T IPA 1402436 Bibliography
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acar, O. & Patton, B. R. (2012). Argumetation and formal reasoning skills in
argumentation-based guided inquiry course. Procedia Social and
Behavioral Sciences. 46 (12), hlm. 4756-4760.
Achmad, R. (2004). Kimia lingkungan. Yogyakarta: Andi Press.
Akinoglu, O. &Tandogan, R. O. (2007). The effects of problem-based active
learning in science education on student’s academic achievement, attitude
and concept learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and
Technology Education, 6, hlm. 1205-1209.
Arifin, M. (1984). Pengembangan program pengajaranbidangstudikimia.
Surabaya: Airlangga Press.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Statistikkonsepdasardanaplikasinya. Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Arimbawa,P.,
Saida,
I.W.,
&Tika,I.N.
(2013)
Pengaruh
model
pembelajaranberbasisproyekterhadapkemampuanpemecahanmasalah IPA
sehari-hariditinjaudarimotivasiberprestasisiswa.
E-Journal
Program
PascasarjanaUniversitasPendidikanGanesha, 3 (1),hlm.83-87.
Arends, R. I. (2009). Learning to teach. United States of America : The McGrawHill Companies, Inc.
Arnyana,
I.B.P.
(2007).
Penerapanmodel
PBLpadapelajaranbiologiuntukmeningkatkankompetensidankemampuanbe
rpikirkritissiswakelasX
SMAN
1
Singarajatahunpelajaran
2006/2007.JurnalPendidikandanPengajaranUndiksa, 2 (2), hlm. 61-65.
Bao, L. (2009). Learning and scientific reasoning. International Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education, 8 (5), hlm. 323-331.
Bekiroglu, F. O. &Eskin, H. (2012). Examination of the relationship between
engagement in scientific argumentation and conceptual knowledge.
International Journal of science and Mathematics Education, 10, hlm.
1415-1443.
Berland, L. K.& Hammer, D. (2011). Framing of scientific argumentation.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8 (3), hlm 114-118.
Bilgin, I., Senocak, E. &Sosbilir, M. (2009). The effects of probem based learning
instruction on university student’ performance of conceptual and
104
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
105
quantitative problems in gas concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,
Sains& Technology Education, 5 (2), hlm. 153-164.
Bottcher, F. &Meisert, A. (2011). Argumentation in science education: a modelbased framework. Journal of science and Education, 20, hlm. 102-140.
Brown, N. J. S. (2010). The evidence- based reasoning framework: assessig
scientific reasoning. Educational Assesssment, 15, hlm. 123-141.
Cetin, P. S., Dogan, N., &Kutluca, A. Y. (2014). The quality of pre-service
science teachers’ argumantion: Influence of content knowledge. Journal of
Science Teacher Education, 25, hlm. 309-331.
Chen, C. T. & She, H. C. (2014). The effectiveness of scientific inquiry
with/without integration of scientific reasoning. International Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education, 14 (7), hlm. 511-516.
Choi, A., Hand, B. & Norton-Meier, L. (2013). Grade 5 student’s online
argumentation about their in-class inquiry investigations. Research Science
Education, 43 (5), hlm 724-738.
Christenson, N. (2012). Using the see-sep model to analyze upper secondary
student’s use of
supporting reasons in arguing socioscientific
issues.Journal Science Education Technology, 21 (3), hlm. 342-347.
Coladarci, T., Cobb, C. D., Minium, E.W. & Clarke, R.B. (2011). Fundamental of
statistical reasoning in education. United States of America : Wiley.
Copi, I.M. & Cohen, C. (1990). Introduction to logic. New York: Macmillan
Publishing Company.
Dahar, R.W. (2011). Teori-teoribelajardanpembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Dawson, V. &Venville, G. J. (2009). High-school students’ informal reasoning
and argumentation about biotechnology: an indicator of scientific
literacy?.International Journal of Science Education, 3 (11), hlm. 14211445.
Dawson, V. M, &Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing
students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school
genetic. Research in Science Education, 40, hlm. 133-148.
De Graaff, E. &Kolmos, A. (2003). Characteristic of problem based learnig.
Research in Science Education, 19 (5), hlm. 657-662
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
106
Depdiknas. (2008). Pengembangan model pendidikankecakapanhidup. [Online].
Diaksesdari http://www.puskur.net
Depdiknas. (2013). Permendikbud No. 68 tahun 2013 tentangKurikulum 2013.
Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Ding, L., Wei, X.& Mollohan, K. (2014). Does higher education improve student
scientific reasoning skill?.International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 14 (5), hlm. 383-386.
Dolan, E & Grady, J. (2010). Recognizing students’ scientific reasoning: a tool for
categorizing complexity of reasoning during teaching by inquiry. Journal
of Science Teacher Education, 21, hlm. 31-55.
Dunbar, K. N. &Klahr, D. (2012). The oxford handbook of thinking and
reasoning. USA: Oxford University Press.
Duschl, R. A. (2007). Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria. Science &
Technology Education Library, 35, hlm. 159-175.
Eggen&Kauchak. (2012). Strategidanmodel pembelajaran. Jakarta :Indeks
Erduran, S., Ardac, D., &Yakmaci-Guzel, B. (2006). Learning to teach
argumentation: case studies of pre-service secondary science teacher.
Eurasia Journal of Mathematic Science and Technology Education, 2 (2),
hlm.1-14.
Erduran, S.&Jimenez, A. M. (2011). Argumentation in science education. Science
& Technology Education Library, 39 (1),hlm. 158-173.
Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y. & Park, J. Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in
science education. International Journal of STEM Education, 2 (1), hlm.
81-86.
Feierabend, T. (2012). Two approaches for analyzing students’ competence of
evaluation in group discussions about climate change.International
Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7 (4), 581-598.
Foong, C. C. &Daeniel, E. G. S. (2010). Assesing students’ argumentation made
in sosio-scientific contexts: the considerations of structural complexity and
the depth of content knowledge. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science,
9, hlm. 1120-1127.
