Watershed management_Lecture 16-20

  M odu le 4 – ( L1 2 - L1 8 ) : “ W a t e r sh e d M ode lin g”

St a n da r d m ode lin g a ppr oa ch e s a n d cla ssifica t ion s, syst e m con ce pt St a n da r d m ode lin g a ppr oa ch e s a n d cla ssifica t ion s, syst e m con ce pt

for w a t e r sh e d m ode lin g, ove r a ll de scr ipt ion of diffe r e n t h ydr ologic

pr oce sse s, m ode lin g of r a in fa ll, r u n off pr oce ss, su bsu r fa ce flow s a n d gr ou n dw a t e r flow g

  H ydr ologic M ode lin g H ydr ologic M ode lin g 1 6 1 6

  L1 6 L1 6 L1 6 – L1 6 H ydr ologic M ode lin g H ydr ologic M ode lin g  

  Topics Cove r e d Topics Cove r e d  

  Rainfall runoff modeling, Runoff Rainfall runoff modeling, Runoff

  g, process, Physical modeling, process, Physical modeling, Distributed model Distributed model

  g,

    Rainfall runoff modeling, Rainfall runoff modeling,

  K K Keywords: Keywords: d d Physical modeling, distributed model. Physical modeling, distributed model.

  W a t e r sh e d M ode l Rainfall watershed

  I nterception ET

  ( Ba se d on : M cCu e n , 1 9 8 9 , & Ra j V ir Sin gh , 2 0 0 0 ) Surface storage

  Surface runoff Direct

  ET Infiltration runoff

  Interflow Percolation 0.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 12.00 15.00 D is c har ge( m 3 /s e c ) 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 R a in fa ll i n te rn s ity (m m /hr) GW Channel 200 400 600 Time(min) Rainfall Observed Simulated

  W a t e r sh e d m ode ls Rainf Channel flow al l

  

  Formulation

   

  Calibration Calibration

  Infiltration 

  Application

  Overland flow Interflow

   W a t e r sh e d m ode l con st it u t e s

  

  1. Input function

   

  2 Output function

  2. Output function

  

  3. Transform function

  Ph ysica lly ba se d w a t e r sh e d m ode ls Ph ysica lly ba se d w a t e r sh e d m ode ls  Overland flow 

  Channel flow Channel flow

  D e t e r m in ist ic H ydr ologic M ode l

  Three main categories: Lumped, Semi- distributed & Distributed

  

  Parameters do not vary spatially

  Lumped models:

  within the basin & response is evaluated only at the outlet, without explicitly accounting for the response outlet, without explicitly accounting for the response of individual subbasins.

  • – Parameters do not represent physical features of hydrologic processes; model parameters – area weighted hydrologic processes; model parameters – area weighted average
  • – Not applicable to event based processes
  • – Discharge prediction at outlet only Di h di ti t tl t l
  • – Simple & minimal data requirements, easy use
  • – Eg. SCS-CN based models; IHACRES, WATBAL etc. g

  D e t e r m in ist ic H ydr ologic M ode l..

  

Se m i – dist r ibu t e d m ode ls:: parameters are partially parameters are partially

  allowed to vary in space by dividing the basin into a allowed to vary in space by dividing the basin into a number of smaller subbasins number of smaller subbasins number of smaller subbasins number of smaller subbasins

    Mainly two types: Kinematic wave theory models (eg. Mainly two types: Kinematic wave theory models (eg.

  HEC HEC--HMS model) HMS model) -- simplified version of surface flow simplified version of surface flow equations of physically based model equations of physically based model

   

  Probability distributed models – Probability distributed models – spatial resolution is spatial resolution is accounted for by using probability distributions of input accounted for by using probability distributions of input accounted for by using probability distributions of input accounted for by using probability distributions of input parameters across the basin. parameters across the basin.

