of Karnataka Analysis. Botanical Survey India, Calcutta, p.288.

Image 2. Herbarium of Belosynapsis vivipara

sundararaghavan, r. (1970). The Flora of Agumbe and Tirthahalli areas in Shimoga District, Mysore State. PhD Thesis. Madras University, Madras. (Unpublished)

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | June 2012 | 4(6): 2660–2663

JoTT n OTE 4(6): 2664–2666

New distributional record of a rare

While revising the genus

sedge Kobresia (Cyperaceae) from

Kobresia Willd. (Cyperaceae)

Sikkim, India

in India under ‘Flora of India Project’ of the Botanical Survey

Bikash Jana 1 , R.C.Srivastava 2 , D.G. Long 3 &

of India, the authors came across specimens in the G.P. Sinha 4 BSHC herbarium, which on critical studies were

identified as K. harae Rajbh. & H. Ohba. A scrutiny

1,2 Botanical Survey of India, CGO Complex, DF Block, 5 th Floor,

Sector I, Saltlake, Kolkata, West Bengal 700064, India

of the literature (Clarke 1894; Karthikeyan et al.

3 Herbarium, Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburg | Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, Scotland, UK

1989; Kuekenthal 1909; Koyama 1978; Noltie 1994;

4 Botanical Survey of India, Central Regional Centre,

Noltie & Zhang 2010) and herbaria revealed that this

10 Chatham Lines, Allahahabd, Uttar Pradesh 211002, India Email: 2 [email protected] (corresponding author),

species is known so far from Nepal only. Therefore,

4 [email protected]

the present collection from northern Sikkim forms the first report for India.

Kobresia, a genus established by Willdenow in

Kobresia harae rajbh. & h. ohba

1805, is placed in the tribe Cariceae under the subfamily in J. Jap. Bot. 62(7): 193, f.1. 1987. Cyperioideae of the sedge family Cyperaceae. The

(Image 1) genus is characterized by its utricles, which are more

Type: Nepal: Janakpur Zone, Ramechhap District, or less open on one side and in having at least some Serdingma-Dubikharka, 3400–3720 m, 7.vii.1985, bisexual spikelets with male flowers above the female Ohba et al. No.8570278 Holotype (TI) flowers. There are about 65 species (Govaerts et al.

13.vii.1996, 3520m, 2007) distributed in the northern hemisphere, especially Yumthang, North Sikkim District, Sikkim, India, coll. at high altitudes in the Himalaya, India, China and G.P. Sinha & D.G. Long, 17821 (BSHC) (Image 2). central Asia. About 42 taxa are recorded so far from

Specimen

examined:

Perennial herbs. Rhizome elongated, ca. 4 x 0.3 cm India. It is one of the important genera in the alpine covered with brownish-black scales. Culms slender, flora of the eastern and western Himalayan region of erect, 9.5–10.1 cm x 0.5mm, triquetrous, smooth; base India. It is also an important pasture plant dominating covered with brownish-black lamina bearing outer

a vast area of the alpine region where grazing animals sheaths. Leaves ca. 2–7 cm x 1.5–2 mm, much shorter feed extensively on it.

than the culm; lamina linear, slightly scabrid at apex, midrib smooth, greenish in colour; sheath 1–2 cm long. Inflorescence erect, racemose, oblong, ca. 2.4cm x

Date of publication (online): 26 June 2012 Date of publication (print): 26 June 2012

1mm with 4–6 spikes; axis slightly triquetrous. Spikes

ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print)

oblong, 9–11 x 3mm, with about 5 or 6 spikelets.

Editor: N.P. Balakrishnan

Spikelets all unisexual, lowest and lateral ones female

and terminal one male. Glumes of the lowest spikes

Manuscript details:

Ms # o3039

broadly ovate, ca 4x1 mm, glabrous, brownish, margin

Received 19 December 2011 Final received 16 May 2012

slightly hyaline, prominently, 1-nerved, apex long

Finally accepted 30 May 2012

attenuate, scabrid, base slightly sheathing. Lowest

Citation: Jana B., R.C. Srivastava, D.G. Long & G.P. Sinha (2012). New

spikelets female, elliptic, ca. 4 x 0.75 mm. Glumes

distributional record of a rare sedge Kobresia (Cyperaceae) from Sikkim, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4(6): 2664–2666.

of the female spikelets ovate to ovate-elliptic, ca. 2.5

x 0.5 mm, apex slightly acute to obtuse, glabrous,

Copyright: © Bikash Jana, R.C. Srivastava, D.G. Long & G.P. Sinha

2012. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. JoTT allows

brown, margin slightly hyaline at apex. Prophyll

unrestricted use of this article in any medium for non-profit purposes, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors

linear to oblanceolate, ca. 4 x 0.75 mm, membranous,

and the source of publication.

smooth, brownish, upper portion hyaline, margin

Acknowledgements: Authors are grateful to the Director, Botanical Survey of India for facilities.