Fraenkel, J.R. &Wallen, N.E. (2007). How to design and evaluate research in
education. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
107
Frosch, C. A. (2015). Understanding the role of reasoning ability in mathematical
achievement.
[Online].
Diaksesdarihttp://ceur-ws.org/Vol1419/paper0105.pdf.
Frutak, E. M. (2008). A framework for analyzing reasoning in science classroom
discourse: paperpresented at the annual meeting of the American.
Educational Research Association, 14 (1), hlm. 39-44.
Gallagher, S. (1995). Implementing problem based learning in science classrooms.
School Science and Mathematics, 95 (3), hlm. 136-146
Gracia-Mila, M., Gilabert, S., Erduran, S., Feltton, M. (2013). The effect of
argumentative task goal on the quality of argumentative discourse.
Research in Science Education, 97 (4), hlm. 497-523
Gulo, W. (2002).Strategibelajarmengajar. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Gurlen, E. (2011). Problem the effect of problem based learning on learning
outcomes, problem solving skillsand selfefficacy belief. Journal of
Education, 5 (2), hlm. 62-63.
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/ gain score. United States of America:
Indiana University.
Hakyolu, H. &Bekiroglu, F. O. (2011). Assesment of students science knowledge
levels and involvement with argumentation. International Journal for
Cross-Disciplinary Subject in Education, 2 (1), hlm. 346-354.
Hamdayana, (2014). Model danmetodepembelajarankreatifdanberkarakter.
Bogor: Ghilia Indonesia.
Han, J.(2013). Scientific reasoning: research, development, assessment.
(Dissertation), The Ohio State University.
Hartati, R. (2015). Implementasi model problem based learning (PBL)
padapembelajaranipaterpaduuntukmeningkatkanliterasisainsdankemamp
uanberpikirkritissiswakelasVII
SMP
padamateripencemaranlingkungan.(Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana,
UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Herawati,
D.
(2015).
Penalaranilmiahsiswapadasekolahmultinasionaldansekolahberorientasil
ingkungan.
(Tesis).SekolahPascasarjana,
UniversitasPendidikan
Indonesia, Bandung.
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
108
Herman,
T.
(2007).
Pembelajaranberbasismasalahuntukmeningkatkankemampuanberpikirm
atematistingkattinggisiswasekolahmenengahpertama.
(Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Hmelo, C. & Silver. (2004). Problem based learning: what and how do students
learn?.Educational Psychology Review, 16 (3), hlm. 235-262.
Holil,
Anwar.
(2009).
Hakikatpembelajaran
IPA2.
Online.
Diaksesdarihttp://anwarholil.blogspot.com/2009/01/hakikat-pembelajaranipa.html.
Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatansaintifikdankontekstualdalampembelajaranabad
21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Hudoyo, H. (1979). Pengembangankurikulummatematika&pelaksanaannya di
depankelas. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
Hutapea,
N.
M.
(2013).
Peningkatankemampuanpenalaran,
komunikasimatematisdankemandirianbelajarsiswa
SMA
melaluipembelajarangeneratif.
(Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana,
UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Inch, E. S. (2006). Critical thinking and communication: the use of reason in
argument. Boston: Pearson Education.
Indrawati, (2000). Keterampilan proses sains. Bandung: PustakaRekaCipta.
Irwan,
Z.
D.
(1996).
Prinsip-prinsipekologi,
lingkungandanpelestariannya. Jakarta: BumiAksara.
ekosistem,
Jalaludin,
D.
(2009).
Penggunaan
model
pembelajaranberbasismasalahdenganpendekataninkuiriterbimbinguntukm
eningkatkanpenguasaankonseplistrikdinamisdankecakapanilmiahsiswadidi
k SMA. (Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia,
Bandung.
Jasin, M. (2011). Ilmualamiahdasar. Jakarta: Grafindo.
Jufri, W. (2013). Belajardanpembelajaransains. Bandung: PustakaRekaCipta
Juliawan,
D.
(2012).
Pengaruh
model
pembelajaranberbasismasalahterhadappemahamankonsepdanketerampilan
proses
sainssiswakelasXI
SMA
N
2
Kutatahunpelajaran
2011/2012.JurnalKependidikan, 42 (3), hlm. 192-195.
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
109
Johnson , E. B. (2010). Contextual teaching learning. Bandung: Kaifa.
Joko, S. (2012). Keefektifan model pembelajarankontekstualdenganpendekatan
open
ended
dalamaspekpenalarandanpemecahanmasalahpadamaterisegitiga di kelas
VII.
[Online].
Diaksesdarihttp//ejournal.upgrismg.ac.id/index.php/malihpeddas/article/view/64.
Kaya, E., Erdurn, S. & Cetin, P. S. (2010). High school students’ perception of
argumentation.Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 2, hlm. 39713975.
Kemendikbud.
(2013).
Permendikbud
No.
81
A
tahun
2013
tentangpanduanpengembanganpembelajarankurikulum 2013. Jakarta:
DirektoratPembinaanSekolahmenengah Pertama.
Keskin, S. C. (2013). Student cognitive awareness about of reasons of
environmental problems. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28 (3), hlm.
378-381.
Klegeris, A. (2011).Impact of problem based learning in a large classroom setting:
student perception and problem solving skills.Procedia Social and
Behavioral Science, 7 (4), hlm. 437-445.
Koenenman , M., Goedhart, M. &Ossevoort, M. (2013). Introducing preuniversity students to primary scientific literatur through argumentation
analysis. Research Science Education, 43 (9), hlm. 2009-2034
Koenig, K., Schen. M.&Bao, L. (2012). Explicitly targeting pre-service teacher
scientific reasoning abilities and understanding of nature of science
through an introductory science cource.Winter, 21 (2), hlm. 58-62
Konstantinidou, A. &Macagno, F. (2013). Understaning students’ reasoning:
argumentation schemes as an interpretation method in science education.
Science & Education, 22, hlm. 1069-1087.
Kulatunga, U., Moog, R. S. & Lewis, J. E. (2013). Argumentation and
participation patterns in general chemistry peer-led sessions. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching,50 (10), hlm. 1207-123.
