IN PRESENT PERFECT TENSE MADE BY SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF

COMMON ERRORS

  IN PRESENT PERFECT TENSE MADE BY SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMPN

11 SURABAYA A THESIS

  In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Language Teaching

  Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Fakultas Pendidikan

  

APPROVAL SHEET

This t h e s i s e n t i t l e d COMMON ERRORS I N PERFECT TENSE MADE BY SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF

  11

  and p r e p a r e d and s u b m i t t e d

  E s t h e r T i s n a w a t i

  has been and a c c e p t e d as a p a r t i a l f u l f i l m e n t o f t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s t h e P e n d i d i k a n Degree i n E n g l i s h Language Teaching by t h e f o l l o w i n g a d v i s o r .

  F i r s t

  SHEET T h i s t h e s i s has been examined t h e Committee on O r a l E x a m i n a t i o n w i t h a g r a d e o f B on December

  22 ,

  1992 D r s . S t e f a n u s Laga

  

Chairman

D r s _______- ____- _- - ___- - - - -

  Member ......................... Member Hendra T e d ___________- - - - - ___- - - - -

  Member P r i Member

  • Dean o f H e a d o f

  would l i k e t o thank God f o r a l l H i s b l e s s i n g s and

  I

  t h e o p p o r t u n i t y has g i v e n me f o r f i n i s h i n g my s t u d y Mandala C a t h o l i c U n i v e r s i t y . deepest e x p r e s s i o n o f g r a t i t u t e a l s o goes t o :

  D r s . Ngadiman, my f i r s t t h e s i s w r i t i n g a d v i - 1. s o r , who gave i n v a l u a b l e s u g g e s t i o n , encouragement and g u i d i n g i n i m p r o v i n g t h i s t h e s i s .

2. The Head o f t h e E n g l i s h Department who had a l l o w e d me t o f i n i s h t h i s t h e s i s .

  The Headmaster and t h e E n g l i s h o f SMPN Surabaya, who had a l l o w e d t o c o n d u c t t h i s t h e s i s a t t h e s c h o o l .

  4. The second y e a r s t u d e n t s o f SMPN 11 Surabaya b e l o n g i n g

  • 1991 s c h o o l y e a r . who had p a r t i c i p a t e d i n h e l p i n g me c o l l e c t t h e d a t a f o r t h i s t h e s i s .

  F i n a l l y , would a l s o t o e x p r e s s my t h a n k f u l - ness t o my b e l o v e d f a m i l y and f r i e n d s f o r t h e i r s u p p o r t h e l p d u r i n g t h i s t h e s i s w r i t i n g .

  T A B L E OF CONTENTS SHEET

  i

  APPROVAL SHEET

  i i

  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

  iii

  T A B L E O F CONTENTS

  i v

  ABSTRACT v

  I :

  I N T R O D U C T I O N

  1.1 B a c k g r o u n d o f t h e S t u d y S t a t e m e n t o f t h e P r o b l e m s T h e O b j e c t i v e o f the S t u d y

  1.3

  1 . 4 T h e S i g n i f i c a n c e o f t h e S t u d y

  1 . 5 S c o p e and L i m i t a t i o n o f t h e S t u d y

  1.6 T h e T h e o r e t i c a l F r a m e w o r k 1 . 7 A s s u m p t i o n

  .......................

  1.8 D e f i n i t i o n o f K e y T e r m s ..........

  1.9 O r g a n i z a t i o n o f t h e T h e s i s .......

  CHAPTER : R E V I E W O F THE R E L A T E D L I T E R A T U R E E r r o r A n a l y s i s ...................

  V e r s u s M i s t a k e s

  2.1.1 E r r o r s

  T y p e s o f E r r o r s

  2.1.2

  2.1.3 T h e S o u r c e o f E r r o r s

  2.3 The D i f f e r e n c e Between E n g l i s h and I n d o n e s i a n Language i n C o n s t r u c t i n g P r e s e n t P e r f e c t Tense

  23

  5.1 Summary and C o n c l u s i o n 4 9

  4.3 I n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h e F i n d i n g 4 7 CHAPTER V : CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

  4.2 The P o s s i b l e Sources o f E r r o r s ...

  38

  I V : FINDINGS AND 38 4 . 1 The F i n d i n g

  CHAPTER

  . . . . . .

  36 3 . 5 Technique f o r Data 2a

  3 4

  33

  3.2 The S u b j e c t o f t h e S t u d y

  3.1 Research Design

  33

  RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  CHAPTER :

  2.4.3 Adverb o f Time i n P r e s e n t P e r f e c t Tense

  28

  2.4.2 The Use ( F u n c t i o n )

  25

  2.4.1 The Form (Usage)

  25

  2.4 The E n g l i s h P r e s e n t P e r f e c t Tense

3.3 The I n s t r u m e n t o f t h e Research . . .

3.4 P r o c e d u r e o f C o l l e c t i n g t h e Data .

5.2 S u g g e s t i o n s

  

COMMON ERRORS I N PRESENT PERFECT TENSE

BY SECOND YEAR STUDENTS O F SMPN

11 By E s t h e r T i s n a w a t i e

  A c c o r d i n g t o t h e 1984 E n g l i s h C u r r i c u l u m f o r SMP, t h e P r e s e n t P e r f e c t Tense i s one o f t h e sub t o p i c s o f E n g l i s h t h a t t h e second y e a r s t u d e n t s o f s h o u l d mas- t e r . A l t h o u g h t h e s t u d e n t s have l e a r n t t e n s e s such as S i m p l e P r e s e n t Tense, P r e s e n t C o n t i n u o u s Tense, S i m p l e P a s t Tense and P r e s e n t P e r f e c t Tense, t h e y s t i l l g e t d i f f i c u l t i e s i n c o n s t r u c t i n g p r e s e n t p e r f e c t sentences. Based on t h e f a c t , t h e w r i t e r i s i n t e r e s t e d i n c o n d u c t i n g a r e s e a r c h on i t , e s p e c i a l l y i n d e s c r i b i n g t h e t y p e s o f e r r o r s .