OPEN ACCESS | FREE DOWNLOAD BSHC - Botanical Survey of India Sikkim Himalayas Circle Herbarium

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | June 2012 | 4(6): 2664–2666

Kobresia - new record from Sikkim

B. Jana et al.

Image 1. Kobresia harae Rajbh. & H. Ohba

A - close-up of apical portion of leaf; B - apical portion of inflorescence; C - female glume; D - prophyll with gynoecium; E - gynoecium; F - Male spikelet.

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | June 2012 | 4(6): 2664–2666

Kobresia - new record from Sikkim B. Jana et al.

Image 2. Herbarium of Kobresia harae

open in upper half from apex to the middle. Male of Cyperaceae:Sedges. Royal Botanic Garden, Kew. glume broadly elliptic-lanceolate, ca. 5 x 0.5 mm,

Karthikeyan, s., s.K. Jain, M.P. nayar, M. sanjappa (1989).

apex obtuse, glabrous. Stamens 3; filaments slender. Florae Indicae Enum. Monocot. Botanical Survey of India, Gynoecium ca. 3 x 0.5 mm; style 3-fid, ca.1mm long; Calcutta, 58–60pp.

Koyama, t. (1978). Kobresia, pp. 112–114. In: Hara, H., ovary trigonous, obovate, ca 2 x 0.5 mm, smooth, light

W.T. Stern & L.H.J. Williams (eds.). An Enumeration of yellow in colour. Rachiola ¾ th of the ovary, 1-nerved,

The Flowering Plants of Nepal—Vol. 1. British Museum smooth, greenish-yellow in colour.

(Natural History), London.

Flowering and Fruting: July. Kuekenthal, G. (1909). Kobresia Willd. In: Engler, Pflanzenr. Distribution: India: Sikkim ( Yumthang); Nepal. Heft 38: 40–48. Berlin. noltie, h. J. (1994). Kobresia Willdenow, 1(3): 333–352. In:

Grierson & Long (eds.). Flora of Bhutan. Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh.

reFerences

noltie, h.J. & s.r. Zhang (2010). Kobresia Willd., pp. 23: 269–285. In: Flora of China - Cyperaceae. Missouri

clarke, c.B. (1894). Kobresia Willd. 6: 696–702. In: Hooker, Botanical Garden Press (St. Louis), USA. J.D. (ed.). Flora of British India. L. Reeve, London.

Govaerts, h.a. rafael & d. simpson (2007). World Checklist

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | June 2012 | 4(6): 2664–2666

JoTT n OTE 4(6): 2667–2669

Microgomphus souteri Fraser, a new

The genus Microgomphus

addition to the Odonata (Insecta) fauna belongs to the family Gomphidae.

of Kerala, southern India

Its members are among the smallest species in the family,

K.G. Emiliyamma 1 , Muhamed Jafer Palot 2 &

and are coloured black marked with greenish-yellow.

C. Radhakrishnan 3 The genus Microgomphus is defined by the following

1,2,3 Zoological Survey of India, Western Ghat Regional Centre,

characters: Discoidal cell of forewing and hindwing

Jaferkhan Colony, Eranhipalam P.O., Kozhikode, Kerala

different in shape, that of forewing shorter than in

673006, India Email: 1 [email protected] (corresponding author),

hindwing; incomplete basal antenodal nervure absent;

2 [email protected], 3 [email protected]

superior anal appendages with an inner branch, inferior appendages slightly notched at the tips (Image 1), further they have more than two transverse nervures

The Odonata fauna of Kerala comprises 138 species, between the sectors of the arc, from arc to bifurcation representing 80 genera and 12 families (Emiliyamma of Rs (Radial Sector) in fore and in hindwing. & Radhakrishnan 2006; Emiliyamma et al. 2007). The

They are distributed in the humid parts of the present report adds an additional record from Kerala.