Kuhn,D., &Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. World Applied
Sciences Journal, 18 (5), hlm. 1245-1260.
Kurniawati, R. (2013). Meningkatkankemampuanberpikirkritismatematiksiswa
SMA melalui model pembelajaranmissouri mathematics project:
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
110
studikuasieksperimenterhadapsiswakelas X SMA N 11 Bandung, (Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Kusumaningsih,
D.
(2011).
Upayameningkatkankemampuanberpikirkritissiswakelas X-C SMA N 11
Yogyakarta melaluipembelajaranmatematikaperbandingantrigonometri.
[Online].
Diaksesdari
http//core.kmi.open.ac.uk/download/pdf/11859973.pdf.
Kuslan, L. &Stone,A. H. (1969). Teaching children science: an inquryapproachs.
California: Publishing Company, Inc.
Lawson, A. E. (2004). The nature and development of scientific reasoning: a
synthetic view. International Journal of Science and Mathematic
Education, 2, hlm. 307-338.
Lazonder, A. W.&Drost, S. W. (2014). Advancing scientific reasoning in upper
elementary classrooms: direct instruction versus task structuring. Journal
of Science Education and Technology, 15 (2), hlm 109-113.
Lee, C. Q.& She, H. C. (2010). Facilitating students’ conceptual change and
scientific reasoning involving the unit of combustion. Research in Science
Education, 40, hlm. 479-504.
Liliasari&Trawil,
M.
Berpikirkompleksdanimplementasidalampembelajaran
UNM
IPA.
2013.
Makasar:
Lohman, M. & Finkelstein, M. (2002). Designing case in problem based learning
to foster problem solving skill. European Journal of Dental Education, 6
(2), hlm. 121-127.
Lyle, K. & Robinson, W. (2001). Teaching science problem solving: an overview
of experimental work.Journal of Chemical Eduction, 78 (9), hlm. 11621165.
Majid, A. (2014). Implementasikurikulum 2013: Kajianteoritisdanpraktis.
Bandung: Interes.
Manurung, S. R. (2013). Pengembangan model pembelajarandengan media
hiperteksberdasarkanskemapemecahanmasalahberintikanargumentasitoul
min:
suatustudipenerapanpada
topic
kinematika.
(Disertasi).
SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
McDermott, L.C. (1996). Physics by inquiry. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
111
Mercier, H.&heintz, C. (2014). Scientist’s argumentatif reasoning. Spinger
Science and Business Media, 33, hlm. 513-524.
Muhson,
A.
(2009).Peningkatanminatbelajardanpemahamanmahasiswamelaluipenerap
an problem based learning.JurnalKependidikan, 39(2),hlm. 171-182.
Mujiyanto.
(2012).
Pengaruh
model
blended
learning
terhadappemahamankonsepditinjaudaripenalaran formal siswakelas X
SMAN
1
Balikpapan.
[Online].
Diaksesdarihttp://karyailmiah.um.ac.id/index.php/disertasi/article/view/22
821.
Mulyasa, A. (2010). Model pembelajaraninkuiridenganmenggunakan virtual
laboratory
dan
real
laboratory
untukmeningkatkanpenguasaankonsepdankemampuanpenalaransiswasma
padatopiklistrikdinamis.
(Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana,
UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Muslim.
(2014).
Pengembanganprogram
perkuliahanfisikasekolahberorientasikemampuanberargumentasicalon
guru fisika. (Disertasi). UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Mustafa,
S.
P.
(2013).
Pengaruhmodel
pembelajarangeneratifterhadapkemampuan pemecahan masalah dan
penalaransiswa. (Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan
Indonesia, Bandung.
National Research Council.(1996). National science education standards.
Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
Newman, M. J. (2011). Problem based learning: an introduction and overview of
the key feature of the approach. Journal of Veterinary, 23 (3), hlm. 12-20.
Nurdini,
S.
(2013).
Pengaruhpembelajaranberbasismasalahterhadapkemampuanpemecahanm
asalahdanketerampilan proses IPA siswapadasistemekskresi. (Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikanIndnesia, Bandung.
Nuryanti,P.(2010).
Pengaruh
model
pembelajaranberbasispraktikumterhadapketerampilan
proses
sains,
sikapilmiahdanpenguasaankonsepsistemregulasi.
(Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Novianawati.
(2015).
Pengembanganpenalaranilmiahpadapembelajaranipaterpadudenganmengg
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
112
unakan model levels of inquiry. JurnalPendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4 (1),
hlm. 19 – 25.
Osborne, J.(2001). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. School
Science Review, 41 (10), hlm. 994-1020.
Redhana,
I.
W.
(2012).Modelpembelajaranberbasismasalahdanpertanyaansocratikuntukme
ningkatkanketerampilanberpikirkritissiswa. JurnalCakrawalaPendidikan,
3 (1), hlm. 13-17.
Redjeki, S. (2014). Model-model pembelajaran yang mendukungkurikulum2013.
Makalah.UniversitasKuningan.
Roshayanti,
F.
(2012).Pengembangan
model
asesmenargumentatifuntukmengukurketerampilanargumentasimahasiswap
adakonsepfisiologimanusia.JurnalCakrawalaPendidikan, 3 (2), hlm. 6368.
Rusmono. (2014). Strategipembelajarandenganproblem based learning ituperlu.
untukmeningkatkanprofesionalitas guru. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Rustaman, N. Y. (2007). Assesmendalampembelajaransains. Bandung: UPI.
Rutherford, F. J. &Ahlgren, A., (1990). Science for all Americans. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Sadia, I. W. (2007). Pengembangankemampuanberpikir formal siswaSMA
melaluipenerapan model pembelajaran “problem based learning” dan
“cycle learning” dalampembelajaranfisika.
JurnalPendidikandanPengajaranUndiksha, 1, hlm. 1-2.
Sani, R. A. (2014). Pembelajaransaintifikuntukimplementasikurikulum2013.
Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategipembelajaranberorientasistandar proses pendidikan.
