Directory UMM :HenikSukorini:
ARCHIVES OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND TOXIC OLOGY
A
R H I V
Z A
H I G I J E N U
R A D A
I
T O K S I K O L O G I J U
SUMMARY REPORT*
Manuscript
number:
Title:
2480
Referee:
Henik Sukorini
Plant-Pathogenic Fungi Present on Seeds of Different Pea Cultivars in Poland
The manuscript is suitable
for publication:
The manuscript can be classified as:
– in its present form
– scientific paper
– after minor revision
– professional paper
– after major revision
– review
The manuscript is not suitable
for publication
– other (please indicate category)
Comments for the Editorial Board only:
The paper can be accepted with major revision.
1. I found inconsistency in writing among methods, result, discussion, and
conclusion, In method just mention about isolation, identification,and
evaluation weather conditions, but in result author mention about percentage
of contaminated seed and mycotoxin, and mycotoxin part was very urgent for
your journal, not just telling about pathogen it self like pathology journal.
2. Author observed serially within 2 years, but they don't used statistic for
analysis the data. It is better if they used time series analysis.
3. Number and name of pathogen before observation in first year and second
year Information are needed, so, the aothor can explain why in the second
year species n its number were different.
Date and signature:
20 Maret 2014
*
Referee's Guidelines. In your comments to the author(s) please include the following considerations.
1.
Does the title adequately reflect the subject of the manuscript?
2.
Does the summary give all necessary information about the background, results and
conclusions?
3.
Are the methods (including statistical analysis) clearly presented?
4.
Are tables and figures intelligible without reference to the text?
5.
Are conclusions firmly based on the results?
6.
Does the manuscript include up-to-date references?
ARCHIVES OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND TOXIC OLOGY
A
R H I V
Z A
H I G I J E N U
Report for the author(s):
MS no. 2480 -
R A D A
I
T O K S I K O L O G I J U
Plant-Pathogenic Fungi Present on Seeds of Different Pea
Cultivars in Poland
1. The title reflected to the paper.
2. Summary: mention about mycotoxins in discussion and conclusion but no research
about mycotoxin in this paper, although actually this is important part related with
this journal. How if this paper added with mycotoxin research.
3. Statistical analysis was needed and because the research used research serially,
time series analysis also needed.
A number n pathogen before doing the research in the first and second year should
be presented to help in discussion part, so in the discussion part not just writing
about happen and not happen and its number.
4. Table 2 not in line with result and discussion that mention about percentage but
none in table 2.
5. Mycotoxin ability and plant performance and yield in conclusions were not in result
ADDRESS OF THE EDITORIAL OFFICE:
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
P.O. Box 291, HR–10001 Zagreb, Croatia
Phone (+385 1) 4673 188; Fax (+385 1) 4673 303; E-mail: arhiv@imi.hr
ARCHIVES OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND TOXIC OLOGY
A
R H I V
Z A
H I G I J E N U
R A D A
ADDRESS OF THE EDITORIAL OFFICE:
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
P.O. Box 291, HR–10001 Zagreb, Croatia
Phone (+385 1) 4673 188; Fax (+385 1) 4673 303; E-mail: arhiv@imi.hr
I
T O K S I K O L O G I J U
ARCHIVES OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND TOXIC OLOGY
A
R H I V
Z A
H I G I J E N U
R A D A
ADDRESS OF THE EDITORIAL OFFICE:
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
P.O. Box 291, HR–10001 Zagreb, Croatia
Phone (+385 1) 4673 188; Fax (+385 1) 4673 303; E-mail: arhiv@imi.hr
I
T O K S I K O L O G I J U
A
R H I V
Z A
H I G I J E N U
R A D A
I
T O K S I K O L O G I J U
SUMMARY REPORT*
Manuscript
number:
Title:
2480
Referee:
Henik Sukorini
Plant-Pathogenic Fungi Present on Seeds of Different Pea Cultivars in Poland
The manuscript is suitable
for publication:
The manuscript can be classified as:
– in its present form
– scientific paper
– after minor revision
– professional paper
– after major revision
– review
The manuscript is not suitable
for publication
– other (please indicate category)
Comments for the Editorial Board only:
The paper can be accepted with major revision.
1. I found inconsistency in writing among methods, result, discussion, and
conclusion, In method just mention about isolation, identification,and
evaluation weather conditions, but in result author mention about percentage
of contaminated seed and mycotoxin, and mycotoxin part was very urgent for
your journal, not just telling about pathogen it self like pathology journal.
2. Author observed serially within 2 years, but they don't used statistic for
analysis the data. It is better if they used time series analysis.
3. Number and name of pathogen before observation in first year and second
year Information are needed, so, the aothor can explain why in the second
year species n its number were different.
Date and signature:
20 Maret 2014
*
Referee's Guidelines. In your comments to the author(s) please include the following considerations.
1.
Does the title adequately reflect the subject of the manuscript?
2.
Does the summary give all necessary information about the background, results and
conclusions?
3.
Are the methods (including statistical analysis) clearly presented?
4.
Are tables and figures intelligible without reference to the text?
5.
Are conclusions firmly based on the results?
6.
Does the manuscript include up-to-date references?
ARCHIVES OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND TOXIC OLOGY
A
R H I V
Z A
H I G I J E N U
Report for the author(s):
MS no. 2480 -
R A D A
I
T O K S I K O L O G I J U
Plant-Pathogenic Fungi Present on Seeds of Different Pea
Cultivars in Poland
1. The title reflected to the paper.
2. Summary: mention about mycotoxins in discussion and conclusion but no research
about mycotoxin in this paper, although actually this is important part related with
this journal. How if this paper added with mycotoxin research.
3. Statistical analysis was needed and because the research used research serially,
time series analysis also needed.
A number n pathogen before doing the research in the first and second year should
be presented to help in discussion part, so in the discussion part not just writing
about happen and not happen and its number.
4. Table 2 not in line with result and discussion that mention about percentage but
none in table 2.
5. Mycotoxin ability and plant performance and yield in conclusions were not in result
ADDRESS OF THE EDITORIAL OFFICE:
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
P.O. Box 291, HR–10001 Zagreb, Croatia
Phone (+385 1) 4673 188; Fax (+385 1) 4673 303; E-mail: arhiv@imi.hr
ARCHIVES OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND TOXIC OLOGY
A
R H I V
Z A
H I G I J E N U
R A D A
ADDRESS OF THE EDITORIAL OFFICE:
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
P.O. Box 291, HR–10001 Zagreb, Croatia
Phone (+385 1) 4673 188; Fax (+385 1) 4673 303; E-mail: arhiv@imi.hr
I
T O K S I K O L O G I J U
ARCHIVES OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND TOXIC OLOGY
A
R H I V
Z A
H I G I J E N U
R A D A
ADDRESS OF THE EDITORIAL OFFICE:
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
P.O. Box 291, HR–10001 Zagreb, Croatia
Phone (+385 1) 4673 188; Fax (+385 1) 4673 303; E-mail: arhiv@imi.hr
I
T O K S I K O L O G I J U