Western Ghats and the northeastern part of India at an During a faunistic survey tour conducted on 6

elevation of 609.5m and above. Other species of the June 2010 in the Aralam Wildlife Sanctuary (between genus are distributed in Myanmar, Malaysia, Sumatra,

Singapore, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, located in the Brahmagiri slopes of the northern Borneo and Africa. Species of the genus are arboreal Western Ghats in the Kannur District of Kerala, we by nature, but occasionally the males descend and collected a specimen of Microgomphus souteri Fraser, settle on rocks in midstream; they do not wander far 1924 at Valayamchal. The specimen was collected at from their parent streams, and may be found settled on around 0200hr below a tube light. The weather was vegetation, usually beside the water. The larvae breed rainy and windy all through the day and night and in deep pools in lowland and submontane streams the surroundings were thoroughly drenched. It is flowing through heavy primary rainforest (Fraser conjectured that the weather conditions might have 1934). The genus Microgomphus is represented in prompted the species to come to the light at night.

11 0 53’1”–11 0 59’14”N and 75 0 47’29”–75 0 55’58”E),

India by four species: M. chelifer Selys, 1858, M.

Date of publication (online): 26 June 2012 Date of publication (print): 26 June 2012 ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print)

Editor: Albert Orr

Manuscript details:

Ms # o2885 Received 27 July 2011

© K.G. Emiliyamma

Final received 11 May 2012 Finally accepted 01 June 2012

Citation: Emiliyamma, K.G., M.J. Palot & C. Radhakrishnan (2012). Microgomphus souteri Fraser, a new addition to the Odonata (Insecta) fauna of Kerala, southern India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4(6): 2667–2669.

Copyright: © K.G. Emiliyamma, Muhamed Jafer Palot & C. Radhakrishnan 2012. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium for non-profit purposes, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication.

Acknowledgements: The authors are grateful to the Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata for facilities and encouragement. Thanks are also due to Shri. K.V. Uthaman, Wildlife Warden, Aralam WLS for the permission accorded to conduct the field trip in the conservation area.

1mm OPEN ACCESS | FREE DOWNLOAD

Image 1. Male anal appendages of Microgomphus souteri

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | June 2012 | 4(6): 2667–2669

Addition to Odonata of Kerala K.G. Emiliyamma et al.

© Md. Jafer Palot

Image 2. Adult male Microgomphus souteri at Aralam Wildlife Sanctuary

souteri Fraser, 1924, M. torquatus (Selys, 1854) and thorax not confluent with mesothoracic collar; vertex M. verticalis (Selys, 1873) (Subramanian 2009). Of without marking; labrum black, marked with two large these, only M. souteri is endemic to the Western Ghats triangular greenish spots; abdominal segments 4 and 5 (Prasad & Varshney 1995).

without mid dorsal oval yellow spots; 8 to 10 without The characters of the specimen collected tally yellow markings. (though with some minor variations) with that of M.

However, we have observed minor variations from souteri (Fraser 1924). The genus Microgomphus and the description: anterior collar of prothorax black, two the species M. souteri Fraser is reported here for the large yellow spots on either side; antehumeral stripe first time from Kerala. The morphometric details of broad, short; mesepimeron and metepimeron yellow, the specimen are given below with their diagnostic separated by a thin black stripe at the posterolateral characters.

suture; undersurface of all coxae and thorax yellowish with white pruinescence; wings with pale yellow at the

Microgomphus souteri Fraser

subcostal and cubital spaces extended up to one cell (Image 2)

length; marking on abdominal segments similar, but Material examined: 06.vi.2010, 1 male, Aralam apicolateral spot absent on segment 2; markings on Wildlife Sanctuary, Kannur District, Kerala, India, segment 6 bilobed and on 7 th segment not overlapping coll. Muhamed Jafer Palot, Registration No. ZSI/ the transverse suture. WGRC/IR-INV-2240.

Fraser (1924) described Microgomphus torquatus Measurements: Total length - 40mm; Abdomen - souteri based on a specimen collected from Coorg, 28mm; Forewing - 25mm; Hindwing - 23mm.

Karnataka. According to Fraser (1934), the species diagnostic characters: Antehumeral stripes on is confined to Coorg and South Kanara and breeds in

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | June 2012 | 4(6): 2667–2669

Addition to Odonata of Kerala K.G. Emiliyamma et al.

Sampaji and Hallery Rivers and the Kibribetta stream,

reFerences

609–1067 m, Coorg. The present collection locality of the species from Kerala is however, only about 40–50

emiliyamma, K.G. & c. radhakrishnan (2006). First report km south of the type locality of the species. With the of Cyclogomphus heterostylus Selys (Odonata: Insecta) present discovery, a total of 139 species of dragonflies from Kerala, South India. Records of Zoological Survey of

India 106(Part-2): 123–124.

and damselflies (Odonata) representing 81 genera are

emiliyamma, K.G., c. radhakrishnan & M.J. Palot (2007).

now known to occur in Kerala. The specimen studied Odonata (Insecta) of Kerala. Zoological Survey of India, is deposited in the faunal depository of the Western

Kolkata, 243pp.