   

  Advantage: structure is more physically based than Advantage: structure is more physically based than lumped models lumped models l l d d d l d l

   

  Less demanding on input data than distributed models Less demanding on input data than distributed models

     

  Eg: SWMM, HEC HMS, TOPMODEL, SWAT etc. Eg: SWMM, HEC Eg: SWMM HEC--HMS TOPMODEL SWAT etc Eg: SWMM HEC HMS, TOPMODEL, SWAT etc. HMS TOPMODEL SWAT etc

  D e t e r m in ist ic H ydr ologic M ode l

  D ist r ibu t e d m ode ls: parameters are fully allowed to vary in space at a resolution chosen by the user.

   

  Attempts to incorporate data concerning the spatial Attempts to incorporate data concerning the spatial distribution of parameters variation together with computational algorithms

  

  Requires large amount of data l f d

   Governing physical processes are modeled in detail.  

  Results at any location & time Results at any location & time

  

  Highest accuracy in the rainfall-runoff modeling – if accurate data is available

  

  High computational time, Cumbersome, experts required

   Eg. HYDROTEL; MIKE11/SHE, WATFLOOD etc. Physically based Watershed Model… Ph ysica lly ba se d de t e r m in ist ic m ode ls: Ph i ll b d d i i i d l

  Aim: Gain better understanding of hydrologic

  p e o phenomena operating in a watershed and how changes e a ope a g a a e s ed a d o c a ges in watershed may affect these phenomena

  

  Complex processes  simplified by lumping process in space and time space and time

  

  Laws of Physics  Conservation of mass, momentum and energy

  

  Continuity equation, equation of motion, equation of energy

   

  One or more of these laws and several empirical One or more of these laws and several empirical relations are used in physical model development

  • – Models may be fully distributed or semi distributed.
Physically based Watershed Model… Scope of ph ysica l m ode lin g  Occurrence, movement,

  distribution and storage of water and their variability in space and time space and time

  Te ch n ology of Ph ysica l M ode lin g gy y g

  Hydrodynamic Models theoretical, physical based or hydraulic models. e.g Dynamic wave model for overland flow flow

  

  Overland / channel flow  By continuity equation and momentum equation

  

  Modeling: May be in 1D, 2D or 3D

  

  Based on requirements & data availability

  Ph ysica lly Ba se d Ph ysica lly Ba se d M ode l M ode l -- Flow Flow Equ a t ion s Equ a t ion s First proposed First p p proposed by p p by St y y St.. Venant Venant in in 1871 1871 based based on on fundamental laws fundamental laws of of continuity continuity & & conservation conservation of momentum of momentum Con t in u it y e qu a t ion Con t in u it y Con t in u it y e qu a t ion Con t in u it y e qu a t ion e qu a t ion M om e n t u m Equ a t ion M om e n t u m Equ a t ion

  De Saint-Venant (1797-1886) St. Venant Equations - Assumptions 

  Flow is one-dimensional

  

  Hydrostatic pressure prevails and Hydrostatic pressure prevails and vertical accelerations are negligible

  Discretization as Channel rectangular g network t k

   

  Streamline curvature is small Streamline curvature is small

  strips 1 in the 2 3 d watershe 2 1

  

  Bottom slope of the channel is small 3 4 4 4 Channel meeting

  Overland flow Single discretized point strip channel with

  

  Steady uniform flow equation such

  W L overland flow

  as Manning’s / Chezy equation can

  adding at channel

  be used to describe resistance be used to describe resistance

  nodes Overland flow

  effects

  Channel flow element element

    The fluid is incompressible The fluid is incompressible

  Terms in Momentum Equation

  2    

  1 1  

  1 1     Q Q Q Q y y

       g g ( S S ) o f

    At Ax Ax

    Loca l Con ve ct ive Pr e ssu r e Gr a vit y Fr ict ion a cce le r a t ion a cce le r a t ion for ce for ce for ce t e r m t e r m t e r m t e r m t e r m

   VVyVgg ( SS )  o f

    t t   x x   x x Kin e m a t ic W a ve D iffu sion W a ve D yn a m ic W a ve St. Venant Equations 

