Pronominal Clitics The Clitics Forms

transcription is written as hi: + ɪz  [hi:z], and for who’s the transcription is written as hu: + ɪz  [hu:z]. From the three notations, the ɪ in ɪz is also deleted and the z remains unchanged because it is preceded by a vowel sound. As a result, the morphophonemic process that can be applied is loss of phonemes. The next word is there’s. The uncontracted form of there’s is there is. Same as the previous, the process of the reduction is by simply deleting i in is. However, it is not that simple if we look at the phonological rule. The rule is written as ðer + ɪz  [ðerz]. From the transcription, we can see that ɪ in ɪz is deleted. The z is not changing because it is preceded by r which is a voiced sound same as r. In this form, there is only one morphophonemic process occurred. It is loss of phonemes. ii. Has There are three words that have contracted has. They are it’s, she’s, and Sue nie’s been. The first word to be analyzed is it’s. The uncontracted form of it’s is it has. By looking at it, there are two letters that is omitted, h and a in has. A phonological transcription is used in order to get the exact reduction process of this clitic. The transcription can be written to ɪt + hæz  [ɪts]. If we compared the transcription with the previous it’s it is, it has the same transcription. The phoneme h and æ are deleted and z becomes s because it is preceded by t which is a voiceless sound. Therefore, it changes into a voiceless sound too. In this cliticization, there are two the morphophonemic process that can be applied. The first process is loss of phonemes. That is by omitting the phoneme in the contracted word. The second process is simple change of phoneme. That is by changing the feature of the phoneme in the contracted word to be identical with the head. The next two words are she’s and Sue nie’s. These two words have a similarity that can be seen in a phonological transcription ʃ i: + hæz  [ʃ i:z] for she’s, and for Sue nie’s can be seen as su:ni: + hæz  [su:ni:z]. Same as the previous clitics, the h and æ in hæz is omitted, but the z remains unchanged. It is because z preceded by a i: which is a voiced sound also. Therefore, the morphophonemic process that can be applied in those two cliticizations is loss of phonemes. b. Would According to Zwicky 1970, the contracted form of had and would is both ‘d. However, according to the data found in the two magazines, there is only one uncontracted form of ’d. It is would. Therefore, the uncontracted form of I’d, we’d, and you’d are I would, we would, and you would. As previously mentioned, there are only three words that have contracted form of would. It turns out that the three words have the similar reduction process. It can be seen from the phonetic transcription of I’d is aɪ + w ʊd  [aɪd], for we’d the phonetic transcription is wi: + w ʊd  [wi:d], and for you’d the phonetic transcription is ju: + w ʊd  [ju:d]. From the transcription, it can be observed that there are two phonemes in w ʊd that are deleted. They are w and ʊ. The d remains unchanged because according to Longman Pronunciation Dictionary, it is used only after words usually pronouns ending in vowel sounds. Based from the explanation above, d is preceded by vowel sounds ɪ, i:, and