Ghat Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Fraser, F.c. (1924). Microgomphus torquatus souteri Fraser, Kozhikode, Kerala. Records of Indian Museum 26: 427, 474. Fraser, F.c. (1934). The Fauna of British India Including

distribution: India: Kodagu, Dakshina Kannada Ceylon and Burma. Odonata—Vol. 2. Taylor & Francis (Karnataka) and Kannur (Kerala) - present report.

Ltd., London, 398pp. Prasad, M. & r.K. Varshney (1995). A checklist of the odonata of India including data on larval studies. Oriental Insects 29: 385–428.

subramanian, K.a. (2009). A Checklist of Odonata (Insecta) of India: 1–36. http://www.zsi.gov.in/checklist/Odonata/ pdf. Downloaded on 20 December 2010.

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | June 2012 | 4(6): 2667–2669

JoTT B OOk R EvIEw 4(6): 2670–2672

A Contribution to the Herpetology of

maps). Color pictures are provided

Northern Pakistan: The Amphibians

for each species and recent updated

and Reptiles of Margalla Hills National

information is contained at the end

Park and Surrounding Regions

of each account.

By Rafaqat Masroor

Chapter 1 presents a systematic list of amphibians Published by Society for the Study of Amphibians

and reptiles in the park. Chapter 2 deals with specific and Reptiles, Ithaca, New York, USA,

identification, presenting line drawings and figures of ISBN: 978-0-916984-83-0, 20 April 2012, 217pp.

key characters such as sole and hind foot of frogs, bone (14x22 cm), Price $ 45 and scutes of turtle shells, basic scale types found on

Book reviewed by Raju Vyas

the bodies of lizards and snake scalation. Regrettably, the author did not include a diagram depicting the body

505, Krishnadeep Tower, Mission Road, Fatehgunj, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

characters of a typical frog, potentially confusing some

Email: [email protected]

readers.

Chapter 3 covers toads and frogs. Of note, Duttaphrynus melanosticus is only found in northern In this book Rafaqat Masroor focuses on the

Pakistan (especially in the hilly region), and not in the herpetofauna of Margalla Hills National Park (MHNP).

plains of Punjab and Sind Province. This is an interesting Located at the foothills of Himalaya, the MHNP is an observation given that this species is present in the important protected area, sharing a common boundary adjoining border areas of India, especially in the states of with the cities of Islamabad and Rawalpindi in northern Gujarat and Rajasthan (GEER 2009). The distribution

Pakistan. This book is the first regional field guide from of Microhyla ornata in Pakistan is interesting, as it also Pakistan with colored pictures and illustrations since the occurs only in northern Punjab. The author notes that compilation by Khan (2006); its title is reminiscent of ‘Sarkar (1984) has found them at Bhuj, Gujarat, India, Minton (1966). There is a foreword by Prof. Wolfgang very close to the southern Sind Province’. Uperodon Bohme and the book is dedicated to the renowned systoma is a very rare species in Pakistan, and is only herpetologist the late Dr. Khalid Javed Baig.

recorded from Shakarparian Hills, Islamabad (Baig & The author has published extensively on the subject,

Gvozdic 1998). M. ornata is recorded from two border with much of the work derived from an extensive study districts of Gujarat; Katchchh (Kachchh Desert Wildlife conducted from 2003–2009 in MHNP. He describes Sanctuary, Narayan Sarovar Wildlife Sanctuary and nine species of amphibians (from three families and eight Kachchh Bustard Wildlife Sanctuary: Daniel 1963; genera) and 33 species of reptiles (from 13 families and Vyas 2002, 2007, 2008) and Banaskantha (Jassore

30 genera) inhabiting the park, and also provides general Wildlife Sanctuary: GEER 2009). These protected information on their distribution throughout Pakistan.

areas are close (0 –160 km) to Pakistan border areas The detailed information provided in eight chapters with similar biogeography and habitats. U. systoma has covers diagnostic features, descriptions, habits and been recorded at Ajmer, Rajasthan (Sharma & Sharma habitats and distribution (including regional distribution 2009) and Banaskantha, Gujarat (GEER 2009). Thus,

it remains possible that both the Microhylidae species may occur on/along the border of Pakistan, especially

Date of publication (online): 26 June 2012

in Sind Province. The record of a single species of

Date of publication (print): 26 June 2012 ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print)

Fejervarya from MHNP is F. limnocharis, is a species

complex. Recently a number of new cryptic species has

Manuscript details:

Ms # o3218

been described from the complex from South East Asia.

