Speaking Scores Data Description

35 obtained score 70, in which score 70 is characterized as B, the standard score. Although some students obtained minimum score, but some students obtained score 85, which means they obtained A, an excellent score. Overall, the 3 rd students of EED of UIN Jakarta have good listening comprehension; they passed listening comprehension test, which can be proved from the description above.

2. Speaking Scores

The scores of speaking bellow are the scores that were gained from the test that was conducted by the researcher. There were two assessors who assessed the speaking test. The assessors were the researcher and her friend. Moreover, the assessors used Harris’s scale to assess the ability of the test takers. The scores are such as bellow: Table 4.3 Speaking Scores Participants Assessor 1 Assessor 2 Student 1 88 84 Student 2 72 68 Student 3 84 88 Student 4 84 64 Student 5 76 60 Student 6 80 72 Student 7 52 48 Student 8 64 68 Student 9 76 64 Student 10 64 56 Student 11 72 76 Student 12 84 84 Student 13 68 64 Student 14 72 60 36 Student 15 92 96 Student 16 88 84 Student 17 68 48 Student 18 76 64 Student 19 60 52 Student 20 68 68 Student 21 80 80 Student 22 64 64 Student 23 76 76 Student 24 84 72 Student 25 68 64 Student 26 84 80 Student 27 96 92 Student 28 84 76 Student 29 68 68 Student 30 64 64 Student 31 76 76 After assessing students’ speaking performance, the scores above were counted as bellow: = Score from assessor 1 + Score from assessor 2 2 After have been calculated, the scores were gained such as bellow: Table 4.4 Final Scores of Speaking Test Participants Speaking Scores Y Student 1 86 Student 2 70 Student 3 86 Student 4 74 37 Student 5 68 Student 6 76 Student 7 50 Student 8 66 Student 9 70 Student 10 60 Student 11 74 Student 12 84 Student 13 66 Student 14 66 Student 15 94 Student 16 86 Student 17 58 Student 18 70 Student 19 56 Student 20 68 Student 21 80 Student 22 64 Student 23 76 Student 24 78 Student 25 66 Student 26 82 Student 27 94 Student 28 80 Student 29 68 Student 30 64 Student 31 76 Such as the description in the listening section, the scores are characterized such as bellow: 80 – 100 = A 38 70 – 79 = B 60 – 69 = C 0 – 50 = D An “A” is characterized as an excellent score. It is the highest score and the students who obtained it, is passed the test excellently. Then, B is characterized as good or the standardized score. Next, C is characterized as enough, or the test takers are passed the test but it is suggested to retake the test or remedial the test. The last, D score is characterized as not good or the test takers are considered failed the test. To know that, the researcher searched for the descriptive statistic using SPSS. The researcher searched it because she wanted to know the mean, mode, median, and standard deviation scores of listening test. It can be described such as bellow: Table 4.5 Descriptive Statistic of Speaking Scores From the data above, the respondents are 31 students. The mean score of speaking is 72. It means that the average score that the students obtained is 72. Meanwhile, the highest score of listening test is 94 while the lowest score is 50. Then, the median score or the middle score of speaking is 70. In addition, the mode score or the score that appear the Statistics Speaking N Valid 31 Missing 1 Mean 72 Median 70 Mode 66 Std. Deviation 10 Variance 113 Minimum 50 Maximum 94 39 most is 66. It means that most of the students obtained 66 in speaking. The standard deviation is 10 with variance 113. Seeing the scores above, it can be concluded that some students of the 3 rd semester of EED still speak little. Some students are excellent and most of them are passive. It can be seen that most of students obtained score 66, in which score 66 is characterized as C. Although some students still obtained C, there are some students who really good in their speaking performance. Overall, the 3 rd students of EED of UIN are still passive in speaking. They still want not to speak up and choose to give no participation in speaking in group, although there are some students who are very excellent in their speaking performance.

B. Data Analysis

Dokumen yang terkait

A Descriptive Study of the Fourth Year Students’ Listening Comprehension Ability Using Total Physical Response at SDN Mojosari 04 Puger in the 2005/2006 Academic Year.

0 5 6

The Effect of Using Slow Beat English Songs on the Eight Year Students’ Listening Comprehension Achievement at SMPN 3 Jember in The 2011/2012 Academic Year

0 4 15

The Effect of Using Slow Beat English Songs on the Eight Year Students’ Listening Comprehension Achievement at SMPN 3 Jember in The 2011/2012 Academic Year

0 5 52

The Effect of Using Slow Beat English Songs on the Eight Year Students’ Listening Comprehension Achievement at SMPN 3 Jember in The 2011/2012 Academic Year

0 4 15

The Effect of Using Slow Beat English Songs on the Eight Year Students’ Listening Comprehension Achievement at SMPN 3 Jember in The 2011/2012 Academic Year

0 7 14

The Correlation between Listening Comprehension and Speaking Ability (A Correlational Study at the Third Semester of English Education Department Students of UIN Jakarta Academic Year 2013/2014)

0 10 79

The Relationship between Students’ Motivation and Their English Learning Achievement (A Correlational Study at the Second Grade of SMAN 3 TANGSEL)

4 42 71

Students' Reading Comprehension Based On Their Learning Styles (A Causal Comparative Study at the Eight Term Students of English Education Department of UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta)

0 14 0

“A Comparative Analysis on Sanguine and Phlegmatic Students Concerning their English Speaking Skill “(A Comparative Study at the Second Year Students of SMP Wijayakusuma)”. Strata 1 (S1). Department of English Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teachers’

0 8 12

A. The Implementation of Whole Language Approach in Teaching Listening at the Third Semesters Students of English Education Program of STAIN Palangka Raya. - The Implementation of Whole Language Approach In Teaching Listening At The Third Semester Student

0 0 33