Bandung: KencanaPrenada Media Group.
Santrock, J. W. (2013).Children. New York: The Mc-Graw Hill Companies, Inc
Simosi, M. (2003). Using toulmin’s framework for the analysis of everyday
argumentation: some methodological considerations. Journal of
Veterinary, 15 (4), hlm. 185-202.
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
113
Sitohang,
K.,
Rima,
F.,
Molan,
B.
(2012).
thingkingmembangunpemikiranlogis. Jakarta: SinarHarapan.
Critical
Sitorus,
A.
(2011).
PeningkatankemampuanpenalarandanpemecahanmasalahsiswaSMA
menggunakanstrategipembelajaranpeningkatankemampuanberpikir.[Onlin
e]. Diaksesdari http//diglib.unnimed.ac.id/bookmark/1334/senior.
Slameto. (2010). Belajardanfaktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jakarta:
Rinekacipta.
Sprod, T. (1998). “I can change your opinion on that”: social constructivist whole
class discussions and their effect on scientific reasoning. Research in
Science Education, 28 (4), hlm. 463-480.
Sudjana. (2005). Metodastatistik. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sugiyono. (2013) Metodepenelitianpendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Suharnan.
(2012).
Penerapanpendekatanklasifikasiuntukmeningkatkanpengetahuankonsepdu
niatumbuhandanpenalaransiswa SMA berdasarkan gender.(Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Sund R. R. &Trowbrbge, L. W. (1973). Teaching science by inquiry in the
secondary school, 22nd ed. Ohio: Merill Pub. Howell Company.
Sunu. (2001). MelindungilingkungandenganmenerapkanISO. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Suparno, P. (2001). Teoriperkembangankognitif jean piaget. Yogjakarta
:Kanisius.
Surapranata. S. (2009). Analisis, validitas, reliabilitas dan interpretasi hasil tes.
Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Sutopo&Waldrip, B. (2014). Impact of a representational approach on students’
reasoning and conceptual understanding in learning mechanics.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12 (7), hlm.
741-765.
Tarigan,
E.
A.
(2015).
Penerapan
PBL
berbasismetodepraktikumterhadappenguasaankonsepdankemampuanargu
mentasitertulissiswapadamateriinteraksimahlukhidupdenganlingkunganny
a.(Tesis). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia,
Bandung.
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
114
Tatar, E. &Oktaym, M. (2011). The effectiveness of problem based learning on
teaching the first law of thermodynamics.Research in Science and
Technological Education. 29(3), hlm. 315-332.
Tjasyono, B. (2004). Klimatologi. Bandung:ITB.
Tosun, C. &Taskesenligil,Y. (2011). The effect of problem based learning on
student motivation towards chemistry classes and on learning
strategies.Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9 (1), hlm. 126-131.
Trianto.
(2014).
Model
pembelajaranterpadu,
konsep,
danimplementasinyadalamkurikulumtingkatsatuanpendidikan
Jakarta : PT BumiAksara.
strategi,
(KTSP).
Toharudin, U. (2011). Membangunliterasisains. Bandung:Humaniora
Tytler, R., Haslam, F., Prain, V.&Hubber, P. (2009). An explicit representational
focus for teaching and learning about animals in the environment.
Teaching Science, 55(4), hlm. 21-27.
Tytler, R.& Peterson, S. (2003). Tracing young children’s scientific reasoning.
Research in Science Education, 33 (3), hlm. 433-465.
Varma, K. (2014). Supporting scientific experimentation and reasoning in young
elementay school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology,
23,hlm. 381-397.
Vasconcelos, C. (2010). Teaching environmental education through PBL:
evaluation of a teaching intervention program. Research Science
Education, 40 (1), hlm. 219-232.
Verheij,
B.
(2005). Evaluating argument
based
scheme.Argumentation Journal, 19, hlm. 347-371
on
Toulmin’s
Waldrip, B. (2012). Reasoning through representing in school science. Teaching
Science, 58 (1), hlm. 14-18.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V.&Sellings, P. (2013). Explaining Newton’s Laws of motion:
using student reasoning through representation to develop conceptual
understanding. Instructional Science, 41, hlm. 165-189.
Widodo,
L.
W.
(2013).
Peningkatanaktivitasbelajardanhasilbelajarpesertadidikdenganmetode
problem
based
learning
padasiswakelasVII
AMTS
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
115
NegeriDonomulyoKulonProgotahunpelajaran
Indonesia,17(49), hlm. 1410-2994.
2012/2013.
JurnalFisika
Wikipedia.
(2013).
Indeksstandarpencemarudara.
[Online].
Diaksesdarihttp://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indeks_Standar_Pencemar_Udara
Winter. (2001). Speaking of teaching. Stanford University Newsletter On
Teaching, 11(1), hlm. 1-6.
Wong, K. K. H.& Day, J. R.. (2009). A comparative study of problem-based and
lecture-based learning in junior secondary school science. Research
Science Education, 39 (4), hlm. 625-642.
Wu, Y. T. & Tsai, C. C. (2011). The effects of different online searching activities
on high school students’ cognitive structures and information reasoning
regarding a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 41 (6),
hlm. 771-785.
Wulandari, N. (2015). Implementasi model problem based learning (PBL) pada
pembelajaran ipa terpadu untuk meningkatkan literasisains dan
keterampilan pemecahan masalah siswa smp pada materi kalor. (Tesis).
Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Yang, F. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Reasoning about Science –related uncertain
issue and epistemological perspectives among children. Instructional
Science, 3, hlm. 325-354.
Yuliati,
L.
&Zulaika,
S.
(2013).
Pengaruhintegrative
learning
terhadappenguasaankonsepkemampuanpemecahanmasalahfisikasiswakelas
X. Proceeding Seminar Nasional IPA V (hlm. 332-335). Semarang :
UNNES
Zimmerman, C. (2005). The development of scientific reasoning skills: what
psychologists contribute to an understanding of elementary science
learning.[Online].Diaksesdarihttp://informalscience.org/image/research/C
orine_Zimmerman_Final_Paper.pdf.