Received 26 May 2012

Therefore a statement should have been rephrased

Copyright: © Raju Vyas 2012. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium for non-

as “a number of cryptic species containing the F.

profit purposes, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit

limnocharis species complex”. While only two species

to the authors and the source of publication.

of Fejervarya (F. limnocharis and F. syhadrensis) are

OPEN ACCESS | FREE DOWNLOAD

reported to inhabit Pakistan, there may be others present

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | June 2012 | 4(6): 2670–2672

Book Review R. Vyas

that could be detected by molecular studies. is a result of lack of referral of any literature for this Chapter 4 covers turtles and tortoises. Three species

particular species. There are half a dozen publications of turtles are found in MHNP of the eight species of

on the record of the species, which show that the species freshwater turtles recorded from all of Pakistan. Chapter

is widely distributed in Gujarat (Gayen 1999; Vyas

5 covers the lizard fauna, discussing a total of 13 species 1998, 2000, 2006; Sharma 2000) and Rajasthan (see: six families: Agamaidae (three species), Euplepharidae

Whitaker & Captain 2004).

(one species), Geckkonidae (three species), Lacertidae Over all distribution and habitat preferences of (two species), Scincidae (three species) and Varanidae

species inhabiting the park is discussed in Chapter 7. (one species). Lizards are the second most dominant

Chapter 8 discusses various threats and suggestions for group in area, after snakes. In the distribution note on

herpetofauna conservation in general, and particularly Eublepharis macularius, the author quotes the species

within the park. The book also contains an excellent distribution up to ‘… Rajputana and Khandesh districts

glossary covering technical terminology and a of India’. There are no such districts in independent

comprehensive bibliography.

India. The Rajputana and Khandesh provinces are the The book concludes with an updated list of 210 old monarch states named before India gained freedom;

species of amphibians (21 species) and reptiles (179 Rajputana now is a part of Rajasthan and Khandesh is

species) in Pakistan with common English names now a part of Maharashtra. Das (1997) elevated the

(author should have mentioned the local vernacular subspecies (E. m. fascus) to species rank as E. fascus.

name along with province distribution of each species). The population from Gujarat (Bhatt et al. 1999) and

The author has not clarified why some amphibians and Maharashtra is considered as E. fascus species (Mirza

reptiles have been omitted (see Table 1) that were listed & Upadhye 2010). The E. macularius population is

in the earlier works of Minton (1966) and Khan (2004; restricted to Pakistan and north-west India (Rajasthan,

2006). Such information would be beneficial to readers Punjab and Jammu), Das (1997) speculated that the

and subsequent studies.

Rann of Kachchh could be a barrier separating E. Khan (2006) provided a list of 23 species (three macularius and E. fuscus.

amphibians and 20 reptiles) as unconfirmed amphibians The snakes of MHNP are presented in Chapter 6,

and reptiles from Pakistan in literature, of which three covering 17 species from five families, dominated by

species are snakes; Dendrelaphis tristis, Coelognathus the Colubridae with nine species. The rare record of

helana and Natrix tessellata are now incorporated in the Dendrelaphis tristis from MHNP is accompanied with

present list by the author and therefore, it states a valid the author’s quote in ‘Remarks’ that ‘The Zoological

and confirmed record.

Survey of India has also not found it in the states of There are very minor and negligible spelling Gujarat or Rajasthan, both bordering states of Sind’,

mistakes (see on page 148: B. aeruleus) and some which comes out as a big surprise from the author in

technical taxonomic errors where the author is not the book. This is vague statement from the author

aware of or has not accepted recent taxonomic changes.

Table 1. List of species of amphibian and reptiles records from Pakistan in literatures No

Specie Name

Distribution

Source

Amphibian: Dicroglossidae

1 Euphlyctis hexadactylus (Lesson, 1834)

Punjab

Frost 2011

Reptile: Geckkonidae

2 Cyrtopodion fedtschenkoi (Strauch, 1887)

Baluchistan

Smith 1935; Minton 1966

3 Teratolepis fasciata Blyth, 1853

Jaulana, Hyderabad

Minton 1966

Reptile: Agamidae

4 Sitana ponticeriana Cuvier, 1844 *

Thar Parkar, Sind

Murray 1886

5 Trapelus ruderata Oliver, 1804

Quetta

Minton 1966; Khan 2004, 2006

Reptile: Lacertidae

6 Mesalina brevirostris Blanford, 1874

Kalabag, Punjab

Khan 2006

Reptile: Colubridae

7 Macropisthodon plumbicolor (Cantor, 1839) *

Sind

Murray 1884

* marked species recorded from border areas of Kachchh and Banashkanth, Gujarat by author. Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | June 2012 | 4(6): 2670–2672

Book Review R. Vyas

Khan, M.s. (2006). Amphibian and Reptiles of Pakistan. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, Florida, 311pp. Minton, s.a. (1966). A contributions to the herpetology of West Pakistan, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 134: 27–184.