  Applica t ion s of diffe r e n t for m s of m om e n t u m e qu a t ionVVy

  V Vg gg g S SS S  ( ( ) ) o o f f

   txx

  Kin e m a t ic w a ve : when gravity forces and

  friction forces balance each other (steep slope channels with no back water effects)

   Diffusion wave: when pressure forces are

  important important in in addition addition to to gravity gravity and and frictional forces

   Dynamic wave: when both inertial and

  pressure forces f are important i t t and d backwater effects are not negligible (mild slope channels with downstream control) Overland Flow (St. Venant’s equations)  u hv hh

  

  Continuity equation:

  r    e rrf e i i x y t

  Where, h-depth of flow;   

  • infiltration re-excess rainfall (mm); f

  i  Momentum equations in 2-D u u u h u

      u v g g ( s s ) r

  

      

ox fx e

   txyx h

   vvvh v u v g g s s r

      (  )   oy fy e

   txyy h

  g-acceleration due to gravity; S -slope of watershed

  ox

  element in x-direction; S

  • slope in y-direction; S

  oy fx

  frictional slope in x-direction Overland Flow – Diffusion & Kinematic D iffu sion w a ve for m in 1 D

  α β-coefficients obtained

   Kin e m a t ic w a ve for m 1 D

    ; t x

      

  f S S re t h x q

  Boundary conditions

  

  Initial conditions

  

  3 

  q=0 at all nodal points

    h h u q

  5  

   h h u qt x

  Initial condition, t=0, h=0, ll d l

  

  α, β-coefficients obtained from Manning’s equation

    

     

        e r t h x q

  S S x h f

  

  Gov. Equation for Channel Flow

  Equation of continuity

  

QA

  q q

  x   t

  

  Momentum equation

  2  

  Q Q h

     gA gA S S S S gA gA

           f

       tx Ax  

   q-lateral inflow; Q-discharge in the channel;

  A-area of flow in the channel, S -bed slope; S S -friction slope of channel friction slope of channel.

  f f Channel Flow- Diffusion & Kinematic Kinematic  QA

  

  Diffusion

    q q    h hSS

   xt o f

   x

  Initial conditions

  1

  1

  2 2 / /

  3

  3

  1 1 / /

  2 

  2

  B Boundary conditions d diti

  QR S A h f n

    Kinematic: Kinematic:

   QA S =S

    q  f

   xt

  Use of N u m e r ica l Sim u la t ion M ode ls

  Hydrologic simulation models use mathematical equations to calculate results like runoff volume or equations to calculate results like runoff volume or peak flow

  

  Computer models allows parameter variation in space and time – with use of numerical methods and time with use of numerical methods

  

  Ease in simulation of complex rainfall patterns and heterogeneous watersheds

  

  Evaluation of various design controls and schemes

  

  Effective use of land use and land cover parameters

  

  Improves quality of modeling using spatial I li f d li i i l characteristics

  Examples of Hydrodynamic & Empirical Models Ph ysica l Pr oce ss H ydr odyn a m ic

M ode ls

Em pir ica l

M ode ls

  Surface runoff i. Kinematic ii. Diffusion i. Rational method ii. Unit Hydrograph iii. Dynamic iv. Conceptual models iii. SCS method Infiltration i. Richards equation ii. Kinematic

  G i. SCS method ii. SCS-CN C iii. Green-Ampt iv. Philip-two term iii. HEC iv. Algebraic Groundwater runoff i. Model based on i. Algebraic G ou d ate u o

  (Base flow)

ode based o

Groundwater flow equation geb a c e.g.Horton eqn. ii. Algebraic equations E t i ti i P M t lith i Bl iddl

  Evapotranspiration i. Penmann-Montelith i. Blaney criddle

  Ex a m ple s of H ydr odyn a m ic & Em pir ica l M ode ls M d l

Ph ysica l Pr oce ss H ydr odyn a m ic M ode ls Em pir ica l

i.