  The purpose o f t h i s r e s e a r c h was t o i n v e s t i g a t e t h e t y p e s o f e r r o r made by t h e second y e a r s t u d e n t s o f SMPN

  11 Surabaya i n c o n s t r u c t i n g p r e s e n t p e r f e c t t e n s e sentences.

  The s t a t e m e n t problems a r e what k i n d s e r r o r s do t h e second y e a r s t u d e n t s make when c o n s t r u c t i n g E n g l i s h s e n t e n c e s " . What a r e t h e p o s s i b l e s o u r c e s o f e r r o r s .

  The t r y - o u t t e s t was c a r r i e d o u t t o c l a s s H o f t h e second y e a r s t u d e n t s o f SMPN Surabaya on F e b r u a r y The r e l i a b i l i t y o f t h e i n s t r u m e n t was t e s t e d 1992. u s i n g t h e Kuder and R i c h a r d s o n The r e l i a b i l i t y t h e t e s t was

  The r e l i a b i l i t y o f t h e t r y - o u t was The r e l i - a b i l i t y c o e f f i c i e n t o f a t e s t can v a r y between and r e l i a b i l i t y o f 1.00 i n d i c a t e s t h a t a t e s t i s p e r f e c t l y r e l i a b l e . The r e l i a b i l i t y o f t h e t r y - o u t was i t was v e r y adequate t o a c c e p t i t . The w r i t e r c a r r i e d o u t t o f o u r c l a s s e s : and G o f t h e second year s t u d e n t s o f SMPN Surabaya as t h e r e a l t e s t .

11 Having analyzed. c l a s s i f i e d , and counted t h e e r r o r s

  e n c o u n t e r e d , t h e w r i t e r found o u t t h e most e r r o r t y p e s t h a t t h e s t u d e n t s made were e r r o r s o f m i s f o r m a t i o n

  ( = t h e second most e r r o r t y p e s were e r r o r s o f

  o m i s s i o n 1 1 . 4 8 % ) . t h e t h i r d e r r o r t y p e s were e r r o r s o f a d d i t i o n 9 . 6 7 % ) and t h e f o u r t h e r r o r t y p e s were e r r o r s There a r e t h r e e reasons why t h e s t u d e n t s make e r r o r s : t h e s t r u c t u r a l o f I n d o n e s i a n language i s t e n d t o t r a n s f e r t h e meaning and d i s t r i b u t i o n o f forms t o t h e f o r e i g n language T r a n s f e r ) ; t h e s t u d e n t s ' mother-tongue i n t e r f e r e t o t h e i r f o r e i g n language T r a n s f e r ) .

  I n l i n e w i t h t h e f i n d i n g , t h e w r i t e r concluded t h a t i n c o n s t r u c t i n g t h e p r e s e n t p e r f e c t tense most s t u d e n t s made m i s f o r m a t i o n e r r o r s . H o p e f u l l y , t h e f i n d i n g s o f t h i s s t u d y w i l l g i v e us b e t t e r i n f o r m a t i o n about t h e s t u d e n t s l e a r n t h e p r e s e n t p e r f e c t

Dokumen yang terkait

AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE PARAGRAPH MADE BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 06 DAU MALANG

44 306 18

AN ANALYSIS OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND SYNTACTIC ERRORS IN WRITING MADE BY ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSE STUDENTS OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG UNIVERSITY IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2015/2016

0 4 20

TENSE PROBLEMS IN TRANSLATING ENGLISH INTO INDONESIAN TEXT MADE BY TRANSLATION STUDENTS AT UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG

0 5 18

ERRORS MADE BY SECOND YEAR STUDENTS IN LEARNING CONDITIONAL SENTENCES AT MAN 1 MALANG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2012/2013

0 5 19

THE ANALYSIS OF SYNTACTICAL ERRORS MADE BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF MAN 2 JEMBER IN THE 2004/2005 ACADEMIC YEAR IN WRITING A DESCRIPTIVE PARAGRAPH

0 2 5

SIMPLE PAST TENSE ERRORS IN RECOUNT TEXT MADE BY THE THIRD GRADE STUDENTS OF SMAN 1 PRINGSEWU

0 32 63

AN ERROR ANALYSIS OF USING SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE IN DESCRIPTIVE WRITING OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA 1 GEBOG KUDUS IN ACADEMIC YEAR 20132014 By SITI ARI LESTIANI NIM 2010-32-222

0 0 18

THE ERROR ANALYSIS OF USING FUTURE SIMPLE IN THE SENTENCE MADE BY THE SECOND YEAR SENIOR ISLAMIC HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS (MA) AL-BIDAYAH CANDI AMBARAWA IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2003/2004 - Test Repository

0 0 111

THE DIFFICULTIES IN COMPREHENDING TEXTS ADOPTED FROM HELLO MAGAZINE FACED BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMK DIPONEGORO SALATIGA IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2005 2006

0 0 66

THE TRANSLATION PROBLEM ON PRESENT PERFECT TENSE INTO INDONESIAN LANGUAGE BY THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF SMK MUHAMMADIYAH 2 BOROBUDUR IN ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2006/2007 - Test Repository

0 0 73