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Acar, O. & Patton, B. R. (2012). Argumetation and formal reasoning skills in
argumentation-based guided inquiry course. Procedia Social and
Behavioral Sciences. 46 (12), hlm. 4756-4760.
Achmad, R. (2004). Kimia lingkungan. Yogyakarta: Andi Press.
Akinoglu, O. &Tandogan, R. O. (2007). The effects of problem-based active
learning in science education on student’s academic achievement, attitude
and concept learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and
Technology Education, 6, hlm. 1205-1209.
Arifin, M. (1984). Pengembangan program pengajaranbidangstudikimia.
Surabaya: Airlangga Press.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Statistikkonsepdasardanaplikasinya. Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Arimbawa,P.,
Saida,
I.W.,
&Tika,I.N.
(2013)
Pengaruh
model
pembelajaranberbasisproyekterhadapkemampuanpemecahanmasalah IPA
sehari-hariditinjaudarimotivasiberprestasisiswa.
E-Journal
Program
PascasarjanaUniversitasPendidikanGanesha, 3 (1),hlm.83-87.
Arends, R. I. (2009). Learning to teach. United States of America : The McGrawHill Companies, Inc.
Arnyana,
I.B.P.
(2007).
Penerapanmodel
PBLpadapelajaranbiologiuntukmeningkatkankompetensidankemampuanbe
rpikirkritissiswakelasX
SMAN
1
Singarajatahunpelajaran
2006/2007.JurnalPendidikandanPengajaranUndiksa, 2 (2), hlm. 61-65.
Bao, L. (2009). Learning and scientific reasoning. International Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education, 8 (5), hlm. 323-331.
Bekiroglu, F. O. &Eskin, H. (2012). Examination of the relationship between
engagement in scientific argumentation and conceptual knowledge.
International Journal of science and Mathematics Education, 10, hlm.
1415-1443.
Berland, L. K.& Hammer, D. (2011). Framing of scientific argumentation.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8 (3), hlm 114-118.
Bilgin, I., Senocak, E. &Sosbilir, M. (2009). The effects of probem based learning
instruction on university student’ performance of conceptual and
104
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
105
quantitative problems in gas concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,
Sains& Technology Education, 5 (2), hlm. 153-164.
Bottcher, F. &Meisert, A. (2011). Argumentation in science education: a modelbased framework. Journal of science and Education, 20, hlm. 102-140.
Brown, N. J. S. (2010). The evidence- based reasoning framework: assessig
scientific reasoning. Educational Assesssment, 15, hlm. 123-141.
Cetin, P. S., Dogan, N., &Kutluca, A. Y. (2014). The quality of pre-service
science teachers’ argumantion: Influence of content knowledge. Journal of
Science Teacher Education, 25, hlm. 309-331.
Chen, C. T. & She, H. C. (2014). The effectiveness of scientific inquiry
with/without integration of scientific reasoning. International Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education, 14 (7), hlm. 511-516.
Choi, A., Hand, B. & Norton-Meier, L. (2013). Grade 5 student’s online
argumentation about their in-class inquiry investigations. Research Science
Education, 43 (5), hlm 724-738.
Christenson, N. (2012). Using the see-sep model to analyze upper secondary
student’s use of
supporting reasons in arguing socioscientific
issues.Journal Science Education Technology, 21 (3), hlm. 342-347.
Coladarci, T., Cobb, C. D., Minium, E.W. & Clarke, R.B. (2011). Fundamental of
statistical reasoning in education. United States of America : Wiley.
Copi, I.M. & Cohen, C. (1990). Introduction to logic. New York: Macmillan
Publishing Company.
Dahar, R.W. (2011). Teori-teoribelajardanpembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Dawson, V. &Venville, G. J. (2009). High-school students’ informal reasoning
and argumentation about biotechnology: an indicator of scientific
literacy?.International Journal of Science Education, 3 (11), hlm. 14211445.
Dawson, V. M, &Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing
students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school
genetic. Research in Science Education, 40, hlm. 133-148.
De Graaff, E. &Kolmos, A. (2003). Characteristic of problem based learnig.
Research in Science Education, 19 (5), hlm. 657-662
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
106
Depdiknas. (2008). Pengembangan model pendidikankecakapanhidup. [Online].
Diaksesdari http://www.puskur.net
Depdiknas. (2013). Permendikbud No. 68 tahun 2013 tentangKurikulum 2013.
Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Ding, L., Wei, X.& Mollohan, K. (2014). Does higher education improve student
scientific reasoning skill?.International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 14 (5), hlm. 383-386.
Dolan, E & Grady, J. (2010). Recognizing students’ scientific reasoning: a tool for
categorizing complexity of reasoning during teaching by inquiry. Journal
of Science Teacher Education, 21, hlm. 31-55.
Dunbar, K. N. &Klahr, D. (2012). The oxford handbook of thinking and
reasoning. USA: Oxford University Press.
Duschl, R. A. (2007). Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria. Science &
Technology Education Library, 35, hlm. 159-175.
Eggen&Kauchak. (2012). Strategidanmodel pembelajaran. Jakarta :Indeks
Erduran, S., Ardac, D., &Yakmaci-Guzel, B. (2006). Learning to teach
argumentation: case studies of pre-service secondary science teacher.
Eurasia Journal of Mathematic Science and Technology Education, 2 (2),
hlm.1-14.
Erduran, S.&Jimenez, A. M. (2011). Argumentation in science education. Science
& Technology Education Library, 39 (1),hlm. 158-173.
Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y. & Park, J. Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in
science education. International Journal of STEM Education, 2 (1), hlm.
81-86.
Feierabend, T. (2012). Two approaches for analyzing students’ competence of
evaluation in group discussions about climate change.International
Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7 (4), 581-598.
Foong, C. C. &Daeniel, E. G. S. (2010). Assesing students’ argumentation made
in sosio-scientific contexts: the considerations of structural complexity and
the depth of content knowledge. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science,
9, hlm. 1120-1127.