  Kinematic wave Flow over porous bed SCS model ii. Dynamic wave iii. iii.

  Volume balance Volume balance i. Kinematic Muskingum Flow in channel ii.

  

Diffusion

Hydrograph analysis Hydrograph analysis iii.

  

Dynamic

Solute transport Model p based on Algebraic g advection- dispersion Fickian

models

i.

  Sediment graph Sediment transport i. Kinematic models

ii. Dynamic ii.

  Regression iii. iii Einstein bed load Einstein bed load equation ti

  • Single Single--event model event model
  • Components Components : : overland runoff overland runoff , , channel channel routing etc. routing etc.

PSRM PSRM

  Overland Flow Overland Flow

  Conceptualized view of urban drainage system Conceptualized view of urban drainage system

  Developed for original application to the San Developed for original application to the San Francisco master drainage plan Francisco master drainage plan

  (Storage (Storage Treatment Treatment O l d Fl O l d Fl

  D l d f i i l li ti t th S D l d f i i l li ti t th S

  Simulations for both quality and quantity Simulations for both quality and quantity S Simulation imulation P Program rogram-- F Fortran) ortran)

  Continuous or Single Continuous or Single--event model by EPA event model by EPA

  ((H Hydrologic ydrologic S Simulation imulation

  H SPF H SPF

  ))

  ((P Penn enn S State tate R Runoff unoff M Model) odel)

  Limitation Limitation : Constant Outflow from detention facility : Constant Outflow from detention facility

  Routines for estimating detention storage volumes Routines for estimating detention storage volumes

  design rainstorm, layout of sewer network are inputs) design rainstorm, layout of sewer network are inputs)

  ILLinois inois U Urban rban D Drainage rainage A Area rea S Simulator) imulator)

  ((ILL

  Sizing of storm sewers (basin runoff characteristics, Sizing of storm sewers (basin runoff characteristics, design rainstorm layout of sewer network are inputs) design rainstorm layout of sewer network are inputs)

  ILLinois inois U Urban rban

  I LLUD AS ((ILL

  I LLUD AS

  H ydr ologic M ode ls H ydr ologic M ode ls

STORM STORM

STORM STORM

  Contd…. SW M M SW M M

  Routing for surface, subsurface and groundwater Routing for surface, subsurface and groundwater ((S Storm torm W Water ater M Management anagement M Model) odel)

  Fully dynamic hydraulic flow routing Fully dynamic hydraulic flow routing

  H EC H EC -- 1

1 H EC H EC-- H M S H M S

  DOS/ Window (difference between two models) DOS/ Window (difference between two models)

  • Including models like HEC Including models like HEC--1, TR 1, TR--55, TR 55, TR--20 etc. 20 etc.

  Calculates runoff hydrograph at each component Calculates runoff hydrograph at each component i e channels pumps conduits etc i e channels pumps conduits etc i.e. channels, pumps, conduits etc. i.e. channels, pumps, conduits etc.

  W M S W M S

  Provide the link between spatial terrain data (GIS) Provide the link between spatial terrain data (GIS) d h d l i d l d h d l i d l and hydrologic models and hydrologic models

  I H ACRES

  Si l ti f t fl f b i f i Si l ti f t fl f b i f i

  I H ACRES

  Simulation of stream flows from basins of various Simulation of stream flows from basins of various sizes sizes

  Unit hydrograph approach to lumped modeling Unit hydrograph approach to lumped modeling

  

Steps In Watershed Simulation Analysis

  Selection of model 

  I nput data collection: rainfall, infiltration, physiography, land use, channel characteristics etc 

  Evaluate the study objectives under various watershed simulation conditions simulation conditions 

  Selection of methods for obtaining basin hydrographs and channel routing channel routing 