Mirza, Z. & r. upadhye (2010). On the distribution and natural history of the endemic Eublepharid Gecko Eublepharis fuscus Borner, 1981 in India. SAURIA, Berlin 32(3): 15–23.

Murray, J.a. (1884). The vertebrate zoology of Sind: A Systematic Account, with Descriptionof all the known Mammals, Birds

The author should refer the taxonomic position of and Reptiles inhabiting the Province; Observation on the Python molurus with family Boidae. In the present

habit, and a Table of their Geographical Distribution in taxonomic chart of P. molurus, the species has been

Persia, Beloochstan, and Afghanistan; Punjab, North-west removed from the family Boidae and now all old world

Province, and Peninsula of India generally. Education pythons from subfamily (Pythoninae) are elevated to a Society’s Press, Byculla, Bombay, and Richardson and Co.,

London, 424pp.

family known as Pythonidae. The Old World pythons Murray, J.a. (1886). The Reptiles of Sind: A systematic account

are now considered distinct from Boidae and are widely with description of all the species inhabiting the Province recognized as a separate family (Vidal & Hedges

and a Table of their Geographical Distribution in Persia, 2004).

Beloochstan, and Afghanistan; Punjab, North-west Province, Overall, this book is handy in size and easy to carry

and Peninsula of India generally, with woodcut, lithographs, during field work. It is a worthwhile read for students and colored illustrations. Education Society’s Press, Byculla, Bombay, and Richardson and Co., London, 92pp.

and experts alike, and the best available reference on sarkar, a.K. (1984). Ecological studies on the amphibians of

the herpetofauna of Pakistan in general and certainly of Gujarat. Bulletin of the Zoological Society of India 6(1–3): the herpetofauna of Margalla Hills National Park.

87–93. sharma, K.K. & V. sharma (2009). Records of two Microhylids: Ornate Narrow Mouthed Frog (Microhyla ornata) and

reFerences

Marbled Balloon Frog (Uperodon systoma) from Ajmer district, central Rajasthan, India. Cobra 3(3): 11–15.

Baig, K.l. & l. Gvozdic (1998). Uperodon systoma: Record sharma, r.c. (2000). Reptilia, 243–297. In: State Fauna Series of a new microhylid frog from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of

8: Fauna of Gujarat, Part - I. Zoological Survey of India. Zoology 30(2): 155–156.

smith, M.a. (1935). The Fauna of British India, including Bhatt, K., r. Vyas & M. singh (1999). Herpetofauna of Gir

Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and amphibia. Vol. II: Sauria. protected area. Zoos’ Print Journal 14(5): 27–30.

Taylor and Francis Ltd. London, 440pp. daniel, J.c. (1963). Field guide to the amphibians of western

Vidal, n. & s.B. hedges (2004). Molecular evidence for a India. Part II. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society

terrestrial origin of snakes. Proceedings of the Royal Society 60(3): 690–702.

of London, B Supplement 271, S226–S229. das, I. (1997). Resolution of the systematic status of Eublepharis

Vyas, r. (1998). The reptiles of Gujarat State: Updated macularius fuscus Borner, 1981 (Eublepharidae: Sauria:

distribution. TigerPaper 25(1): 8–14. Squamata), Hamadryad 22: 13–20.

Vyas, r. (2000). Herpetofauna of Hingolgadh Nature Education Frost, d.r. (2011). Amphibian Species of the World: an Online

Sanctuary, Gujarat. Zoos’ Print Journal 15(6): 285–286. Reference. Version 5.5 (31 January, 2011). Electronic

Vyas, r. (2002). Preliminary survey of herpetofauna of Narayan Database

Sarovar Sanctuary, Gujarat. Zoos’ Print Journal 17(6): 812– herpetology /amphibia/. Accesses on 23rd May 2012

accessible

at

http://research.amnh.org/vz/

Gayen, n.c. (1999). A synopsis of the reptiles of Gujarat, Vyas, r. (2006). Reptilian diversity of Jambughoda Wildlife western India. Hamadryad 24(1): 1–22.