Fraenkel, J.R. &Wallen, N.E. (2007). How to design and evaluate research in
education. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
107
Frosch, C. A. (2015). Understanding the role of reasoning ability in mathematical
achievement.
[Online].
Diaksesdarihttp://ceur-ws.org/Vol1419/paper0105.pdf.
Frutak, E. M. (2008). A framework for analyzing reasoning in science classroom
discourse: paperpresented at the annual meeting of the American.
Educational Research Association, 14 (1), hlm. 39-44.
Gallagher, S. (1995). Implementing problem based learning in science classrooms.
School Science and Mathematics, 95 (3), hlm. 136-146
Gracia-Mila, M., Gilabert, S., Erduran, S., Feltton, M. (2013). The effect of
argumentative task goal on the quality of argumentative discourse.
Research in Science Education, 97 (4), hlm. 497-523
Gulo, W. (2002).Strategibelajarmengajar. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Gurlen, E. (2011). Problem the effect of problem based learning on learning
outcomes, problem solving skillsand selfefficacy belief. Journal of
Education, 5 (2), hlm. 62-63.
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/ gain score. United States of America:
Indiana University.
Hakyolu, H. &Bekiroglu, F. O. (2011). Assesment of students science knowledge
levels and involvement with argumentation. International Journal for
Cross-Disciplinary Subject in Education, 2 (1), hlm. 346-354.
Hamdayana, (2014). Model danmetodepembelajarankreatifdanberkarakter.
Bogor: Ghilia Indonesia.
Han, J.(2013). Scientific reasoning: research, development, assessment.
(Dissertation), The Ohio State University.
Hartati, R. (2015). Implementasi model problem based learning (PBL)
padapembelajaranipaterpaduuntukmeningkatkanliterasisainsdankemamp
uanberpikirkritissiswakelasVII
SMP
padamateripencemaranlingkungan.(Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana,
UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Herawati,
D.
(2015).
Penalaranilmiahsiswapadasekolahmultinasionaldansekolahberorientasil
ingkungan.
(Tesis).SekolahPascasarjana,
UniversitasPendidikan
Indonesia, Bandung.
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
108
Herman,
T.
(2007).
Pembelajaranberbasismasalahuntukmeningkatkankemampuanberpikirm
atematistingkattinggisiswasekolahmenengahpertama.
(Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Hmelo, C. & Silver. (2004). Problem based learning: what and how do students
learn?.Educational Psychology Review, 16 (3), hlm. 235-262.
Holil,
Anwar.
(2009).
Hakikatpembelajaran
IPA2.
Online.
Diaksesdarihttp://anwarholil.blogspot.com/2009/01/hakikat-pembelajaranipa.html.
Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatansaintifikdankontekstualdalampembelajaranabad
21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Hudoyo, H. (1979). Pengembangankurikulummatematika&pelaksanaannya di
depankelas. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
Hutapea,
N.
M.
(2013).
Peningkatankemampuanpenalaran,
komunikasimatematisdankemandirianbelajarsiswa
SMA
melaluipembelajarangeneratif.
(Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana,
UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Inch, E. S. (2006). Critical thinking and communication: the use of reason in
argument. Boston: Pearson Education.
Indrawati, (2000). Keterampilan proses sains. Bandung: PustakaRekaCipta.
Irwan,
Z.
D.
(1996).
Prinsip-prinsipekologi,
lingkungandanpelestariannya. Jakarta: BumiAksara.
ekosistem,
Jalaludin,
D.
(2009).
Penggunaan
model
pembelajaranberbasismasalahdenganpendekataninkuiriterbimbinguntukm
eningkatkanpenguasaankonseplistrikdinamisdankecakapanilmiahsiswadidi
k SMA. (Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia,
Bandung.
Jasin, M. (2011). Ilmualamiahdasar. Jakarta: Grafindo.
Jufri, W. (2013). Belajardanpembelajaransains. Bandung: PustakaRekaCipta
Juliawan,
D.
(2012).
Pengaruh
model
pembelajaranberbasismasalahterhadappemahamankonsepdanketerampilan
proses
sainssiswakelasXI
SMA
N
2
Kutatahunpelajaran
2011/2012.JurnalKependidikan, 42 (3), hlm. 192-195.
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
109
Johnson , E. B. (2010). Contextual teaching learning. Bandung: Kaifa.
Joko, S. (2012). Keefektifan model pembelajarankontekstualdenganpendekatan
open
ended
dalamaspekpenalarandanpemecahanmasalahpadamaterisegitiga di kelas
VII.
[Online].
Diaksesdarihttp//ejournal.upgrismg.ac.id/index.php/malihpeddas/article/view/64.
Kaya, E., Erdurn, S. & Cetin, P. S. (2010). High school students’ perception of
argumentation.Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 2, hlm. 39713975.
Kemendikbud.
(2013).
Permendikbud
No.
81
A
tahun
2013
tentangpanduanpengembanganpembelajarankurikulum 2013. Jakarta:
DirektoratPembinaanSekolahmenengah Pertama.
Keskin, S. C. (2013). Student cognitive awareness about of reasons of
environmental problems. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28 (3), hlm.
378-381.
Klegeris, A. (2011).Impact of problem based learning in a large classroom setting:
student perception and problem solving skills.Procedia Social and
Behavioral Science, 7 (4), hlm. 437-445.
Koenenman , M., Goedhart, M. &Ossevoort, M. (2013). Introducing preuniversity students to primary scientific literatur through argumentation
analysis. Research Science Education, 43 (9), hlm. 2009-2034
Koenig, K., Schen. M.&Bao, L. (2012). Explicitly targeting pre-service teacher
scientific reasoning abilities and understanding of nature of science
through an introductory science cource.Winter, 21 (2), hlm. 58-62
Konstantinidou, A. &Macagno, F. (2013). Understaning students’ reasoning:
argumentation schemes as an interpretation method in science education.
Science & Education, 22, hlm. 1069-1087.
Kulatunga, U., Moog, R. S. & Lewis, J. E. (2013). Argumentation and
participation patterns in general chemistry peer-led sessions. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching,50 (10), hlm. 1207-123.