  Calibration and verification of model 

  Model simulations for various conditions 

  Sensitivity analysis 

  Evaluate usefulness of model and comment on needed changes

  Ex: Overland flow model: Kinematic wave ( Got t a r di a n d V e n u t e lli 1 9 9 3 ; Ja be r a n d M oh t a r , 2 0 0 3 ; Re ddy model model e t a l. 2 0 0 7 ) :

  S f   n o

  5  

  5

3 Analytical solution for one-dimensional

  kinematic wave equations is given by time step 30 sec Kinematic wave model above equations (Jaber and Mohtar, 0 . 0 0 2 5 time step 180 sec Kinematic wave model i f i

  2003); t c is t im e of concent rat ion 2003) i 0 . 0 0 2 0 Analytical model ( sec) ; t r is rainfall durat ion ( sec) ; t f is m s e / / 3 ^ 0 . 0 0 1 5 c t he sim ulat ion t im e (sec); Lw is t he m o w lengt h of lengt h of w at ershed ( m ) in t he t e hed ( m ) in t he l n d f a l e r 0 . 0 0 1 0 direct ion of m ain slope. O 0 . 0 0 0 5 v

  400 m x 500 m, slope So = 0.0005, -1/3 0 . 0 0 0 0

Manning’s coefficient = 0 02 m Manning s coefficient = 0.02 m sec, sec 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 6 0 1 8 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 4 0 2 6 0 2 8 0 3 0 0 3 2 0

T i m e m i n ︵ ︶

  Ca se st u dy: Banaha Watershed

  (Venkata Reddy et al., 2007) (Venkata Reddy et al., 2007) Location- Chatra district in Jharkhand State, India

2 Area- 16.72 km ; Major Soil class – Sandy loam. j y

  Remotely Sensed Data- IRS1D LISSIII imagery of Jan. 1998 Thematic Maps- Drainage, Slope and LU/LC Map generation & analysis- ERDAS IMAGINE & ArcGIS S ope Slope map- ArcGIS; LU/LC map - ERDAS IMAGINE ap cG S; U/ C ap S G Manning’s roughness map- Based on LU/LC map Finite Element Grid map- ArcGIS; Grid map overlaid on slope & Manning s roughness maps overlaid on slope & Manning’s roughness maps Mean value of slope and Manning’s roughness- Each element of the grid; Nodal values- Average of adjacent element values of adjacent element values

  2 2 6

  6 Banaha Watershed : y Results and Discussion 

  Diffusion wave- Philip model

   

  Calibration - 4 Rainfall events Calibration - 4 Rainfall events

  

  Validation - 3 Rainfall events

  Calibrated parameters for rainfall events (Banha Watershed )

  

Results and Discussion

  9.00 12.00 15.00 m 3 /s e c ) 0.0 5.0 e rns it y r)

  0.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 D is c ha rg e( m 10.0 15.0 20.0 R a in fa ll in te (mm/ h r 60.00 200 400 600 Time(min) Rainfall Observed Simulated

  20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00

h

ar

ge

(m

3

/s

e

c

)

5 10 15 Rainfall 20 inf al l i n te n s it y (mm /h r) Observed Simulated Calibration event, July 24, 1996 Validation event, August 17, 1996 0.00 10.00 100 200 300 400 Time(min)

Di

s

c

h

25 30 Ra i

  Observed and simulated hydrographs of rainfall events (Banha), (Venkata Reddy et al., 2007)

  Validation event, August 17, 1996

  ( y , )

  Re fe r e n ce s Re fe r e n ce s Raj Vir Singh (2000), Watershed Planning and Management, Yash Publishing • House

  J.V.S Murthy (1991), Watershed Management, New Age international • Publications Publications 

  

Venkata Reddy K., Eldho T. I., Rao E.P. and Hengade N. (2007) “A kinematic

wave based distributed watershed model using FEM, GIS and remotely sensed

data.” Journal of Hydrological Processes, 21, 2765-2777

   Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R., and Mays, L.W. (1988). Applied Hydrology, McGraw- Chow V T Maidment D R and Mays L W (1988) Applied Hydrology McGraw Hill, Inc., New York.