Sanctuary, Gujarat. Tigerpaper 33(1): 20–23 Geer (2009). The status of Biodiversity of Jessore Wildlife

Vyas, r. (2007). Present conservation scenario of reptile fauna Sanctuary (A comprehensive ecological and socio-Economic

in Gujarat State, India. The Indian Forester 133(10): 1381– study). Gujarat Ecological Education and Research

(GEER) Foundation, Gandhinagar and Forest Department, Vyas, r. (2008). Review of the current diversity and richness of Government of Gujarat, March 2009, 167pp. (Published

amphibians of Gujarat, India. The Indian Forester 134(10): Report).

Khan, M.s. (2004). Annotated checklist of amphibians and Whitaker, r. & a. captain (2004). Snakes of India: The Field reptiles of Pakistan. Asiatic Herpetological Research 10:

Guide. Draco Books, Chennai, India, xiv+481pp. 191–121.

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | June 2012 | 4(6): 2670–2672

Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Tai Po, Hong Kong Dr. Luke Rendell, St. Andrews, UK Dr. Krushnamegh Kunte, Cambridge, USA

Dr. Anjum N. Rizvi, Dehra Dun, India Prof. Dr. Adriano Brilhante Kury, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Dr. Leif Ryvarden, Oslo, Norway Dr. P. Lakshminarasimhan, Howrah, India

Prof. Michael Samways, Matieland, South Africa Dr. Carlos Alberto S de Lucena, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Dr. Yves Samyn , Brussels, Belgium Dr. Glauco Machado, São Paulo, Brazil

Dr. Asok K. Sanyal, Kolkata, India Dr. Gowri Mallapur , Mamallapuram, India

Dr. K.R. Sasidharan , Coimbatore, India Dr. George Mathew, Peechi, India

Dr. Kumaran Sathasivam , India Prof. Richard Kiprono Mibey, Eldoret, Kenya

Dr. S. Sathyakumar , Dehradun, India Dr. Lionel Monod, Genève, Switzerland

Dr. M.M. Saxena , Bikaner, India Dr. Shomen Mukherjee , Jamshedpur, India

Dr. Hendrik Segers, Vautierstraat, Belgium Dr. P.O. Nameer, Thrissur, India

Dr. R. Siddappa Setty, Bengaluru, India Dr. D. Narasimhan, Chennai, India

Dr. Subodh Sharma , Towson, USA Dr. T.C. Narendran , Kozhikode, India

Prof. B.K. Sharma , Shillong, India Mr. Stephen D. Nash, Stony Brook, USA

Prof. K.K. Sharma, Jammu, India Dr. K.S. Negi, Nainital, India

Dr. R.M. Sharma , Jabalpur, India Dr. K.A.I. Nekaris , Oxford, UK

Dr. Tan Koh Siang , Kent Ridge Road, Singapore Dr. Heok Hee Ng , Singapore

Dr. Arun P. Singh, Jorhat, India Dr. Boris P. Nikolov, Sofia, Bulgaria

Dr. Lala A.K. Singh , Bhubaneswar, India Prof. Annemarie Ohler, Paris, France

Prof. Willem H. De Smet, Wilrijk, Belgium Dr. Shinsuki Okawara, Kanazawa, Japan

Mr. Peter Smetacek , Nainital, India Dr. Albert Orr, Nathan, Australia

Dr. Humphrey Smith, Coventry, UK Dr. Geeta S. Padate, Vadodara, India

Dr. Hema Somanathan, Trivandrum, India Dr. Larry M. Page, Gainesville, USA

Dr. C. Srinivasulu , Hyderabad, India Dr. Arun K. Pandey, Delhi, India

Dr. Ulrike Streicher , Danang, Vietnam Dr. Prakash Chand Pathania, Ludhiana, India

Dr. K.A. Subramanian , Pune, India Dr. Malcolm Pearch, Kent, UK

Mr. K.S. Gopi Sundar , New Delhi, India Dr. Richard S. Peigler, San Antonio, USA

Dr. P.M. Sureshan , Patna, India Dr. Rohan Pethiyagoda, Sydney, Australia

Prof. R. Varatharajan, Imphal, India Mr. J. Praveen, Bengaluru, India

Dr. Karthikeyan Vasudevan , Dehradun, India Dr. Mark R Stanley Price, Tubney, UK

Dr. R.K. Verma , Jabalpur, India Dr. Robert Michael Pyle, Washington, USA

Dr. W. Vishwanath , Manipur, India Dr. Muhammad Ather Rafi, Islamabad, Pakistan

Dr. E. Vivekanandan, Cochin, India Dr. H. Raghuram, Bengaluru, India

Dr. Gernot Vogel, Heidelberg, Germany Dr. Dwi Listyo Rahayu, Pemenang, Indonesia

Dr. Ted J. Wassenberg , Cleveland, Australia Dr. Sekar Raju, Suzhou, China

Dr. Stephen C. Weeks, Akron, USA Dr. Vatsavaya S. Raju , Warangal, India

Prof. Yehudah L. Werner , Jerusalem, Israel Dr. V.V. Ramamurthy , New Delhi, India