Kuhn,D., &Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. World Applied
Sciences Journal, 18 (5), hlm. 1245-1260.
Kurniawati, R. (2013). Meningkatkankemampuanberpikirkritismatematiksiswa
SMA melalui model pembelajaranmissouri mathematics project:
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
110
studikuasieksperimenterhadapsiswakelas X SMA N 11 Bandung, (Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Kusumaningsih,
D.
(2011).
Upayameningkatkankemampuanberpikirkritissiswakelas X-C SMA N 11
Yogyakarta melaluipembelajaranmatematikaperbandingantrigonometri.
[Online].
Diaksesdari
http//core.kmi.open.ac.uk/download/pdf/11859973.pdf.
Kuslan, L. &Stone,A. H. (1969). Teaching children science: an inquryapproachs.
California: Publishing Company, Inc.
Lawson, A. E. (2004). The nature and development of scientific reasoning: a
synthetic view. International Journal of Science and Mathematic
Education, 2, hlm. 307-338.
Lazonder, A. W.&Drost, S. W. (2014). Advancing scientific reasoning in upper
elementary classrooms: direct instruction versus task structuring. Journal
of Science Education and Technology, 15 (2), hlm 109-113.
Lee, C. Q.& She, H. C. (2010). Facilitating students’ conceptual change and
scientific reasoning involving the unit of combustion. Research in Science
Education, 40, hlm. 479-504.
Liliasari&Trawil,
M.
Berpikirkompleksdanimplementasidalampembelajaran
UNM
IPA.
2013.
Makasar:
Lohman, M. & Finkelstein, M. (2002). Designing case in problem based learning
to foster problem solving skill. European Journal of Dental Education, 6
(2), hlm. 121-127.
Lyle, K. & Robinson, W. (2001). Teaching science problem solving: an overview
of experimental work.Journal of Chemical Eduction, 78 (9), hlm. 11621165.
Majid, A. (2014). Implementasikurikulum 2013: Kajianteoritisdanpraktis.
Bandung: Interes.
Manurung, S. R. (2013). Pengembangan model pembelajarandengan media
hiperteksberdasarkanskemapemecahanmasalahberintikanargumentasitoul
min:
suatustudipenerapanpada
topic
kinematika.
(Disertasi).
SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
McDermott, L.C. (1996). Physics by inquiry. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
111
Mercier, H.&heintz, C. (2014). Scientist’s argumentatif reasoning. Spinger
Science and Business Media, 33, hlm. 513-524.
Muhson,
A.
(2009).Peningkatanminatbelajardanpemahamanmahasiswamelaluipenerap
an problem based learning.JurnalKependidikan, 39(2),hlm. 171-182.
Mujiyanto.
(2012).
Pengaruh
model
blended
learning
terhadappemahamankonsepditinjaudaripenalaran formal siswakelas X
SMAN
1
Balikpapan.
[Online].
Diaksesdarihttp://karyailmiah.um.ac.id/index.php/disertasi/article/view/22
821.
Mulyasa, A. (2010). Model pembelajaraninkuiridenganmenggunakan virtual
laboratory
dan
real
laboratory
untukmeningkatkanpenguasaankonsepdankemampuanpenalaransiswasma
padatopiklistrikdinamis.
(Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana,
UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Muslim.
(2014).
Pengembanganprogram
perkuliahanfisikasekolahberorientasikemampuanberargumentasicalon
guru fisika. (Disertasi). UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Mustafa,
S.
P.
(2013).
Pengaruhmodel
pembelajarangeneratifterhadapkemampuan pemecahan masalah dan
penalaransiswa. (Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan
Indonesia, Bandung.
National Research Council.(1996). National science education standards.
Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
Newman, M. J. (2011). Problem based learning: an introduction and overview of
the key feature of the approach. Journal of Veterinary, 23 (3), hlm. 12-20.
Nurdini,
S.
(2013).
Pengaruhpembelajaranberbasismasalahterhadapkemampuanpemecahanm
asalahdanketerampilan proses IPA siswapadasistemekskresi. (Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikanIndnesia, Bandung.
Nuryanti,P.(2010).
Pengaruh
model
pembelajaranberbasispraktikumterhadapketerampilan
proses
sains,
sikapilmiahdanpenguasaankonsepsistemregulasi.
(Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Novianawati.
(2015).
Pengembanganpenalaranilmiahpadapembelajaranipaterpadudenganmengg
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
112
unakan model levels of inquiry. JurnalPendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4 (1),
hlm. 19 – 25.
Osborne, J.(2001). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. School
Science Review, 41 (10), hlm. 994-1020.
Redhana,
I.
W.
(2012).Modelpembelajaranberbasismasalahdanpertanyaansocratikuntukme
ningkatkanketerampilanberpikirkritissiswa. JurnalCakrawalaPendidikan,
3 (1), hlm. 13-17.
Redjeki, S. (2014). Model-model pembelajaran yang mendukungkurikulum2013.
Makalah.UniversitasKuningan.
Roshayanti,
F.
(2012).Pengembangan
model
asesmenargumentatifuntukmengukurketerampilanargumentasimahasiswap
adakonsepfisiologimanusia.JurnalCakrawalaPendidikan, 3 (2), hlm. 6368.
Rusmono. (2014). Strategipembelajarandenganproblem based learning ituperlu.
untukmeningkatkanprofesionalitas guru. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Rustaman, N. Y. (2007). Assesmendalampembelajaransains. Bandung: UPI.
Rutherford, F. J. &Ahlgren, A., (1990). Science for all Americans. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Sadia, I. W. (2007). Pengembangankemampuanberpikir formal siswaSMA
melaluipenerapan model pembelajaran “problem based learning” dan
“cycle learning” dalampembelajaranfisika.
JurnalPendidikandanPengajaranUndiksha, 1, hlm. 1-2.
Sani, R. A. (2014). Pembelajaransaintifikuntukimplementasikurikulum2013.
Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategipembelajaranberorientasistandar proses pendidikan.
Bandung: KencanaPrenada Media Group.
Santrock, J. W. (2013).Children. New York: The Mc-Graw Hill Companies, Inc
Simosi, M. (2003). Using toulmin’s framework for the analysis of everyday
argumentation: some methodological considerations. Journal of
Veterinary, 15 (4), hlm. 185-202.
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
113
Sitohang,
K.,
Rima,
F.,
Molan,
B.
(2012).
thingkingmembangunpemikiranlogis. Jakarta: SinarHarapan.
Critical
Sitorus,
A.
(2011).
PeningkatankemampuanpenalarandanpemecahanmasalahsiswaSMA
menggunakanstrategipembelajaranpeningkatankemampuanberpikir.[Onlin
e]. Diaksesdari http//diglib.unnimed.ac.id/bookmark/1334/senior.
Slameto. (2010). Belajardanfaktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jakarta:
Rinekacipta.
Sprod, T. (1998). “I can change your opinion on that”: social constructivist whole
class discussions and their effect on scientific reasoning. Research in
Science Education, 28 (4), hlm. 463-480.
Sudjana. (2005). Metodastatistik. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sugiyono. (2013) Metodepenelitianpendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Suharnan.
(2012).
Penerapanpendekatanklasifikasiuntukmeningkatkanpengetahuankonsepdu
niatumbuhandanpenalaransiswa SMA berdasarkan gender.(Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Sund R. R. &Trowbrbge, L. W. (1973). Teaching science by inquiry in the
secondary school, 22nd ed. Ohio: Merill Pub. Howell Company.
Sunu. (2001). MelindungilingkungandenganmenerapkanISO. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Suparno, P. (2001). Teoriperkembangankognitif jean piaget. Yogjakarta
:Kanisius.
Surapranata. S. (2009). Analisis, validitas, reliabilitas dan interpretasi hasil tes.
Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Sutopo&Waldrip, B. (2014). Impact of a representational approach on students’
reasoning and conceptual understanding in learning mechanics.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12 (7), hlm.
741-765.
Tarigan,
E.
A.
(2015).
Penerapan
PBL
berbasismetodepraktikumterhadappenguasaankonsepdankemampuanargu
mentasitertulissiswapadamateriinteraksimahlukhidupdenganlingkunganny
a.(Tesis). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia,
Bandung.
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
114
Tatar, E. &Oktaym, M. (2011). The effectiveness of problem based learning on
teaching the first law of thermodynamics.Research in Science and
Technological Education. 29(3), hlm. 315-332.
Tjasyono, B. (2004). Klimatologi. Bandung:ITB.
Tosun, C. &Taskesenligil,Y. (2011). The effect of problem based learning on
student motivation towards chemistry classes and on learning
strategies.Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9 (1), hlm. 126-131.
Trianto.
(2014).
Model
pembelajaranterpadu,
konsep,
danimplementasinyadalamkurikulumtingkatsatuanpendidikan
Jakarta : PT BumiAksara.
strategi,
(KTSP).
Toharudin, U. (2011). Membangunliterasisains. Bandung:Humaniora
Tytler, R., Haslam, F., Prain, V.&Hubber, P. (2009). An explicit representational
focus for teaching and learning about animals in the environment.
Teaching Science, 55(4), hlm. 21-27.
Tytler, R.& Peterson, S. (2003). Tracing young children’s scientific reasoning.
Research in Science Education, 33 (3), hlm. 433-465.
Varma, K. (2014). Supporting scientific experimentation and reasoning in young
elementay school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology,
23,hlm. 381-397.
Vasconcelos, C. (2010). Teaching environmental education through PBL:
evaluation of a teaching intervention program. Research Science
Education, 40 (1), hlm. 219-232.
Verheij,
B.
(2005). Evaluating argument
based
scheme.Argumentation Journal, 19, hlm. 347-371
on
Toulmin’s
Waldrip, B. (2012). Reasoning through representing in school science. Teaching
Science, 58 (1), hlm. 14-18.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V.&Sellings, P. (2013). Explaining Newton’s Laws of motion:
using student reasoning through representation to develop conceptual
understanding. Instructional Science, 41, hlm. 165-189.
Widodo,
L.
W.
(2013).
Peningkatanaktivitasbelajardanhasilbelajarpesertadidikdenganmetode
problem
based
learning
padasiswakelasVII
AMTS
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
115
NegeriDonomulyoKulonProgotahunpelajaran
Indonesia,17(49), hlm. 1410-2994.
2012/2013.
JurnalFisika
Wikipedia.
(2013).
Indeksstandarpencemarudara.
[Online].
Diaksesdarihttp://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indeks_Standar_Pencemar_Udara
Winter. (2001). Speaking of teaching. Stanford University Newsletter On
Teaching, 11(1), hlm. 1-6.
Wong, K. K. H.& Day, J. R.. (2009). A comparative study of problem-based and
lecture-based learning in junior secondary school science. Research
Science Education, 39 (4), hlm. 625-642.
Wu, Y. T. & Tsai, C. C. (2011). The effects of different online searching activities
on high school students’ cognitive structures and information reasoning
regarding a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 41 (6),
hlm. 771-785.
Wulandari, N. (2015). Implementasi model problem based learning (PBL) pada
pembelajaran ipa terpadu untuk meningkatkan literasisains dan
keterampilan pemecahan masalah siswa smp pada materi kalor. (Tesis).
Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Yang, F. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Reasoning about Science –related uncertain
issue and epistemological perspectives among children. Instructional
Science, 3, hlm. 325-354.
Yuliati,
L.
&Zulaika,
S.
(2013).
Pengaruhintegrative
learning
terhadappenguasaankonsepkemampuanpemecahanmasalahfisikasiswakelas
X. Proceeding Seminar Nasional IPA V (hlm. 332-335). Semarang :
UNNES
Zimmerman, C. (2005). The development of scientific reasoning skills: what
psychologists contribute to an understanding of elementary science
learning.[Online].Diaksesdarihttp://informalscience.org/image/research/C
orine_Zimmerman_Final_Paper.pdf.
Isgiandini, 2016
UPAYA PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu