T KIM 1201240 Bibliography
75
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Allahyari, T., Rangi, N.H., Khosravi, Y., and Zayeri, F. 2011. Development and
Evaluating of A New Questionnaire for Rating of Cognitive Failures at
Work. IJOH.3:6-11.
Anwar, S. (2013). Pengolahan Bahan Ajar. Handout Perkuliahan. Tidak
diterbitkan
Baehr, G., Jerald, D., Laurel, D., Diane, F., Elizabeth, O., John, J. (1995).
Ceramics Windows to the Future. Urbana-Champaign: University of
Illinois
Barke, H., Al, H., Sileshi Y. (2009). Misconceptions in Chemisty. Varlag Berlin:
Springer
Boch, P and Jean, C. (2007). Ceramic Materials Processes, Properties and
Applications. United Kingdom. ISTE
Brady, J., Jesperson, D., and A. Hyslop. (2011). Chemistry The Molecular Nature
of Matter. New York: Mc Graw Hill
Brown, T., Eugene, H., Bruce, E., Catherine, J., Patrick, M (2009). Chemistry
Contexts Edisi 11. Australia : Pearson Education Australia
Chang, R. and Jason, O. (2011). General Chemistry : The Essensial Concept. New
York: Mc Graw Hill
Dick, W and Carey L. (1996). The Systematic Design of Instruction. 3rd Ed,
Glenview, IL : Scott, Foresman and company.
Duit, R. (1995). A Model of Educational Reconstruction. San Fransisco : Paper of
Research in Sains Teaching (NARST).
Duit, R. (2007). Science Educational Research Internationally: Conception,
Research method, Domain research. Eurasia jurnal of mathematics.
ISSN:1305-8223.
Duit, R., Gropengierber, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M., Parchmann, I. (2012).
The Model of Eductional Reconstruction - A Framework for Improving
Teaching and Learning Science. Sci. Educ. Res. and Pract. in Europe:
Retrospective and Prospective, 5, 13–37
SUCI MARYAM AZMIL, 2014
REKONSTRUKSI BAHAN AJAR IKATAN KIMIA MENGGUNAKAN KONTEKS KERAMIK UNTUK MENCAPAI
LITERASI SAINS SISWA SMAUniversitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu
|perpustakaan.upi.edu
76
Firman, H. (2007). Laporan Hasil Analisis Literasi Sains berdasarkan hasil PISA
Nasional tahun 2006. Puspendik
Gerlach, V. (2004). Teaching and Media: A Systematic Approach. Englemood
Cliffs: Prentice Hall
Ginsburg and Sandra. (2004). SES, Ethnic, and Gender Differences in Young
Children's Informal Addition and Subtraction: A Clinical Interview
Investigation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 26. 171-192
Hayat, B dan Yusuf, S.(2010). Mutu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hempel, C. (1966). Philosophy of Natural Science. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc
Holbrook, J. (2005). ”Making Chemistry Teaching Relevant”. Chemical
Education International.6(1), 1-12.Holbrook, J. (2005). ”Making
Chemistry Teaching Relevant”. Chemical Education International.6(1), 112.
Holbrook, J dan Rannikmae, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy.
[online].Tersedia:http://www.ut.ee/BG/miia_rannikmae/Publications/The_
Meaning_ of_Scientific_Literacy.pdf [7 Januari 2014]
Kemendikbud. (2013). Bahan Uji Publik Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kattman, U., M, Esther. van Dijk. (1995). A Research Model for The Study of
Science Teacher PCK and Improving Teacher Education. Teaching and
Teacher Education. 23. 885-897
Korpan, C.A., Bisanz, G.L., Bisanz, J., and Henderson, J. (1997). Assesing
Literacy in Science: Evaluation of Scientific News Briefs. Science
Education; 81. 515-532.
Laherto, A. (2012). Opportunities and challenges in secondary school and in outof-school settings. Nanoscience Education for scienctific Literacy. Acadeic
Dissertation. Helsinki.
Lawshe. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Journal Personnel
Psycology. 28, 563-575.
McCoComas. (2002) . The nature of Science in Science Education Rationales and
Strategies. United States of America: Kluwer Academic Press.
SUCI MARYAM AZMIL, 2014
REKONSTRUKSI BAHAN AJAR IKATAN KIMIA MENGGUNAKAN KONTEKS KERAMIK UNTUK MENCAPAI
LITERASI SAINS SISWA SMAUniversitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu
|perpustakaan.upi.edu
77
Nentwig, P., Parchmann, I., Demuth, R., Grasel, C., Ralle B. (2002). “Chemie im
Context-From situated learning in relevant contexts to a systematic
development of basic chemical concepts”. Makalah Simposium
Internasional IPN-UYSEG Oktober 2002, Kiel Jerman.
Niebert, K and Gropengiesser. (2013). The Model of Educational Reconstruction:
A Framework for the Design of Theory-based Content Specific
Interventions. The Example of Climate Change. Educational Design
Research. Netherlands: SLO
OECD (2012). PISA 2012 Assessment Framework Key competencies in reading,
mathematics
and
science.
[online].
Tersedia:http://
http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46962580.pdf [6 Januari 2014].
Setiadi, R. dan Agus, A. (2004). Dasar-Dasar Pemrograman Software
Pembelajaran. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia FPMIPA UPI
Show-Yu, L. (2009). Chemical Literacy and Learning Sources of Non-Science
Major Undergraduates on Understandings of Environmental Issues.
Chemical Education Journal (CED). 13, (1) Registration No 13-3.
Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., and Hofdtein, A.(2006). The Use of Scientific Literacy
Taxonomy for Assessing the Development of Chemical Literacy among
High-school Students. The Royal Society of Chemistry. Chemistry education
research and practice, 2006, 7(4), 203-225.
Siregar, N. (1998). Penelitian Kelas : Teori, Metodologi dan Analisis. Bandung:
IKIP bandung press.
Sitepu. (2012). Penulisan Buku Teks Pelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
SUCI MARYAM AZMIL, 2014
REKONSTRUKSI BAHAN AJAR IKATAN KIMIA MENGGUNAKAN KONTEKS KERAMIK UNTUK MENCAPAI
LITERASI SAINS SISWA SMAUniversitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu
|perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Allahyari, T., Rangi, N.H., Khosravi, Y., and Zayeri, F. 2011. Development and
Evaluating of A New Questionnaire for Rating of Cognitive Failures at
Work. IJOH.3:6-11.
Anwar, S. (2013). Pengolahan Bahan Ajar. Handout Perkuliahan. Tidak
diterbitkan
Baehr, G., Jerald, D., Laurel, D., Diane, F., Elizabeth, O., John, J. (1995).
Ceramics Windows to the Future. Urbana-Champaign: University of
Illinois
Barke, H., Al, H., Sileshi Y. (2009). Misconceptions in Chemisty. Varlag Berlin:
Springer
Boch, P and Jean, C. (2007). Ceramic Materials Processes, Properties and
Applications. United Kingdom. ISTE
Brady, J., Jesperson, D., and A. Hyslop. (2011). Chemistry The Molecular Nature
of Matter. New York: Mc Graw Hill
Brown, T., Eugene, H., Bruce, E., Catherine, J., Patrick, M (2009). Chemistry
Contexts Edisi 11. Australia : Pearson Education Australia
Chang, R. and Jason, O. (2011). General Chemistry : The Essensial Concept. New
York: Mc Graw Hill
Dick, W and Carey L. (1996). The Systematic Design of Instruction. 3rd Ed,
Glenview, IL : Scott, Foresman and company.
Duit, R. (1995). A Model of Educational Reconstruction. San Fransisco : Paper of
Research in Sains Teaching (NARST).
Duit, R. (2007). Science Educational Research Internationally: Conception,
Research method, Domain research. Eurasia jurnal of mathematics.
ISSN:1305-8223.
Duit, R., Gropengierber, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M., Parchmann, I. (2012).
The Model of Eductional Reconstruction - A Framework for Improving
Teaching and Learning Science. Sci. Educ. Res. and Pract. in Europe:
Retrospective and Prospective, 5, 13–37
SUCI MARYAM AZMIL, 2014
REKONSTRUKSI BAHAN AJAR IKATAN KIMIA MENGGUNAKAN KONTEKS KERAMIK UNTUK MENCAPAI
LITERASI SAINS SISWA SMAUniversitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu
|perpustakaan.upi.edu
76
Firman, H. (2007). Laporan Hasil Analisis Literasi Sains berdasarkan hasil PISA
Nasional tahun 2006. Puspendik
Gerlach, V. (2004). Teaching and Media: A Systematic Approach. Englemood
Cliffs: Prentice Hall
Ginsburg and Sandra. (2004). SES, Ethnic, and Gender Differences in Young
Children's Informal Addition and Subtraction: A Clinical Interview
Investigation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 26. 171-192
Hayat, B dan Yusuf, S.(2010). Mutu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hempel, C. (1966). Philosophy of Natural Science. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc
Holbrook, J. (2005). ”Making Chemistry Teaching Relevant”. Chemical
Education International.6(1), 1-12.Holbrook, J. (2005). ”Making
Chemistry Teaching Relevant”. Chemical Education International.6(1), 112.
Holbrook, J dan Rannikmae, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy.
[online].Tersedia:http://www.ut.ee/BG/miia_rannikmae/Publications/The_
Meaning_ of_Scientific_Literacy.pdf [7 Januari 2014]
Kemendikbud. (2013). Bahan Uji Publik Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kattman, U., M, Esther. van Dijk. (1995). A Research Model for The Study of
Science Teacher PCK and Improving Teacher Education. Teaching and
Teacher Education. 23. 885-897
Korpan, C.A., Bisanz, G.L., Bisanz, J., and Henderson, J. (1997). Assesing
Literacy in Science: Evaluation of Scientific News Briefs. Science
Education; 81. 515-532.
Laherto, A. (2012). Opportunities and challenges in secondary school and in outof-school settings. Nanoscience Education for scienctific Literacy. Acadeic
Dissertation. Helsinki.
Lawshe. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Journal Personnel
Psycology. 28, 563-575.
McCoComas. (2002) . The nature of Science in Science Education Rationales and
Strategies. United States of America: Kluwer Academic Press.
SUCI MARYAM AZMIL, 2014
REKONSTRUKSI BAHAN AJAR IKATAN KIMIA MENGGUNAKAN KONTEKS KERAMIK UNTUK MENCAPAI
LITERASI SAINS SISWA SMAUniversitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu
|perpustakaan.upi.edu
77
Nentwig, P., Parchmann, I., Demuth, R., Grasel, C., Ralle B. (2002). “Chemie im
Context-From situated learning in relevant contexts to a systematic
development of basic chemical concepts”. Makalah Simposium
Internasional IPN-UYSEG Oktober 2002, Kiel Jerman.
Niebert, K and Gropengiesser. (2013). The Model of Educational Reconstruction:
A Framework for the Design of Theory-based Content Specific
Interventions. The Example of Climate Change. Educational Design
Research. Netherlands: SLO
OECD (2012). PISA 2012 Assessment Framework Key competencies in reading,
mathematics
and
science.
[online].
Tersedia:http://
http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46962580.pdf [6 Januari 2014].
Setiadi, R. dan Agus, A. (2004). Dasar-Dasar Pemrograman Software
Pembelajaran. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia FPMIPA UPI
Show-Yu, L. (2009). Chemical Literacy and Learning Sources of Non-Science
Major Undergraduates on Understandings of Environmental Issues.
Chemical Education Journal (CED). 13, (1) Registration No 13-3.
Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., and Hofdtein, A.(2006). The Use of Scientific Literacy
Taxonomy for Assessing the Development of Chemical Literacy among
High-school Students. The Royal Society of Chemistry. Chemistry education
research and practice, 2006, 7(4), 203-225.
Siregar, N. (1998). Penelitian Kelas : Teori, Metodologi dan Analisis. Bandung:
IKIP bandung press.
Sitepu. (2012). Penulisan Buku Teks Pelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
SUCI MARYAM AZMIL, 2014
REKONSTRUKSI BAHAN AJAR IKATAN KIMIA MENGGUNAKAN KONTEKS KERAMIK UNTUK MENCAPAI
LITERASI SAINS SISWA SMAUniversitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu
|perpustakaan.upi.edu