   Bedient, P.B. and Huber W.C.(1988). Hydrology and flood plain analysis, Addison- Wesley Publishing Company., London

   Cunderlik, J. M. (2003). “Hydrologic model selection for the CFCAS project: Assessment of Water Resources Risk and Vulnerability to changing Climatic Conditions – Project Report 1”, Department of Civil and Environmental engineering, University of Western Ontario

   USEPA SWMM. June 2007. St orm Wat er Managem ent Model User’s Manual Version 5.0, EPA/600/R-05/040

   Mark, O., Weesakul, S., Apirumanekul, C., Aroonnet, S.B., Djordjevic, S. (2004).

  

“ Pot ent ial and lim it at ions of 1D m odeling of urban flooding ” J Hydrology 299 Pot ent ial and lim it at ions of 1D m odeling of urban flooding. J.Hydrology, 299,

284-299.

  Tu t or ia ls - Qu e st ion !.?.

   Illustrate various hydrological processes from rainfall to runoff in watershed based modeling.

    For a typical watershed, assess the important For a typical watershed, assess the important hydrological processes and discuss various hydrological processes and discuss various models available to analyze these processes. models available to analyze these processes models available to analyze these processes models available to analyze these processes.

  Describe the merits & demerits of each models. Describe the merits & demerits of each models.

   

For a selected watershed, how to find the runoff For a selected watershed, how to find the runoff

for a given rainfall event?. Illustrate with for a given rainfall event?. Illustrate with examples. examples.

  Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

  Se lf Eva lu a t ion - Qu e st ion s!. Q

  Describe different categories of deterministic hydrologic models?. hydrologic models?.

  

  What is the importance of physically based watershed modeling?.

  

  Describe the St. Venant equations with its b h h applications, assumptions and importance.

  

  Compare the following lumped, semi distributed and Compare the following lumped, semi distributed and distributed models: HEC-HMS; SWMM & MIKE 11 models. Discuss the applications, advantages & disadvantages of each model. disadvantages of each model

  Prof. T I Eldho, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay P f T I Eldh D t t f Ci il E i i

  IIT B b

  Assign m e n t - Qu e st ion s?. g Q

  Differentiate between lumped, semi distributed and distributed models used in hydrologic modeling. distributed models used in hydrologic modeling.

   How physically based watershed modeling is done?.

  Illustrate the step by step procedure. What are advantages & limitations. advantages & limitations

  

  What are the important steps in the watershed simulation analysis?.

  

  Illustrate various types of hydrodynamic & empirical models used in hydrology.

  Un solve d Pr oble m !. Un solve d Pr oble m !.

    For your watershed area, discuss the For your watershed area, discuss the possibility of applying a physically based possibility of applying a physically based

model for runoff/ flood analysis. Identify the model for runoff/ flood analysis. Identify the d l f d l f ff/ fl ff/ fl d d l l i Id i Id tif th tif th

data required for physical modeling. data required for physical modeling.

  Develop a conceptual model by giving the Develop a conceptual model by giving the Develop a conceptual model by giving the Develop a conceptual model by giving the detailed steps for rainfall runoff modeling. detailed steps for rainfall runoff modeling.

    Identify how to model evapo--transpiration, Identify how to model evapo transpiration, interception & infiltration for the area considered. interception & infiltration for the area considered.

  With respect to available data, choose specific With respect to available data, choose specific models to model these processes. models to model these processes. models to model these processes. models to model these processes.

   

  Discuss how to add these processes in the rainfall-- Discuss how to add these processes in the rainfall runoff modeling. runoff modeling.

  Dr. T. I. Eldho Dr. T. I. Eldho Professor, Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, p p g g g g Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India, 400 076. Mumbai, India, 400 076. Email: Email: Email: Email: eldho@iitb.ac.in eldho@iitb.ac.in eldho@iitb.ac.in eldho@iitb.ac.in