Mr. Nikhil Whitaker , Mamallapuram, India Dr (Mrs). R. Ramanibai , Chennai, India

Dr. Hui Xiao, Chaoyang, China Prof. S.N. Ramanujam, Shillong, India

Dr. April Yoder, Little Rock, USA Dr. Alex Ramsay, LS2 7YU, UK Dr. M.K. Vasudeva Rao, Pune, India

English Editors

Dr. Robert Raven , Queensland, Australia Mrs. Mira Bhojwani , Pune, India Dr. K. Ravikumar , Bengaluru, India

Dr. Fred Pluthero , Toronto, Canada

Journal of Threatened Taxa is indexed/abstract-

ed in Zoological Records, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Index Fungorum, Bibliography of Systematic My- cology, EBSCO and Google Scholar.

j OuRnal OF T hREaTEnED T axa

June 2012 | Vol. 4 | No. 6 | Pages 2617–2672 Date of Publication 26 June 2012 (online & print)

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of articles in any medium for non-profit purposes, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication.

ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print)

Communications Species diversity of small mammals at Gunung

Stong State Park, Kelantan, Malaysia

-- Vijaya Kumaran Jayaraj, Nurul Farah Diyana Ahmad Tahir, Noor Amirah Udin, Noor Farahin Kamarul Baharin, Siti Katijah Ismail & Siti Noor Azwa Zakaria, Pp. 2617– 2628

Predicting effects of rainforest fragmentation from live trapping studies of small mammals in Sri Lanka

-- Mayuri R. Wijesinghe, Pp. 2629–2636

Opinion A postulate for tiger recovery: the case of the

Caspian Tiger

-- C.A. Driscoll, I. Chestin, H. Jungius, O. Pereladova, Y. Darman, E. Dinerstein, J. Seidensticker, J. Sanderson, S. Christie, S.J. Luo, M. Shrestha, Y. Zhuravlev, O. Uphyrkina, Y.V. Jhala, S.P. Yadav, D.G. Pikunov, N. Yamaguchi, D.E. Wildt, J.L.D. Smith, L. Marker, P.J. Nyhus, R. Tilson, D.W. Macdonald & S.J. O’Brien, Pp. 2637–2643

Short Communication CEPF Western Ghats Special Series

Freshwater fish fauna of Krishna River at Wai, northern Western Ghats, India

-- Sanjay S. Kharat, Mandar Paingankar & Neelesh Dahanukar, Pp. 2644–2652

Notes Aizoaceae (Magnoliopsida: Caryophyllales) - a new

family record to the flora of Andaman Islands, India

-- L. Rasingam, Pp. 2653–2655

Xerophyte Caralluma stalagmifera var. longipetala (Asclepiadaceae): a new record to the flora of Karnataka, India

-- M. Ramachandra Naik & Y.L. Krishnamurthy, Pp. 2656–2659

Belosynapsis vivipara (Dalzell) C.E.C. Fisch. (Commelinaceae), a vulnerable spiderwort, rediscovered after sixteen decades from Maharashtra, India

-- Shrinath Kavade, Subhash Deokule, P. Lakshminarasimhan, Prakash Diwakar & Sachin Punekar, Pp. 2660–2663

New distributional record of a rare sedge Kobresia (Cyperaceae) from Sikkim, India

-- Bikash Jana, R.C.Srivastava, D.G. Long & G.P. Sinha, Pp. 2664–2666

Microgomphus souteri Fraser, a new addition to the Odonata (Insecta) fauna of Kerala, southern India

-- K.G. Emiliyamma, Muhamed Jafer Palot & C. Radhakrishnan, Pp. 2667–2669

Book Review

A Contribution to the Herpetology of Northern Pakistan: The Amphibians and Reptiles of Margalla Hills National Park and Surrounding Regions—By

Rafaqat Masroor Published by Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Ithaca, New York, USA, ISBN:

978-0-916984-83-0, 20 April 2012, 217pp. (14x22 cm), Price $ 45 -- Book reviewed by Raju Vyas, Pp. 2670–2672