Data Analysis Technique Research Procedure

32

G. Research Schedule

The schedule of the research from preparation to the report writing is described in the following table 1. No Activity Time 1 Preparation  Designing pre-test June 2015 in week IV  Doing class room observation and pre-test July 2015 in week III and IV  Analyzing the pre-test result August 2015 in week I  Designing lesson plan and learning media August 2015 in week II 2 Action  Doing an action of cycle I August 2015 in week III  Analyzing and reflecting August 2015 in week IV  Doing an action of cycle II September 2015 in week I  Analyzing and reflecting September 2015 in week II 3 Report  Writing report of classroom action September 2015 in week III research To November 2015 in week I Table 1. Research Schedule PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 33

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This chapter presents the research results and findings. There are two sections in this chapter. The first part presents the result of classroom action research within two cycles and the second part is discussion of the research. They are the process of using the Snakes and Ladders board game for improving the students‟ speaking ability of eleventh grade of Cookery Department of Saint Pius X Vocational High School Magelang and the result of the action.

A. The Students’ Score in Classroom Action Research

The students‟s score in classroom action research both in cycle 1 and 2 in terms of comparison of the average test result will be presented in the following tables and graph.

1. Cycle 1

The students‟ score in cycle 1 will be described in the table 1.2. Student Pre- Test Post Test 1 1 83.2 85 2 73.8 79.5 3 53.4 70 4 65.4 72 5 55 65 6 65 65 7 81 82 8 68 74 9 66.8 72 10 65 73.5 11 60.8 72 34 Table 1.2. The students‟ score in cycle 1

2. Cycle 2

The students‟ score result of cycle 2 is described in table 1.3 Student Pre- Test Post Test 1 Post Test 2 1 83.2 85 89 2 73.8 79,5 89 3 53.4 70 70 4 65.4 72 91 5 55 65 69 6 65 65 90 7 81 82 88 Student Pre- Test Post Test 1 12 80.6 81 13 69.2 70.5 14 63 72 15 77.2 78 16 63 72 17 64 74 18 57 67 19 81 82 20 54.4 72.5 21 66 69 22 72.8 72 23 73.2 73 24 61.2 72 25 86 86 26 86 85 27 64.2 72 28 75 79 29 76 73.5 30 77.4 79 31 65.4 70 32 73.8 77 33 67.2 72 34 82.2 83 35 72 75 36 77.2 77.5 37 58 73 38 62.4 72 Mean 69.547 74.7 35 Student Pre- Test Post Test 1 Post Test 2 8 68 74 91 9 66.8 72 50 10 65 73.5 87 11 60.8 72 79 12 80.6 81 87 13 69.2 70.5 86 14 63 72 70 15 77.2 78 89 16 63 72 75 17 64 74 83 18 57 67 78 19 81 82 91 20 54.4 72.5 73 21 66 69 53 22 72.8 72 78 23 73.2 73 56 24 61.2 72 78 25 86 86 92 26 86 85 90 27 64.2 72 70 28 75 79 70 29 76 73.5 68 30 77.4 79 65 31 65.4 70 83 32 73.8 77 86 33 67.2 72 65 34 82.2 83 95 35 72 75 80 36 77.2 77.5 69 37 58 73 87 38 62.4 72 59 Mean 69.547

74.7 79.2

Table 1.3. The students‟ score result of cycle 2 Based on the students‟ score result in the tests can be stated that the improvement happened significantly. The significant improvement of mean of students‟ score is presented in the following graph 1. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 36 Graph 1. The Student‟s score on Speaking Test

B. Discussion on the Implementation of Action Research

The implementation of the action research was done in two cycles. The cycle one was conducted in July – August 2015. It consisted of three meetings; two meetings for teaching and learning process and one meeting for post test 1. Furthermore, the cycle two was conducted in September 2015 which was consisted three meetings as well; two meetings for teaching and learning process and one meeting for post test 2. The following explanation shows the action research conducted using the Snakes and Ladders board game.

1. Cycle 1 Report

Cycle one was conducted in August 2015. Each cycle included four steps. The steps in the first cycle were planning, action, observation and reflection. Each of steps would be explained in the following part. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI